Research Article
Relieving the Impact of Transit Signal Priority on Passenger Cars through a Bilevel Model
Table 2
The optimizing result compared with the conventional method.
| Method and evaluation | Minimizing passenger delay | Bilevel model (5%) | Delay variation (s) | Bilevel model (10%) | Delay variation (s) |
| Cycle time (s) | 114 | 108 | | 102 | | Green (s) | 60 | 54 | | 48 | | Green (s) | 15 | 15 | | 15 | | Green (s) | 30 | 30 | | 30 | | Average vehicle delay (s) (Straight-priority direction) | 31.08 | 32.45 | 1.37 (4.41%) | 33.95 | 2.87 (9.23%) | Average vehicle delay (s) (Left-turn-priority direction) | 86.95 | 81.04 | −5.91 (−6.79%) | 75.15 | −11.8 (−13.57%) | Average vehicle delay (s) (Nonpriority direction) | 127.88 | 116.60 | −11.28 (−8.82%) | 105.34 | 22.54 (−17.63%) | Average person delay (s) (Entire intersection) | 19.16 | 19.26 | 0.1 (0.52%) | 19.42 | 0.26 (1.36%) |
|
|