Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Advanced Transportation
Volume 2017, Article ID 9575676, 16 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9575676
Research Article

A Least-Square Model to Estimate Historical Percentages of Itinerant General Aviation Operations by Aircraft Types and Flight Rules at an Airport

1The Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX 76019, USA
2Air Transportation Systems Laboratory, The Charles E. Via, Jr. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University (Virginia Tech), Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA

Correspondence should be addressed to Tao Li; ude.tv@18oat

Received 1 March 2017; Revised 11 May 2017; Accepted 4 June 2017; Published 25 July 2017

Academic Editor: Andrea D’Ariano

Copyright © 2017 Tao Li and Antonio A. Trani. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. Federal Aviation Administration, “National Plan of Integrated Airport Systems (NPIAS) 2011–2015,” Tech. Rep., Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, DC, USA, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  2. T. Zakaria, “Estimation of aircraft operations at nontowered airports in the Delaware valley region,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, vol. 1158, pp. 37–46, 1988. View at Google Scholar
  3. M. J. Muia, “An analysis of the methods used to calculate customer operations at non-towered airports and of the associated managerial uses of operations information,” Tech. Rep., The Union Institute Graduate College, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  4. Federal Aviation Administration, “Appendix A: Methodology for the 2010 General Aviation and Part 135 Acitivity Survey,” 2010.
  5. Federal Aviation Administration, “Conducting Unmanned Aircraft Flight Operations Under Federal Aviation Administration Regulations,” 2014, http://aspmhelp.faa.gov/index.php/Operations_Network_%28OPSNET%29.
  6. Federal Aviation Administration, “Terminal Area Forecast Summary Fiscal Years 2011–2040,” 2010.
  7. GRA Inc, “Forecasting aviation activity by airport,” Tech. Rep., GRA, Inc, Jenkintown, Pa, USA, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  8. Federal Aviation Administration, “Airport Master Plans,” 2007, Advisory Circular AC 150/5070-6B.
  9. Center for Transportation Research and Education, “Acceptable method of counting aircraft operations at non-tower airports,” Tech. Rep., Center for Transportation Research and Education, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA, 1996. View at Google Scholar
  10. M. J. Muia, “Counting aircraft operations at non-towered airports: a synthesis of airport practice,” ACRP Report 129, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, USA.
  11. M. J. Muia and M. E. Johnson, “Evaluating methods for counting aircraft operations at non-towered airports,” ACRP Program Synthesis 4, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, USA, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. M. Hoekstra, “Model for estimating general aviation operations at non-towered airports,” Tech. Rep., Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, DC, USA, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  13. GRA Inc, “Model for estimating general aviation operations at non-towered airports using towered and non-towered airport data,” Tech. Rep., GRA, Inc, Jenkintown, Pa, USA, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  14. R. Black and J. R. Chimka, “Re-estimating and remodeling general aviation operations,” International Journal of Applied Aviation Studies, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 47–56, 2011. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. M. Johnson and Y. Gu, “Estimating airport operations at general aviation airports using the FAA NPIAS airport categories,” International Journal of Aviation, Aeronautics, and Aerospace, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 339–354, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. A. Ghobrial, “A model to forecast aircraft operations at general aviation airports,” Journal of Advanced Transportation, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 311–323, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. L. Dou, L. David, J. Jesse, and K. Peter, “A small aircraft transportation system (sats) demand model,” Tech. Rep., Logistics Management Institute, Mclean, Va, USA, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  18. T. Li and A. A. Trani, “A model to forecast airport-level General Aviation demand,” Journal of Air Transport Management, vol. 40, pp. 192–206, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. T. Li and A. A. Trani, “A procedure to estimate the airport-level market share of itinerant GA operations by aircraft type,” in Proceedings of the 16th Integrated Communications, Navigation, and Surveillance Conference, ICNS 2016, Herndon, Va, USA, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. M. L. Ford and R. Shirack, “Estimating aircraft activity at nontowered airports: results of the aircraft activity counter demonstration project,” Transportation Research Record, pp. 24–29, 1984. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. Lousiana Department of Transportation and Development, “Lousiana airports activity study: summary report,” Tech. Rep., Lousiana Department of Transportation and Development, Baton Rouge, La, USA, 1985. View at Google Scholar
