Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Advanced Transportation
Volume 2017, Article ID 4720627, 11 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/4720627
Research Article

Impacts of Smart Configuration in Pedelec-Sharing: Evidence from a Panel Survey in Madrid

1Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Av. Prof. Aranguren s/n, 28040 Madrid, Spain
2KTI Institute for Transport Sciences, Than Károly utca 3–5, Budapest 1119, Hungary

Correspondence should be addressed to András Munkácsy; uh.itk@sardna.yscaknum

Received 30 April 2017; Accepted 14 June 2017; Published 15 August 2017

Academic Editor: Juan C. Cano

Copyright © 2017 András Munkácsy and Andrés Monzón. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. E. Fishman, “Bikeshare: a Review of Recent Literature,” Transport Reviews, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 92–113, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. M. Ricci, “Bike sharing: a review of evidence on impacts and processes of implementation and operation,” Research in Transportation Business and Management, vol. 15, pp. 28–38, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. M. Jászberényi and A. Munkácsy, “The introduction of the congestion charge in the light of suburbanisation processes: public opinion as a challenge ignored. Conclusions of a research conducted in Budapest,” in Proceedings of the European Transport Conference, Noordwijkerhout, Netherlands, October 2009.
  4. J. E. Yusuf, L. O'Connell, and K. A. Anuar, “For whom the tunnel be tolled: A four-factor model for explaining willingness-to-pay tolls,” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, vol. 59, pp. 13–21, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. J. M. Grisolía, F. López, and J. D. D. Ortúzar, “Increasing the acceptability of a congestion charging scheme,” Transport Policy, vol. 39, pp. 37–47, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. L. dell’Olio, A. Ibeas, P. Cecín, and F. dell'Olio, “Willingness to pay for improving service quality in a multimodal area,” Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 1060–1070, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. Z. Li, D. A. Hensher, and J. M. Rose, “Willingness to pay for travel time reliability in passenger transport: a review and some new empirical evidence,” Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 384–403, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. Z. Liu, N. Shiwakoti, and Y. Bie, “Measuring the public acceptance of urban congestion-pricing: a survey in Melbourne, Australia,” Transport, pp. 1–11, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. S. Farag and G. Lyons, “To use or not to use? An empirical study of pre-trip public transport information for business and leisure trips and comparison with car travel,” Transport Policy, vol. 20, pp. 82–92, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. S. Fujii and H. Van, “Psychological determinants of the intention to use the bus in Ho Chi Minh City,” Journal of Public Transportation, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 97–110, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. S. Chowdhury and A. A. Ceder, “Users' willingness to ride an integrated public-transport service: a literature review,” Transport Policy, vol. 48, pp. 183–195, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. C.-W. Kuo and M.-L. Tang, “Relationships among service quality, corporate image, customer satisfaction, and behavioral intention for the elderly in high speed rail services,” Journal of Advanced Transportation, vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 512–525, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. W. Payre, J. Cestac, and P. Delhomme, “Intention to use a fully automated car: attitudes and a priori acceptability,” Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, vol. 27, pp. 252–263, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. E. Fishman, S. Washington, N. Haworth, and A. Mazzei, “Barriers to bikesharing: an analysis from Melbourne and Brisbane,” Journal of Transport Geography, vol. 41, pp. 325–337, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. B. Julie, H. Brian, and M. Ahmed, “Better understanding of factors influencing likelihood of using shared bicycle systems and frequency of use,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, vol. 2314, pp. 66–71, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. E. Fishman, S. Washington, N. Haworth, and A. Watson, “Factors influencing bike share membership: an analysis of Melbourne and Brisbane,” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, vol. 71, pp. 17–30, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. D. Efthymiou, C. Antoniou, and P. Waddell, “Factors affecting the adoption of vehicle sharing systems by young drivers,” Transport Policy, vol. 29, pp. 64–73, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. S. Kaplan, F. Manca, T. A. S. Nielsen, and C. G. Prato, “Intentions to use bike-sharing for holiday cycling: an application of the theory of planned behavior,” Tourism Management, vol. 47, pp. 34–46, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. M. Bąk and P. Borkowski, “Applicability of ICT solutions in passenger transport - Case studies from different European backgrounds,” Transport, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 372–381, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. P. DeMaio, “Bike-sharing: history, impacts, models of provision, and future,” Journal of Public Transportation, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 41–56, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. P. Midgley, Bicycle-sharing schemes: Enhancing sustainable mobility in urban areas, UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs, New York, NY, USA, 2011.
