Research Article

An Analysis of Habitual Mode Use in the Years of Rising Oil Prices

Table 6

Probit results of passenger car users.

Random effects probitDynamic random effects probit
VariablesCoef.S.E.t-valuep-valueCoef.S.E.t-valuep-value

Lcar2.1870.05837.7000.0001.7110.12613.5900.000

Female-0.1280.053-2.4400.015-0.2040.063-3.2400.001

Age 20s0.2360.1042.2700.0230.2250.1151.9600.050

Age 30s0.3410.1013.3900.0010.5060.1224.1500.000

Age 40s0.3510.1013.4900.0000.5490.1274.3200.000

Age 50s0.1310.1031.2700.2050.2860.1232.3200.020

Seoul_m-0.2520.054-4.6900.000-0.3620.069-5.2600.000

Time-0.0050.001-6.6100.000-0.0060.001-6.7000.000

Vehicles0.1620.0413.9400.0000.2060.0484.3100.000

Self_emp0.2070.0762.7200.0060.3230.0923.5300.000

Hchg0.0590.1000.5900.5540.0590.1050.5600.573

Jchg-0.0270.087-0.3100.758-0.0200.091-0.2200.829

Mid income0.0890.0721.2400.2170.1610.0831.9500.051

High income0.1480.0771.9100.0560.2310.0892.5800.010

Oil dummy-0.5590.053-10.4700.000-0.5800.057-10.2400.000

const-1.1000.116-9.4600.000-0.9150.135-6.8000.000

rho0.1620.0722.2400.025

theta3.9741.5332.5900.010

obs39323932

Log likelihood (0)-2701.45-2701.45

Log likelihood (c)-1483.60-2640.81

Chi-sq(df=15)2435.71923.95

Note: reference variable is age 60+. reference variable is low income.