Research Article
Analyzing the Influence of Neighborhood Development Pattern on Modal Choice
Table 2
The distribution of choice modes among the three case study suburbs.
| ā | Nonwork trips, all suburbs | Nonwork trips, inner suburb | Nonwork trips, middle suburb | Nonwork trips, outer suburb | Work trips, all suburbs | Work trips, inner suburb | Work trips, middle suburb | Work trips, outer suburb | Total trips, all suburbs |
| Motorized (percent) | 84.6 | 82.7 | 87.4 | 89.6 | 91.1 | 87.4 | 90.7 | 95.2 | 87.9 | Nonmotorized (percent) | 15.4 | 17.3 | 12.6 | 10.4 | 8.9 | 12.6 | 9.3 | 4.8 | 12.1 | Total number of cases | 712 | 300 | 231 | 171 | 550 | 193 | 143 | 212 | 1262 | Trips per person | 1.81 | 2.12 | 1.97 | 1.31 | 1.4 | 1.36 | 1.22 | 1.62 | 3.2 | Total number of respondents | 393 | 142 | 117 | 131 | 393 | 142 | 117 | 131 | 393 |
|
|