Did Attitudes Interpret and Predict “Better” Choice Behaviour towards Innovative and Greener Automotive Technologies? A Hybrid Choice Modelling Approach

Table 9

Estimation results for the measurement models of HCM.

Measurement model
LVconsumption		LVDesign		LVenvironment
Qcons		Qdesign		Qenv
α10	+0.567 (+3.46)	α20	−1.79 (−2.77)	α30	−1.89 (−24.48)
λ10	+0.725 (+11.40)	λ20	+0.148 (+ 0.85)	λ30	+0.495 (+ 14.12)
10	+0.787 (+16.37)	ν20	+1.38 (+33.16)	30	+1.18 (+31.06)
Icons2		Idesign1		Ienv3
α12	0	α21	0	α33	−1.36 (−19.03)
λ12	1	λ21	1	λ33	+0.729 (+20.82)
12	1	21	1	ν33	+0.983 (+25.99)
		Idesign3		Ienv4
		α23	+2.79 (+ 2.72)	α34	0
		λ23	+1.60 (+ 5.72)	λ34	1
		23	+1.43 (+ 31.24)	34	1
		Idesign4		Ienv6
		α24	+2.79 (+ 2.69)	α36	−1.95 (−26.15)
		λ24	+1.84 (+ 6.52)	λ36	+0.396 (+12.18)
		24	+1.65 (+ 28.17)	36	+1.13 (+31.80)

The t-test values are given in parenthesis. The indicators for each latent variable are highlighted in bold.