Research Article

Minimizing Metro Transfer Waiting Time with AFCS Data Using Simulated Annealing with Parallel Computing

Table 6

Comparison of line-based TWT with EO and OO.

Line IDTransfer volume
(pass)
Total TWT
(min)
Average TWT (min/pass)Difference
(min)
Percentage
change
EOOOEOOOEOOO

AM peak

133,18333,21857,844.536,066.31.741.09-21,778.2-37.6%
220,02320,00727,737.925,668.81.391.28-2,069.1-7.5%
315,44815,43440,463.529,568.42.621.92-10,895.1-26.9%
49,9089,90330,699.827,868.93.102.81-2,830.9-9.2%
511,65711,64131,205.329,627.72.682.55-1,577.6-5.1%
618,22818,20154,038.548,111.42.962.64-5,927.1-11.0%
74,7544,77111,834.611,703.42.492.45-131.2-1.1%
810,73610,75115,356.815,885.21.431.48528.4+3.4%
96,6986,70723,113.823,516.43.453.51402.6+1.7%
108,0678,06925,751.328,177.63.193.492,426.3+9.4%
Total138,702138,702318,046.0276,194.12.291.99-41,851.9-13.2%

Off-peak

13,5253,47111,206.28,977.63.182.59-2,228.6-19.9%
23,2343,1519,881.67,352.63.062.33-2,529.0-25.6%
31,8141,8236,370.04,759.73.512.61-1,610.3-25.3%
41,3321,4195,188.35,182.33.903.65-6.0-0.1%
52,7202,6679,325.98,620.93.433.23-705.0-7.6%
61,9161,8806,537.56,511.03.413.46-26.5-0.4%
72,3112,3957,259.97,001.73.142.92-258.2-3.6%
81,8021,8725,630.85,193.23.122.77-437.6-7.8%
91,9912,0178,077.37,026.34.063.48-1,051.0-13.0%
101,4621,4125,810.04,839.43.973.43-970.6-16.7%
Total22,10722,10775,287.565,464.73.412.96-9,822.8-13.0%