Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Advanced Transportation
Volume 2018, Article ID 2638474, 10 pages
Research Article

Exploring the Relationships between Subjective Evaluations and Objective Metrics of Vehicle Dynamic Performance

1School of Automobile, Chang’an University, Xi’ an 710064, China
2School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Anhui Jianzhu University, Hefei 230601, China
3School of Automobile and Traffic Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Liping Yang; moc.361@6963gnipilgnay

Received 25 April 2018; Accepted 3 September 2018; Published 19 September 2018

Academic Editor: Juan C. Cano

Copyright © 2018 Jianyou Zhao et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. Z. S. Yu, Automobile Theory, The Mechanical Industry Press, Beijing, China, 5th edition, 2009.
  2. B. Heißing and H. J. Brandl, The subjective evaluations of vehicle dynamic performance, Federal Highway Research Institute, Cologne, 2002.
  3. J. A. D. A. Pereira, “New fiesta: brake pedal feeling development to improve customer satisfaction,” in Proceedings of the SAE Brasil 2003 Congress & Exhibit, Detroit, MI, USA, 2003.
  4. X. X. Tian, The Evaluation Method Research about Automotive Subjective Performance [Master Thesis], Chang’an University, 2014.
  5. B. Li, The Subjective Evaluation Method Research of Vehicle Dynamic Performance And Brake Performance [Master Thesis], Jilin University, 2008.
  6. S. C. Wang, D. Fu, J. J. Chen, F. T. Cai, and X. W. Zhang, “Determination of weights of subjective evaluation indexes of automobile dynamic performance based on entropy method,” Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, vol. 32, no. 7, pp. 153–158, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  7. J. Zehetner, P. Schoeggl, M. Dank, and K. Meitz, “Simulation of drivability in real-time,” in Proceedings of the SAE 2009 World Congress & Exhibition, Detroit, MI, USA, 2009.
  8. O. Hayat, M. Lebrun, and E. Domingues, “Powertrain drivability evaluation analysis and simplification of dynamic models,” in Proceedings of the SAE 2003 World Congress & Exhibition, Detroit, MI, USA, 2003.
  9. G.-L. Luo, F.-J. Zhang, and H.-J. Yuan, “Analysis of vehicle powertrain dynamic performance,” Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 171–178, 2013. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. X. Wei and G. Rizzoni, “Objective metrics of fuel economy, performance and drivability - a review,” in Proceedings of the SAE 2004 World Congress & Exhibition, Detroit, MI, USA, 2004.
  11. J. M. Zhou, “Application of PFI in vehicle dynamic evaluation,” Automobile & Parts, vol. 41, pp. 82–85, 2016. View at Google Scholar
  12. M. Chen and L. Guo, “The synthetic evaluation method of the dynamic performance and economic performance of battery electric vehicle based on principal component analysis,” Applied Mechanics and Materials, vol. 215-216, pp. 1259–1262, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. M. Chen and L. X. Guo, “Comprehensive evaluation of power performance and energy consumption economy of battery electric vehicle based on AHP-entropy-TOPSIS,” Journal of Machine Design, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 15–19, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  14. H. Xu, H. B. Fu, W. L. Dong, C. M. Yang, D. M. Wu, and H. Zhu, “Research on evaluation method of electric vehicle's dynamic performance based on battery output characteristics,” Journal of Beijing University of Chemical Technology (Natural Science), vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 61–66, 2018. View at Google Scholar
  15. Z. Zhang, M. R. Guo, and P. Zheng, “The pure electric vehicle dynamic performance simulation,” Applied Mechanics Materials, vol. 260-261, pp. 353–356, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. X. Zhao, H. Chen, B. Gao, L. Lou, and N. Shirou, “Correlations between subjective and objective evaluations of on-center steering feel,” in Proceedings of the FISITA 2012 World Automotive Congress, vol. 198, pp. 313–327, 2013.
  17. D. Chen, Subjective and Objective Vehicle Handling Behavior [Ph.D. thesis], University of Leeds, 1997.
  18. J. Pelikan, P. Steinbauer, M. Valasek, and J. Ulehla, “Correlation of objective and subjective evaluation of vehicle handling by neural networks,” Bulletin of Applied Mechnics, vol. 8, no. 29, pp. 1–4, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  19. Z. M. Liu, Error and Data Processing, Atomic Energy Press, Beijing, China, 1st edition, 1981.
  20. A. Didomenico and M. A. Nussbaum, “Interactive effects of physical and mental workload on subjective workload assessment,” International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, vol. 38, no. 11-12, pp. 977–983, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. R. P. King, D. A. Crolla, H. A. Ash, and J. Whitehead, “Identification of subjective-objective vehicle handling links using neural networks for the foresight vehicle,” in Proceedings of the SAE 2002 World Congress & Exhibition, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. F. Shi, H. Wang, F. Hu, and L. Yu, The Matlab Intelligent Algorithm Analysis about 30 Cases, Beihang University Press, Beijing, China, 1st edition, 2011.