  22. P. Midgley, “The role of smart bike-sharing systems in urban mobility,” Journeys, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 23–31, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  23. S. A. Shaheen, S. H. Guzaman, and H. Zhang, “Bikesharing in Europe, the Americas, and Asia past, present, and future,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, vol. 2143, pp. 159–167, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. E. Fishman, S. Washington, and N. Haworth, “Bike Share: a synthesis of the literature,” Transport Reviews, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 148–165, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. S. Shaheen, E. Martin, and A. Cohen, “Public bikesharing and modal shift behavior: a comparative study of early bikesharing systems in North America,” International Journal of Transportation, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 35–54, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. S. Shaheen, E. Martin, A. P. Cohen, N. D. Chan, and M. Pogodzinsk, Public Bikesharing in North America During a Period of Rapid Expansion: Understanding Business Models, Industry Trends & User Impacts, MTI Report 12-29, Mineta Transportation Institute, San José, Calif, USA, 2014.
  27. E. W. Martin and S. A. Shaheen, “Evaluating public transit modal shift dynamics in response to bikesharing: a tale of two U.S. cities,” Journal of Transport Geography, vol. 41, pp. 315–324, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. E. Fishman, S. Washington, and N. Haworth, “An evaluation framework for assessing the impact of public bicycle share schemes,” in Proceedings of the Transportation Research Board (TRB) 91st Annual Meeting, vol. Jan 2012, Marriott Wardman Park, Washington, DC, USA.
  29. E. Fishman, S. Washington, and N. Haworth, “Bikeshare’s impact on active travel: Evidence from the United States, Great Britain, and Australia,” Journal of Transport Health, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 135–142, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  30. E. Fishman, S. Washington, and N. Haworth, “Bike share's impact on car use: Evidence from the United States, Great Britain, and Australia,” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, vol. 31, pp. 13–20, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. J. C. García-Palomares, J. Gutiérrez, and M. Latorre, “Optimizing the location of stations in bike-sharing programs: A GIS approach,” Applied Geography, vol. 35, no. 1-2, pp. 235–246, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. J. P. Romero, A. Ibeas, J. L. Moura, J. Benavente, and B. Alonso, “A Simulation-optimization approach to design efficient systems of bike-sharing,” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 54, pp. 646–655, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  33. J. Molina-García, I. Castillo, A. Queralt, and J. F. Sallis, “Bicycling to university: Evaluation of a bicycle-sharing program in Spain,” Health Promotion International, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 350–358, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. R. Alvarez-Valdes, J. M. Belenguer, E. Benavent et al., “Optimizing the level of service quality of a bike-sharing system,” Omega (United Kingdom), vol. 62, pp. 163–175, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. G. Romanillos, M. Zaltz Austwick, D. Ettema, and J. De Kruijf, “Big data and cycling,” Transport Reviews, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 114–133, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. A. Faghih-Imani, R. Hampshire, L. Marla, and N. Eluru, “An empirical analysis of bike sharing usage and rebalancing: evidence from Barcelona and Seville,” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, vol. 97, pp. 177–191, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  37. E. Anaya and A. Castro, Observatorio de la Bicicleta Pública en España," Ed., 2017.
  38. S. Shaheen, E. Martin, A. P. Cohen, and R. S. Finson, Public Bikesharing in North America: Early Operator and User Understanding, MTI Report 11-26, Mineta Transportation Institute, San José, Calif, USA, 2012.
  39. B. Muñoz, A. Monzon, and D. Lois, “Cycling habits and other psychological variables affecting commuting by bicycle in Madrid, Spain,” Transportation Research Record, vol. 2382, pp. 1–9, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. A. Munkácsy and A. Monzón, “Potential user profiles of innovative bike-sharing systems: the case of BiciMAD (Madrid, Spain),” Asian Transport Studies, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 621–638, 2017. View at Google Scholar
  41. A. García-Martínez, A. Monzón, A. Munkácsy, and R. Lillo, “Impacto de la bicicleta eléctrica de Madrid (BiciMAD) en la intención de uso del servicio tras un año de funcionamiento,” in Proceedings of the PANAM XIX Congreso Panamericano de Ingeniería de Tránsito, Transporte y Logística, Mexico City, Mexico, September 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  42. S. Hernandez, A. Monzon, and R. de Oña, “Urban transport interchanges: a methodology for evaluating perceived quality,” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, vol. 84, pp. 31–43, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. Q. Chen and T. Sun, “A model for the layout of bike stations in public bike-sharing systems,” Journal of Advanced Transportation, vol. 49, no. 8, pp. 884–900, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. L. Chen, D. Zhang, G. Pan et al., “Bike sharing station placement leveraging heterogeneous urban open data,” in Proceedings of the 3rd ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing, UbiComp 2015, pp. 571–575, Osaka, Japan, September 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. J. Pucher and R. Buehler, City Cycling, The MIT Press, Cambridge/London, UK, 2012, The MIT Press.
  46. E. Fishman and C. Cherry, “E-bikes in the Mainstream: reviewing a decade of research,” Transport Reviews, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 72–91, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. R. C. Hampshire and L. Marla, “An analysis of bike sharing usage: Explaining trip generation and attraction from observed demand,” in Proceedings of the Transportation Research Board (TRB) 91st Annual Meeting, pp. 22–2099, Marriott Wardman Park, Washington, DC, USA, 2012.