Research Article
Transportation Planning through GIS and Multicriteria Analysis: Case Study of Beijing and XiongAn
Table 2
Prioritization matrix of criteria and weights.
| Criteria | F1 | F2 | F3 | F4 | F5 | F6 | F7 | F8 | F9 | F10 | Weight |
| F1: Cost for travel | 1 | 1/2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 0,15 |
| F2: Travel time | 2 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0,16 |
| F3: Type of infrastructure | 1/3 | 1/5 | 1 | 1/3 | 1/3 | 1/4 | 1/4 | 1/3 | 1/3 | 1/3 | 0,03 |
| F4: Connections | 1/3 | 1/3 | 3 | 1 | 1/3 | 1/3 | 1/4 | 3 | 3 | 1/2 | 0,08 |
| F5: Comfort | 1/2 | 1/3 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1/5 | 1/5 | 1/3 | 3 | 1/2 | 0,07 |
| F6: Reliability | 1 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 1/2 | 1/2 | 3 | 1 | 0,13 |
| F7: Level of safety | 1 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0,15 |
| F8:Accessibility | 1/4 | 1/2 | 3 | 1/3 | 3 | 2 | 1/2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0,10 |
| F9:Type of terminal connection | 1/4 | 1/2 | 3 | 1/3 | 1/3 | 1/3 | 1/2 | 1/3 | 1 | 1 | 0,04 |
| F10:Environmentaly friendly transport | 1/2 | 1/2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0,10 |
| CI= 0.097 |
|
|