Defining Reserve Times for Metro Systems: An Analytical Approach

Table 6

Energy variations in the case of the 90th percentile.

[min]	NC				[kWh]	[kWh]	[kWh]	[kWh]	Reduction in energy consumption
5.5	14	0.0%	–	57	–	32.7	32.7	5,487.9	4.91%
5.5	14	41.0%	65	61	20.5	20.3	40.8	6,852.5	6.13%
5.5	14	100.0%	58	–	39.8	–	39.8	6,688.6	5.98%
6.0	13	0.0%	–	51	–	44.2	44.2	6,888.6	6.64%
6.0	13	44.9%	61	57	34.0	32.7	66.7	10,402.0	10.02%
6.0	13	100.0%	53	–	56.1	–	56.1	8,751.5	8.43%
7.0	11	0.0%	–	57	–	32.7	32.7	4,311.9	4.91%
7.0	11	41.0%	65	61	20.5	20.3	40.8	5,384.1	6.13%
7.0	11	100.0%	58	–	39.8	–	39.8	5,255.4	5.98%
8.0	10	0.0%	–	44	–	44.1	44.1	5,290.4	6.63%
8.0	10	47.3%	54	52	50.2	38.9	89.1	10,687.9	13.39%
8.0	10	100.0%	45	–	67.5	–	67.5	8,104.5	10.15%
9.0	9	0.0%	–	42	–	57.8	57.8	6,246.2	8.69%
9.0	9	47.8%	51	49	59.3	49.1	108.4	11,709.0	16.30%
9.0	9	100.0%	65	–	20.5	–	20.5	2,215.4	3.08%
10.0	8	0.0%	–	44	–	44.1	44.1	4,232.3	6.63%
10.0	8	47.3%	54	52	50.2	38.9	89.1	8,550.3	13.39%
10.0	8	100.0%	45	–	67.5	–	67.5	6,483.6	10.15%
12.0	7	0.0%	–	36		68.0	68.0	5,233.1	10.22%
12.0	7	48.6%	45	44	67.5	44.1	111.6	8,595.1	16.78%
12.0	7	100.0%	37	–	95.2	–	95.2	7,328.9	14.31%
14.0	6	0.0%	–	36	–	68.0	68.0	4,485.5	10.22%
14.0	6	48.6%	45	44	67.5	44.1	111.6	7,367.2	16.78%
14.0	6	100.0%	37	–	95.2	–	95.2	6,281.9	14.31%
15.0	6	7.1%	61	30	34.0	90.1	124.1	7,447.5	18.66%
15.0	6	49.2%	39	38	80.3	70.7	150.9	9,056.9	22.69%
15.0	6	91.4%	31	57	108.0	32.7	140.7	8,439.3	21.14%