Defining Reserve Times for Metro Systems: An Analytical Approach

Table 8

Energy variations in the case of the 99th percentile.

[min]	NC				[kWh]	[kWh]	[kWh]	[kWh]	Reduction in energy consumption
6.0	13	0.0%	–	59	–	24.6	24.6	3,830.2	3.69%
6.0	13	33.3%	68	62	16.5	20.7	37.2	5,802.0	5.59%
6.0	13	100.0%	61	–	34.0	–	34.0	5,306.1	5.11%
8.0	10	0.0%	–	49	–	49.1	49.1	5,894.9	7.38%
8.0	10	44.6%	58	55	39.8	36.3	76.1	9,133.8	11.44%
8.0	10	100.0%	50	–	60.7	–	60.7	7,285.0	9.13%
9.0	9	0.0%	–	45	–	48.1	48.1	5,191.6	7.23%
9.0	9	46.0%	55	52	49.8	38.9	88.7	9,581.7	13.34%
9.0	9	100.0%	45	–	67.5	–	67.5	7,294.0	10.15%
10.0	8	0.0%	–	49	–	49.1	49.1	4,715.9	7.38%
10.0	8	47.7%	58	55	39.8	36.3	76.1	7,307.0	11.44%
10.0	8	100.0%	50	–	60.7	–	60.7	5,828.0	9.13%
12.0	7	0.0%	–	38	–	70.7	70.7	5,443.3	10.63%
12.0	7	47.7%	48	46	65.5	49.9	115.4	8,887.8	17.35%
12.0	7	100.0%	39	–	80.3	–	80.3	6,179.7	12.06%
14.0	6	0.0%	–	38	–	70.7	70.7	4,665.7	10.63%
14.0	6	47.7%	48	46	65.5	49.9	115.4	7,618.1	17.35%
14.0	6	100.0%	39	–	80.3	–	80.3	5,296.9	12.06%
15.0	6	2.3%	69	31	13.5	78.1	91.6	5,497.0	13.77%
15.0	6	48.8%	40	39	81.2	54.6	135.8	8,146.4	20.41%
15.0	6	95.4%	32	63	108.5	16.4	125.0	7,499.8	18.79%