Capacity Impacts and Optimal Geometry of Automated Cars’ Surface Parking Facilities

<div>Optimal layouts for square facilities with 500′ sides. Panel: (a) human “small” (790 parking spaces), (b) human “large” (760 spaces), (c) AV “front-in” (814 spaces), (d) AV “reverse-in” (1036 spaces), (e) AV “toing/froing” (1080 spaces), and (f) AV “translation” maneuvers (1080 spaces).</div>

Journal of Advanced Transportation

fig2

Figure 2

Figure 2: Capacity Impacts and Optimal Geometry of Automated Cars’ Surface Parking Facilities 