Research Article

Decision Support Framework for Cycling Investment Prioritization

Table 4

Evaluation table with scoring, preference functions, min/max, thresholds values and criteria weights.

Cross section profilePCIMaximum altitude differenceRoad alignmentSignage qualityTraffic flow speedAADTBike lane or mixed traffic laneCycling safetyCapacities for food, drinks and accommodation capacitiesBike parking, repair services and bicycle rental locationsVicinity of cultural and historical attractions, natural sightsBike path construction costsLand use value, population around bike sectionTouristic and economic development

Preference parameters

Min/Maxmaxmaxminmaxmaxminminmaxmaxmaxmaxmaxminmaxmax
Weight5.007.008.007.006.006.007.009.006.007.006.008.008.005.006.00
Preference Fn.V-shapeV-shapeLinearV-shapeV-shapeV-shapeV-shapeV-shapeV-shapeV-shapeV-shapeV-shapeV-shapeV-shapeV-shape
Preference3.003.00800.003.004.0040.00450015.000.504.000.503.001000003.003.00

Evaluations

Section 1: D. Brijeg - Kamen.6.504.00705.004.0070.00350010.003.004.003.005.002500005.005.00
Section 2: Kamenari -Trojica6.504.00605.005.0060.00500015.003.005.003.005.002500005.005.00
Section 3: Trojica - Cetinje4.002.0010502.001.0040.005000.002.003.002.005.001500004.004.00
Section 4: Cetinje - Virpazar5.002.007002.003.0060.005000.002.002.002.003.001500003.003.00
Section 5: Virpazar - Ostros4.002.004002.001.0040.005000.002.003.002.004.001500003.004.00
Section 6: Ostros - Sukobin3.503.004802.004.0050.005000.002.003.002.004.001500003.004.00

Statistics

Minimum3.52.0602.01.040.05000.02.02.02.03.01500003.03.0
Maximum6.54.010505.05.070.0500015.03.05.03.05.02500005.05.0
Average4.92.84603.03.053.317504.22.33.32.34.31833333.84.2
Standard Dev.1.20.93471.41.511.118206.10.50.90.50.7471400.90.7