Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Erratum

An erratum for this article has been published. To view the erratum, please click here.

Journal of Advanced Transportation
Volume 2017 (2017), Article ID 3078063, 10 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/3078063
Research Article

Investigating the Transferability of Calibrated Microsimulation Parameters for Operational Performance Analysis in Roundabouts

Department of Civil Engineering, University of Calabria, Rende, 87036 Cosenza, Italy

Correspondence should be addressed to Vincenzo Gallelli; ti.lacinu@illellag.oznecniv

Received 31 July 2016; Revised 17 December 2016; Accepted 4 January 2017; Published 19 January 2017

Academic Editor: Dongjoo Park

Copyright © 2017 Vincenzo Gallelli et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. F. F. Saccomanno, F. Cunto, G. Guido, and A. Vitale, “Comparing safety at signalized intersections and roundabouts using simulated rear-end conflicts,” Transportation Research Record, vol. 2078, pp. 90–95, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. B. B. Park and J. D. Schneeberger, “Microscopic simulation model calibration and validation, case study of VISSIM simulation model for a coordinated actuated signal system,” Transportation Research Record, vol. 1856, pp. 185–192, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. F. G. Praticò, R. Vaiana, and V. Gallelli, “Micro-simulation effectiveness in predicting operating speed profiles in a roundabout,” Advances in Transportation Studies, vol. 37, pp. 5–14, 2015. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. R. Vaiana, V. Gallelli, and T. Iuele, “Methodological approach for evaluation of roundabout performances through microsimulation,” Applied Mechanics and Materials, vol. 253–255, no. 1, pp. 1956–1966, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. T. Vieira da Rocha, A. Can, C. Parzani, B. Jeanneret, R. Trigui, and L. Leclercq, “Evaluating the influence of microscopic traffic models outputs on fuel consumption estimation,” Transportation Research Part D, vol. 24, pp. 17–26, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. TSS-Transport Simulation Systems, Aimsun (Advanced Interactive Microscopic Simulator for Urban and Non-Urban Networks), Transport Simulation Systems, Barcelona, Spain, 2012.
  7. PTV Planung Transport Verkehr. (VISSIM User Manual Version 7.0), PTV, Karlsruhe, Germany, 2014.
  8. Paramics Microsimulation, S-Paramics (Parallel Microscopic Traffic Simulator), SIAS, Edinburgh, UK, 2011.
  9. Y. H. Yap, H. M. Gibson, and B. J. Waterson, “An international review of roundabout capacity modelling,” Transport Reviews, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 593–616, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. G. Nikolic, R. Pringle, and K. Bragg, “Evaluation of analytical tools used for the operational analysis of roundabouts,” in Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Transportation Association of Canada, Halifax, Canada, September 2010. View at Scopus
  11. R. Vaiana, V. Gallelli, and T. Iuele, “Sensitivity analysis in traffic microscopic simulation model for roundabouts,” The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 174–183, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. V. Gallelli, T. Iuele, and R. Vaiana, “Conversion of a semi-two lanes roundabout into a turbo-roundabout: a performance comparison,” Procedia Computer Science, vol. 83, pp. 393–400, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. V. Astarita, V. Giofré, G. Guido, and A. Vitale, “Investigating road safety issues through a microsimulation model,” Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 20, pp. 226–235, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. C. Gagnon, A. W. Sadek, A. Touchette, and M. Smith, “Calibration potential of common analytical and microsimulation roundabout models: New England case study,” Transportation Research Record, vol. 2071, pp. 77–86, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. X. Chen and M. S. Lee, “A case study on multi-lane roundabouts under congestion: comparing software capacity and delay estimates with field data,” Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 154–165, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. I. Ištoka Otković, T. Tollazzi, and M. Šraml, “Calibration of microsimulation traffic model using neural network approach,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 40, no. 15, pp. 5965–5974, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. R. Arroju, H. K. Gaddam, L. D. Vanumu, and K. Ramachandra Rao, “Comparative evaluation of roundabout capacities under heterogeneous traffic conditions,” Journal of Modern Transportation, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 310–324, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. J. Barceló, Fundamentals of Traffic Simulation, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2010.
  19. M. Essa and T. Sayed, “Transferability of calibrated microsimulation model parameters for safety assessment using simulated conflicts,” Accident Analysis and Prevention, vol. 84, pp. 41–53, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. B. Ciuffo, J. Casas, M. Montanino, J. Perarnau, and V. Punzo, “Gaussian process metamodels for sensitivity analysis of traffic simulation models. Case Study of AIMSUN Mesoscopic Model,” Transportation Research Record, vol. 2390, pp. 87–98, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. T. Tettamanti, A. Csikós, I. Varga, and A. Eleőd, “Iterative calibration of VISSIM simulator based on genetic algorithm,” Acta Technica Jaurinensis, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 145–152, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. B. Ciuffo, V. Punzo, and V. Torrieri, “Comparison of simulation-based and model-based calibrations of traffic-flow microsimulation models,” Transportation Research Record, vol. 2088, no. 1, pp. 36–44, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. European Commission-Joint Research Centre, “Traffic Simulation: Case for guidelines. MULTITUDE Project-COST Action TU0903,” 2016, http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC88526.
  24. Ministero delle infrastrutture e dei Trasporti, “Decreto Ministeriale 19/04/2006-Norme funzionali e geometriche per la costruzione delle intersezioni stradali”.
  25. G. Guido, F. F. Saccomanno, A. Vitale, V. Astarita, and D. C. Festa, “Comparing safety performance measures obtained from video capture data,” Journal of Transportation Engineering, vol. 137, no. 7, pp. 481–492, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. R. Wiedemann, Simulation des Strassenverkehrsflusses, Schriftenreihe des Instituts für Verkehrswesen der Universität Karlsruhe, Band 8, Karlsruhe, Germany, 1974.
  27. F. G. Praticò, R. Vaiana, and V. Gallelli, “Transport and traffic management by micro simulation models: operational use and performance of roundabouts,” in Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Urban Transport and the Environment (UT '12), pp. 383–394, Coruña, Spain, May 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. F. Cunto and F. F. Saccomanno, “Calibration and validation of simulated vehicle safety performance at signalized intersections,” Accident Analysis and Prevention, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 1171–1179, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. G. Guido, F. F. Saccomanno, A. Vitale, V. Gallelli, and D. Rogano, “A calibration framework of car following models for safety analysis based on vehicle tracking data from smartphone probes,” International Journal of Mobile Network Design and Innovation, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 205–212, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. N. E. Lownes and R. B. Machemehl, “Sensitivity of simulated capacity to modification of VISSIM driver behavior parameters,” Transportation Research Record, vol. 1988, pp. 102–110, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. D. C. Montgomery, Design and Analysis of Experiments, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, USA, 6th edition, 2005. View at MathSciNet
  32. European Commission—Joint Research Centre. The Calibration of Traffic Simulation Models. Report on the assessment of different Goodness of Fit measures and Optimization Algorithms MULTITUDE Project—COST Action TU0903, http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC68403.
  33. D. K. Hale, C. Antoniou, M. Brackstone, D. Michalaka, A. T. Moreno, and K. Parikh, “Optimization-based assisted calibration of traffic simulation models,” Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, vol. 55, pp. 100–115, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. S. Sikder and A. Pinjari, “Spatial transferability of person-level daily activity generation and time use models: an Empirical Assessment,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, vol. 2343, pp. 95–104, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  35. S. Sikder, B. Augustin, A. R. Pinjari, and N. Eluru, “Spatial transferability of tour-based time-of-day choice models,” Transportation Research Record, vol. 2429, pp. 99–109, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus