Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Advanced Transportation
Volume 2019, Article ID 9893615, 15 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/9893615
Review Article

Critical Literature Review into Planning of Inter-Terminal Transport: In Port Areas and the Hinterland

1Department of Marine and Transport Technology, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands
2Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Department of Transport & Planning, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands
3Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, ETH Zurich, Switzerland
4School of Aviation, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia

Correspondence should be addressed to Qu Hu; ln.tfledut@uh.q

Received 3 January 2019; Revised 17 April 2019; Accepted 7 May 2019; Published 10 June 2019

Academic Editor: Stefano de Luca

Copyright © 2019 Qu Hu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. I. Racunica and L. Wynter, “Optimal location of intermodal freight hubs,” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 453–477, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. S.-J. Jeong, C.-G. Lee, and J. H. Bookbinder, “The European freight railway system as a hub-and-spoke network,” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 523–536, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. I. F. A. Vis and R. De Koster, “Transshipment of containers at a container terminal: an overview,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 147, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. L. Heilig and S. Voss, “Inter-terminal transportation: an annotated bibliography and research agenda,” Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 35–63, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. M. Janic, A. Reggiani, and P. Nijkamp, “Sustainability of the European freight transport system: evaluation of innovative bundling networks,” Transportation Planning and Technology, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 129–156, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. Google, “About Google Scholar,” 2018, https://scholar.google.com/intl/en/scholar/about.html.
  7. C. Brakewood and K. Watkins, “A literature review of the passenger benefits of real-time transit information,” Transport Reviews, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 327–356, 2019. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. J. A. Ottjes, H. P. M. Veeke, M. B. Duinkerken, J. C. Rijsenbrij, and G. Lodewijks, “Simulation of a multiterminal system for container handling,” OR Spectrum, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 447–468, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. J. J. M. Evers and R. De Feijter, “Centralized versus distributed feeder ship service: The case of the Maasvlakte harbour area of Rotterdam,” Transportation Planning and Technology, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 367–384, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. A. H. Gharehgozli, R. de Koster, and R. Jansen, “Collaborative solutions for inter terminal transport,” International Journal of Production Research, vol. 55, no. 21, pp. 6527–6546, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. A. M. Douma, P. C. Schuur, and J. M. J. Schutten, “Aligning barge and terminal operations using service-time profiles,” Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 385–421, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. I. A. Hansen, “Automated shunting of rail container wagons in ports and terminal areas,” Transportation Planning and Technology, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 385–401, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. L. Heilig, E. Lalla-Ruiz, and S. Voss, “port-IO: an integrative mobile cloud platform for real-time inter-terminal truck routing optimization,” Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, vol. 29, no. 3-4, pp. 504–534, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. A. Douma, M. Schutten, and P. Schuur, “Waiting profiles: an efficient protocol for enabling distributed planning of container barge rotations along terminals in the port of Rotterdam,” Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 133–148, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. A. M. Douma, J. Van Hillegersberg, and P. C. Schuur, “Design and evaluation of a simulation game to introduce a Multi-Agent system for barge handling in a seaport,” Decision Support Systems, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 465–472, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. L. R. De Lange, Generator for future inter terminal container transport demand scenarios on the Maasvlakte 1 and 2 [M.S. thesis], Erasmus University of Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands, 2014.
  17. E. J. Gerritse, “Analysis for inter terminal transportation demand scenarios for the Maasvlakte I and II in 2030,” Tech. Rep., Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  18. M. B. Duinkerken, R. Dekker, S. T. G. L. Kurstjens, J. A. Ottjes, and N. P. Dellaert, “Comparing transportation systems for inter-terminal transport at the Maasvlakte container terminals,” OR Spectrum, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 469–493, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. L. Zhen, S. Wang, and K. Wang, “Terminal allocation problem in a transshipment hub considering bunker consumption,” Naval Research Logistics (NRL), vol. 63, no. 7, pp. 529–548, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. M. P. M. Hendriks, D. Armbruster, M. Laumanns, E. Lefeber, and J. T. Udding, “Strategic allocation of cyclically calling vessels for multi-terminal container operators,” Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 248–273, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. C. Caballini, C. Pasquale, S. Sacone, and S. Siri, “An event-triggered receding-horizon scheme for planning rail operations in maritime terminals,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 365–375, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. C. Caballini, S. Fioribello, S. Sacone, and S. Siri, “An MILP optimization problem for sizing port rail networks and planning shunting operations in container terminals,” IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 1492–1503, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. S. Li, R. R. Negenborn, and G. Lodewijks, “Planning inland vessel operations in large seaports using a two-phase approach,” Computers & Industrial Engineering, vol. 106, pp. 41–57, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. S. Li, R. R. Negenborn, and G. Lodewijks, “Closed-loop coordination of inland vessels operations in large seaports using hybrid logic-based benders decomposition,” Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, vol. 97, pp. 1–21, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. X. Jin and K. H. Kim, “Collaborative inter-terminal transportation of containers,” Industrial Engineering and Management Systems, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 407–416, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. L. Heilig, E. Lalla-Ruiz, and S. Voss, “Multi-objective inter-terminal truck routing,” Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, vol. 106, pp. 178–202, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. Q. Hu, F. Corman, B. Wiegmans, and G. Lodewijks, “A tabu search algorithm to solve the integrated planning of container on an inter-terminal network connected with a hinterland rail network,” Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, vol. 91, pp. 15–36, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. Q. Hu, B. Wiegmans, F. Corman, and G. Lodewijks, “Integration of inter-terminal transport and hinterland rail transport,” Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, 2019. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  29. D.-H. Lee, J. G. Jin, and J. H. Chen, “Terminal and yard allocation problem for a container transshipment hub with multiple terminals,” Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 516–528, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. S. Jacobsson, P. O. Arnäs, and G. Stefansson, “Differentiation of access management services at seaport terminals: facilitating potential improvements for road hauliers,” Journal of Transport Geography, vol. 70, pp. 256–264, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. X. Schepler, S. Balev, S. Michel, and É. Sanlaville, “Global planning in a multi-terminal and multi-modal maritime container port,” Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, vol. 100, pp. 38–62, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. N. Mishra, D. Roy, and J.-K. Van Ommeren, “A stochastic model for interterminal container transportation,” Transportation Science, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 67–87, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. H. Zheng, R. R. Negenborn, and G. Lodewijks, “Predictive path following with arrival time awareness for waterborne AGVs,” Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, vol. 70, pp. 214–237, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. H. Zheng, R. R. Negenborn, and G. Lodewijks, “Closed-loop scheduling and control of waterborne AGVs for energy-efficient Inter Terminal Transport,” Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, vol. 105, pp. 261–278, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. S. Limbourg and B. Jourquin, “Optimal rail-road container terminal locations on the European network,” Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 551–563, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. R. Konings, E. Kreutzberger, and V. Maraš, “Major considerations in developing a hub-and-spoke network to improve the cost performance of container barge transport in the hinterland: the case of the port of rotterdam,” Journal of Transport Geography, vol. 29, pp. 63–73, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. V. Roso and K. Lumsden, “A review of dry ports,” Maritime Economics & Logistics, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 196–213, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. S. Hanaoka and M. B. Regmi, “Promoting intermodal freight transport through the development of dry ports in Asia: an environmental perspective,” IATSS Research, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 16–23, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. D. Meers, T. Vermeiren, and C. Macharis, “Transferia: solving local pain or bringing global gain?” International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 148–159, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. F. Iannone and S. Thore, “An economic logistics model for the multimodal inland distribution of maritime containers,” International Journal of Transport Economics, pp. 281–326, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  41. F. Iannone, “A model optimizing the port-hinterland logistics of containers: the case of the Campania region in Southern Italy,” Maritime Economics & Logistics, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 33–72, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. R. Konings and H. Priemus, “Terminals and the competitiveness of container barge transport,” Transportation Research Record, no. 2062, pp. 39–49, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. S. Awad-Núñez, N. González-Cancelas, F. Soler-Flores, and A. Camarero-Orive, “How should the sustainability of the location of dry ports be measured? a proposed methodology using Bayesian networks and multi-criteria decision analysis,” Transport, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 312–319, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. H. Chen, K. Cullinane, and N. Liu, “Developing a model for measuring the resilience of a port-hinterland container transportation network,” Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, vol. 97, pp. 282–301, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. V. Roso, “Factors influencing implementation of a dry port,” International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, vol. 38, no. 10, pp. 782–798, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. F. Iannone, “The private and social cost efficiency of port hinterland container distribution through a regional logistics system,” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, vol. 46, no. 9, pp. 1424–1448, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. J. Jeevan, S.-L. Chen, and S. Cahoon, “Determining the influential factors of dry port operations: worldwide experiences and empirical evidence from Malaysia,” Maritime Economics & Logistics, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 476–494, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. T. Bektaş, J. F. Ehmke, H. N. Psaraftis, and J. Puchinger, “The role of operational research in green freight transportation,” European Journal of Operational Research, 2018. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. J. J. Trip and Y. Bontekoning, “Integration of small freight flows in the intermodal transport system,” Journal of Transport Geography, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 221–229, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. R. Konings, “Opportunities to improve container barge handling in the port of Rotterdam from a transport network perspective,” Journal of Transport Geography, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 443–454, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. A. Caris, C. Macharis, and G. K. Janssens, “Corridor network design in hinterland transportation systems,” Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 294–319, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. J. Zheng and D. Yang, “Hub-and-spoke network design for container shipping along the Yangtze River,” Journal of Transport Geography, vol. 55, pp. 51–57, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. F. An, H. Hu, and C. Xie, “Service network design in inland waterway liner transportation with empty container repositioning,” European Transport Research Review, vol. 7, no. 2, article 9, 2015. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. V. Maraš, “Determining optimal transport routes of inland waterway container ships,” Transportation Research Record, vol. 2062, no. 1, pp. 50–58, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. V. Maraš, J. Lazić, T. Davidović, and N. Mladenović, “Routing of barge container ships by mixed-integer programming heuristics,” Applied Soft Computing, vol. 13, no. 8, pp. 3515–3528, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. M. Lupi, A. Pratelli, M. Canessa, A. Lorenzini, and A. Farina, “A study on contestable regions in europe through the use of a new rail cost function: an application to the hinterland of the new container terminal of leghorn port,” Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2019. View at Google Scholar
  57. T. G. Crainic, P. Dell'Olmo, N. Ricciardi, and A. Sgalambro, “Modeling dry-port-based freight distribution planning,” Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, vol. 55, pp. 518–534, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. B. Van Riessen, R. R. Negenborn, R. Dekker, and G. Lodewijks, “Service network design for an intermodal container network with flexible transit times and the possibility of using subcontracted transport,” International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 457–478, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. S. Fazi and K. J. Roodbergen, “Effects of demurrage and detention regimes on dry-port-based inland container transport,” Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, vol. 89, pp. 1–18, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. F. Feng, Y. Pang, and G. Lodewijks, “Integrate multi-agent planning in hinterland transport: Design, implementation and evaluation,” Advanced Engineering Informatics, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 1055–1071, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. A. Veenstra, R. Zuidwijk, and E. Van Asperen, “The extended gate concept for container terminals: expanding the notion of dry ports,” Maritime Economics & Logistics, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 14–32, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. G. Wilmsmeier, J. Monios, and B. Lambert, “The directional development of intermodal freight corridors in relation to inland terminals,” Journal of Transport Geography, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 1379–1386, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  63. T. Notteboom and R. Konings, “Network dynamics in container transport by barge,” BELGEO, no. 4, pp. 461–477, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  64. I. Kotowska, M. Mańkowska, and M. Pluciński, “Inland shipping to serve the hinterland: the challenge for seaport authorities,” Sustainability, vol. 10, no. 10, article 3468, 2018. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  65. V. Roso, J. Woxenius, and K. Lumsden, “The dry port concept: connecting container seaports with the hinterland,” Journal of Transport Geography, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 338–345, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. A. K. Y. Ng, F. Padilha, and A. A. Pallis, “Institutions, bureaucratic and logistical roles of dry ports: The Brazilian experiences,” Journal of Transport Geography, vol. 27, pp. 46–55, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  67. A. Bask, V. Roso, D. Andersson, and E. Hämäläinen, “Development of seaport–dry port dyads: two cases from Northern Europe,” Journal of Transport Geography, vol. 39, pp. 85–95, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. J.-P. Rodrigue and T. Notteboom, “Dry ports in European and North American intermodal rail systems: two of a kind?” Research in Transportation Business and Management, vol. 5, pp. 4–15, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  69. L. Alfandari, T. Davidović, F. Furini et al., “Tighter MIP models for barge container ship routing,” Omega, vol. 82, pp. 38–54, 2019. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  70. A. D. Vasconcelos, C. D. Nassi, and L. A. S. Lopes, “The uncapacitated hub location problem in networks under decentralized management,” Computers & Operations Research, vol. 38, no. 12, pp. 1656–1666, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  71. Q. Meng and X. Wang, “Intermodal hub-and-spoke network design: incorporating multiple stakeholders and multi-type containers,” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 724–742, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  72. K. Yang, L. Yang, and Z. Gao, “Planning and optimization of intermodal hub-and-spoke network under mixed uncertainty,” Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, vol. 95, pp. 248–266, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  73. M. G. Speranza, “Trends in transportation and logistics,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 264, no. 3, pp. 830–836, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  74. B. Jourquin and M. Beuthe, “Transportation policy analysis with a geographic information system: the virtual network of freight transportation in Europe,” Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 359–371, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  75. B. Jourquin, “Calibration and validation of strategic freight transportation planning models with limited information,” Journal of Transportation Technologies, vol. 06, no. 05, pp. 239–256, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  76. D. Liu, Z. Deng, Q. Sun, Y. Wang, and Y. Wang, “Design and freight corridor-fleet size choice in collaborative intermodal transportation network considering economies of scale,” Sustainability, vol. 11, no. 4, article 990, 2019. View at Google Scholar