Research Article
Impacts of Smart Configuration in Pedelec-Sharing: Evidence from a Panel Survey in Madrid
Table 2
Panel sample: some general, socioeconomic, and transport related characteristics in the before and after survey phases.
| | Total | Subscribers | Occasional users | Nonusers |
| % in survey | 100 | 21.4 | 20.4 | 58.2 | Age in 2016 (standard deviation) | 37.6 (11.6) | 37.5 (9.2) | 34.8 (12.3) | 38.6 (12.1) | Female : male (%) | 41 : 59 | 38 : 62 | 39 : 61 | 43 : 57 |
| | Before | After | Before | After | Before | After | Before | After | | % of respondents |
| Occupation | | Student | 22.9 | 17.1 | 10.6 | 4.3 | 23.9 | 26.8 | 34.2 | 18.8 | Employee | 60.7 | 66.3 | 74.5 | 85.1 | 51.2 | 58.5 | 59.0 | 61.5 | Entrepreneur | 2.0 | 4.9 | 4.2 | 4.3 | 0.0 | 4.9 | 1.7 | 5.1 | Unemployed | 10.5 | 9.8 | 6.4 | 6.4 | 14.6 | 9.8 | 10.3 | 11.1 | Pensioner | 1.5 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.6 | 2.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Education | | | | | | | | | Higher | 74.6 | 77.6 | 77.9 | 78.7 | 75.6 | 78.0 | 72.6 | 76.9 | Secondary | 24.9 | 20.0 | 19.1 | 19.1 | 24.4 | 22.0 | 26.5 | 19.7 | Household size | | | | | | | | | 1 | 14.4 | 11.7 | 12.8 | 14.9 | 17.1 | 7.3 | 13.7 | 12.0 | 2 | 25.9 | 29.8 | 36.2 | 31.9 | 24.4 | 34.1 | 23.9 | 27.4 | 3 | 25.4 | 23.4 | 17.0 | 17.0 | 26.8 | 24.4 | 27.4 | 25.6 | 4 | 25.4 | 25.4 | 25.5 | 23.4 | 19.5 | 22.0 | 27.4 | 27.4 | More | 9.0 | 9.8 | 8.5 | 12.8 | 12.2 | 12.2 | 7.7 | 7.7 | Household income (€) | | | | | | | | | –1300 | 18.9 | 23.9 | 17.0 | 14.9 | 22.0 | 29.3 | 19.7 | 25.6 | 1300–2500 | 40.3 | 39.0 | 38.3 | 38.3 | 39.0 | 39.0 | 41.0 | 39.3 | 2500– | 40.8 | 37.1 | 44.7 | 46.8 | 39.0 | 31.7 | 39.3 | 35.0 | Bicycle ownership | 78.1 | 76.1 | 70.2 | 70.2 | 80.5 | 85.4 | 79.5 | 75.2 | PT pass | 53.7 | 52.2 | 38.3 | 51.1 | 56.1 | 52.1 | 59.0 | 52.1 | Driving license | 83.6 | 85.4 | 89.4 | 91.5 | 73.2 | 75.6 | 84.6 | 86.3 | Access to car | 58.7 | 60.5 | 59.6 | 63.8 | 46.3 | 48.8 | 61.5 | 63.2 | Access to motorbike | 18.4 | 12.7 | 12.8 | 6.4 | 26.8 | 12.2 | 17.1 | 15.4 |
|
|