  22. R. Milone and K. Flick, “General aviation activity model,” Tech. Rep., Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments, Washington, DC, USA, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  23. Texas Department of Transportation, “Aircraft activity counter report,” Tech. Rep., Aviation Division,Texas Department of Transportation, Austin, Tex, USA, 1994. View at Google Scholar
  24. T. Li, H. Baik, and A. A. Trani, “A method to estimate the historical US air travel demand,” Journal of Advanced Transportation, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 249–265, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. T. Li and H. Baik, “Addressing two issues in the airline origin and destination survey,” in Proceedings of the Transportation Research Board 92nd Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, USA, 2013.
  26. T. Li, “A bi-level model to estimate the US air travel demand,” Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research, vol. 32, no. 2, Article ID 1550009, 1550009 pages, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  27. T. Li, H. Baik, and T. Spencer, “An optimization model to estimate the air travel demand for the United States,” in Proceedings of the 14th Integrated Communications, Navigation and Surveillance Conference, ICNS 2014, pp. E21–E211, Herndon, Va, USA, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. T. Li, “A demand estimator based on a nested logit model,” Transportation Science, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  29. M. J. Maher, “Inferences on trip matrices from observations on link volumes: a Bayesian statistical approach,” Transportation Research. Part B. Methodological, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 435–447, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  30. E. Cascetta, “Estimation of trip matrices from traffic counts and survey data: a generalized least squares estimator,” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, vol. 18, no. 4-5, pp. 289–299, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. M. G. Bell, “The estimation of origin-destination matrices by constrained generalised least squares,” Transportation Research. Part B. Methodological, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 13–22, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  32. H. Yang, Q. Meng, and M. G. H. Bell, “Simultaneous estimation of the origin-destination matrices and travel-cost coefficient for congested networks in a stochastic user equilibrium,” Transportation Science, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 107–123, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. E. Codina and J. Barceló, “Adjustment of O–D trip matrices from observed volumes: an algorithmic approach based on conjugate directions,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 155, no. 3, pp. 535–557, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  34. P. Chootinan, A. Chen, and W. Recker, “Improved path flow estimator for origin-destination trip tables,” Transportation Research Record, vol. 1923, no. 1, pp. 9–17, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. J. Doblas and F. G. Benitez, “An approach to estimating and updating origin-destination matrices based upon traffic counts preserving the prior structure of a survey matrix,” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, vol. 39, no. 7, pp. 565–591, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. Y. Nie, H. M. Zhang, and W. W. Recker, “Inferring origin-destination trip matrices with a decoupled GLS path flow estimator,” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 497–518, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. J. T. Lundgren and A. Peterson, “A heuristic for the bilevel origin-destination-matrix estimation problem,” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 339–354, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. A. Chen, S. Ryu, and P. Chootinan, “L-Norm path flow estimator for handling traffic count inconsistencies: Formulation and solution algorithm,” Journal of Transportation Engineering, vol. 136, no. 6, Article ID 008006QTE, pp. 565–575, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. E. Fernandes and R. R. Pacheco, “Efficient use of airport capacity,” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 225–238, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. M. Janic, “Modelling the capacity of closely-spaced parallel runways using innovative approach procedures,” Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 704–730, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. B. Mirkovic, “Airport apron capacity estimation—model enhancement,” Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 20, pp. 1108–1117, 2011, (The State of the Art in the European Quantitative Oriented Transportation and Logistics Research 14th Euro Working Group on Transportation & 26th Mini Euro Conference; 1st European Scientific Conference on Air Transport). View at Google Scholar
