Research Article

Capacity Impacts and Optimal Geometry of Automated Cars’ Surface Parking Facilities

Table 1

Percentage difference in parking capacity between two human parking space dimensions (“small” and “large”) and dimensions required for the four AV maneuvers (“front-in,” “reverse-in,” “toing/froing,” and “translation”). Values in each cell represent mean (standard deviation), calculated across square facilities with sides 100′ to 1000′ in 1′ increments.

Human “small”Human “large”

AV “front-in”+10.9% (6.9%)+15.0% (7.1%)
AV “reverse-in”+34.2% (7.9%)+39.1% (8.1%)
AV “toing/froing”+40.8% (8.3%)+45.9% (8.5%)
AV “translation”+44.0% (8.5%)+49.3% (8.7%)