Research Article
Analyzing the Influence of Neighborhood Development Pattern on Modal Choice
Table 3
The nonwork modal choice (all three suburbs).
| | Variable name, alternative | Coefficients | -statistics |
| | Alternative specific constants (ASCs) | | Public transport (C5) | | | | Taxi/van/school taxi (C4) | | | | Walking (C2) | | | | Others (C1) | | | | Alternative specific attributes (ASAs) | | Travel time (min) | | | | Observation specific attributes (OSAs) | | Age over 65 years, C5 | | | | Female, C4 | | | | Person living alone, C2, C4 | | | | Number of vehicles, C4 | | | | Number of residents, C5 | | | | Number of workers, C4 | | | | Number of workers, C5 | | | | Person living alone, C1 | | | | Perceived distance to shopping complex (km), C1, C2 | | | | Perceived distance to school (km), C4 | | | | Average floor area (squared meter), C5 | | | | Perceived distance to workplace (km), C2 | | | | Not working, retired, or worked at home, C5 | | |
|
|
= 918.683; degree of freedom = 28; number of iterations completed = 10; adjusted = 0.27.
|
