Research Article
A Case Study in China to Determine Whether GPS Data and Derivative Indicator Can Be Used to Identify Risky Drivers
Table 1
GPS data and derivative indicator.
| Driver | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 1 | 64.7 | 0.23 | 0.23 | 0.26 | 0.31 | 3.04 | 1.99 | 4.35 | 2.19 | 109.7 | 1.62 | 2.36 | 2 | 63.8 | 0.27 | 0.25 | 0.31 | 0.33 | 3.22 | 2.36 | 4 | 2.69 | 117.6 | 1.88 | 2.40 | 3 | 63.9 | 0.25 | 0.24 | 0.31 | 0.34 | 3.16 | 2.18 | 5.62 | 2.35 | 129.9 | 1.71 | 2.15 | 4 | 58.2 | 0.19 | 0.18 | 0.22 | 0.27 | 1.06 | 2.03 | 3.03 | 2.62 | 104.6 | 1.12 | 2.88 | 5 | 61.9 | 0.28 | 0.23 | 0.31 | 0.29 | 2.82 | 1.95 | 4.6 | 2.41 | 129.3 | 1.55 | 2.50 | 6 | 64 | 0.23 | 0.21 | 0.27 | 0.28 | 1.24 | 1.88 | 3.69 | 1.86 | 106.2 | 1.38 | 2.33 | 7 | 71.4 | 0.28 | 0.29 | 0.32 | 0.43 | 3.53 | 3.06 | 3.91 | 3.12 | 114.7 | 1.80 | 3.37 | 8 | 63.7 | 0.26 | 0.27 | 0.29 | 0.29 | 2.98 | 2.55 | 3.24 | 2.37 | 119.7 | 2.15 | 1.92 | 9 | 64.3 | 0.28 | 0.23 | 0.33 | 0.33 | 1.95 | 1.87 | 4.16 | 1.98 | 131.6 | 1.82 | 2.76 | 10 | 64.2 | 0.26 | 0.21 | 0.32 | 0.36 | 0.93 | 2.18 | 3.79 | 2.37 | 122.9 | 1.20 | 2.73 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 41 | 62.4 | 0.34 | 0.29 | 0.42 | 0.47 | 3.38 | 2.85 | 5.28 | 3.29 | 117.8 | 1.57 | 2.83 | 43 | 84.1 | 0.20 | 0.23 | 0.20 | 0.22 | 2.15 | 1.87 | 3.62 | 2.39 | 135.7 | 1.78 | 1.90 | 44 | 76.6 | 0.14 | 0.16 | 0.17 | 0.26 | 1.6 | 2.2 | 2.36 | 1.42 | 132.5 | 0.89 | 2.06 | 45 | 60.1 | 0.36 | 0.34 | 0.40 | 0.42 | 0.18 | 1.5 | 1.67 | 1.96 | 109.7 | 1.99 | 2.66 | 46 | 59.9 | 0.30 | 0.24 | 0.35 | 0.33 | 3.25 | 3.77 | 4.12 | 3.07 | 123.1 | 1.37 | 2.13 | 47 | 61.9 | 0.33 | 0.27 | 0.45 | 0.45 | 2.03 | 2.67 | 4.5 | 2.86 | 114.4 | 1.72 | 2.46 | 48 | 65.4 | 0.30 | 0.26 | 0.35 | 0.39 | 2.67 | 2.25 | 4.08 | 2.69 | 113.7 | 1.32 | 3.19 | 49 | 64.1 | 0.31 | 0.32 | 0.38 | 0.41 | 1.94 | 2.1 | 3.56 | 3.24 | 121.7 | 1.96 | 2.37 | 50 | 60.5 | 0.35 | 0.28 | 0.44 | 0.51 | 3.03 | 3.2 | 4.3 | 1.96 | 114.2 | 1.69 | 3.40 |
|
|