  42. G. Andreatta, P. Dell’Olmo, and G. Lulli, “An aggregate stochastic programming model for air traffic flow management,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 215, no. 3, pp. 697–704, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  43. C. N. Glover and M. O. Ball, “Stochastic optimization models for ground delay program planning with equity-efficiency tradeoffs,” Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, vol. 33, pp. 196–202, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. A. D’Ariano, D. Pacciarelli, M. Pistelli, and M. Pranzo, “Real-time scheduling of aircraft arrivals and departures in a terminal maneuvering area,” Networks, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 212–227, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  45. M. Samà, A. D’Ariano, P. D’Ariano, and D. Pacciarelli, “Air traffic optimization models for aircraft delay and travel time minimization in terminal control areas,” Public Transport, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 321–337, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. M. Samà, A. D'Ariano, P. D'Ariano, and D. Pacciarelli, “Scheduling models for optimal aircraft traffic control at busy airports: tardiness, priorities, equity and violations considerations,” Omega, vol. 67, pp. 81–98, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  47. R. Rylander and M. Björkman, “Annoyance by aircraft noise around small airports,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, vol. 205, no. 4, pp. 533–537, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. Federal Aviation Administration, “Environmental Desk Reference for Airport Actions,” 2007.
  49. Federal Aviation Administration, “FAA aerospace forecasts fiscal years 2013–2033,” Tech. Rep., Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, DC, USA.
  50. T. Li and A. A. Trani, “Modeling the impact of fuel price on the utilization of piston engine aircraft,” in Proceedings of the 2013 13th Annual Integrated Communications, Navigation and Surveillance Conference, ICNS 2013, Herndon, Va, USA, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. Federal Aviation Administration, “Traffic Flow Management System (TFMS),” 2014, http://aspmhelp.faa.gov/index.php/Traffic_Flow_Management_System_(TFMS).
  52. C. G. Rodarte, Knowledge Management in the Enhanced Traffic Management System [Master′s, thesis], Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 1974.
  53. F. Cheng, J. Gulding, B. Baszczewski, and R. Galaviz, “An optimization model for sample day selection in NAS-wide modeling studies,” in Proceedings of the 11th Integrated Communications, Navigation and Surveillance Conference: Renovating the Global Air Transportation System, ICNS 2011, pp. L61–L68, Herndon, Va, USA, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. H. Baik, T. Li, and N. K. Chintapudi, “Estimation of flight delay costs for U.S. domestic air passengers,” Transportation Research Record, vol. 2177, pp. 49–59, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. Federal Aviation Administration, “Air Traffic Organization Policy: Facility Statistical Data, Reports, and Forms,” 2008, N JO 7210.695.
  56. S. William and G. Richard, “ACRP program synthesis 2: airport aviation activity forecasting,” Tech. Rep., GRA, Inc., Jenkintown, Pa, USA, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  57. R. W. Pike, Optimization for Engineering Systems, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, NY, USA, 1986. View at MathSciNet
  58. M. Avriel, Nonlinear Programming: Analysis and Methods, Prentice-Hall, Inc, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA, 1976.
  59. A. D. Waren and L. S. Lasdon, “The status of nonlinear programming software,” Operations Research. The Journal of the Operations Research Society of America, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 431–456, 1979. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  60. Dekalb Peachtree Airport, “Dekalb Peachtree Airport,” 2017, https://www.dekalbcountyga.gov/airport.
  61. F. Cheng, J. Gulding, B. Baszczewski, R. Galaviz-Schomisch, and A. Chow, “Modeling the effect of weather conditions in sample day selection using an optimization method,” in Proceedings of the 2012 12th Integrated Communications, Navigation and Surveillance Conference: Bridging CNS and ATM, ICNS 2012, pp. N31–N311, Herndon, Va, USA, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. Destin Airport, “Destin-fort walton beach airport: airport master plan update,” Tech. Rep., Destin-Fort Walton Beach Airport, Eglin AFB, Fla, USA, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  63. Federal Aviation Administration, “Form 5010-1 - Airport Master Record (Existing Public Use Airports),” 2003, https://www.faa.gov/forms/index.cfm/go/document.information/documentID/185474.
  64. Airport Cooperative Research Program, “FY 2017 Research Problem Statements 17-03-06: Accurate Measurement of Airport Operations Counts,” 2017, http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/acrp/fy2017ps/17-03-06French.pdf.