Research Article

An Analysis of Habitual Mode Use in the Years of Rising Oil Prices

Table 8

Probit results of nonmotorized vehicle users.

Random effects probitDynamic random effects probit
VariablesCoef.S.E.t-valuep-valueCoef.S.E.t-valuep-value

Lnon-motor2.7100.09129.8200.0001.9410.17710.9600.000

Female-0.0730.077-0.9500.343-0.0680.098-0.6900.490

Age 20s-0.1030.134-0.7700.442-0.2160.170-1.2700.203

Age 30s-0.1570.131-1.2000.230-0.3880.178-2.1800.029

Age 40s-0.3110.136-2.2800.022-0.5490.185-2.9700.003

Age 50s-0.0320.135-0.2300.815-0.2060.180-1.1400.252

Seoul_m-0.0530.078-0.6700.502-0.0940.103-0.9100.364

Time-0.0100.002-6.4600.000-0.0160.003-5.5800.000

Vehicles0.0490.0570.8500.3930.0290.0750.3800.702

Self_emp-0.1760.115-1.5200.128-0.2830.155-1.8300.067

Hchg-0.0140.148-0.1000.923-0.0870.174-0.5000.615

Jchg0.0490.1230.4000.6900.0260.1430.1800.855

Mid income-0.1880.096-1.9700.049-0.3690.133-2.7800.005

High income-0.3390.109-3.1200.002-0.6020.163-3.7000.000

Oil dummy0.4180.0795.3100.0000.4900.0925.3400.000

const-1.4180.154-9.1900.000-1.1180.204-5.4700.000

rho0.3910.1193.2800.001

theta2.2450.6993.2100.001

obs39323932

Log likelihood (0)-1378.06-1384.24

Log likelihood (c)-635.93-1185.73

Chi-sq(df=15)1484.27397.01

Note: reference variable is age 60+. reference variable is low income.