Research Article
Signal Timing Optimization for Corridors with Multiple Highway-Rail Grade Crossings Using Genetic Algorithm
Table 5
Pedestrian phase cutoffs for the scenarios with EB trains.
| ā | One train in EB | Three trains in EB | Five trains in EB |
| 33rd St intersection | Scenario 0-E-1 | Scenario 1-E-1 | Scenario 0-E-3 | Scenario 1-E-3 | Scenario 0-E-5 | Scenario 1-E-5 |
| # of ped cutoffs | 35 | 0 | 88 | 1 | 131 | 6 | # of ped events | 50 | 50 | 150 | 150 | 228 | 229 | % pedestrian phase cutoffs | 70.0% | 0.0% | 58.7% | 0.7% | 57.5% | 2.6% | Reduction | 100.0 | 98.9 | 95.4 |
| 35th St intersection | Scenario 0-E-1 | Scenario 1-E-1 | Scenario 0-E-3 | Scenario 1-E-3 | Scenario 0-E-5 | Scenario 1-E-5 |
| # of ped cutoffs | 27 | 0 | 79 | 2 | 118 | 14 | # of ped events | 50 | 50 | 150 | 150 | 231 | 231 | % pedestrian phase cutoffs | 54.0% | 0.0% | 52.7% | 1.3% | 51.1% | 6.1% | Reduction | 100.0 | 97.5 | 88.1 |
| 44th St intersection | Scenario 0-E-1 | Scenario 1-E-1 | Scenario 0-E-3 | Scenario 1-E-3 | Scenario 0-E-5 | Scenario 1-E-5 |
| # of ped cutoffs | 28 | 0 | 81 | 0 | 133 | 15 | # of ped events | 50 | 50 | 143 | 143 | 238 | 238 | % pedestrian phase cutoffs | 56.0% | 0.0% | 56.6% | 0.0% | 55.6% | 6.3% | Reduction | 100.0 | 100.0 | 88.7 |
|
|