Research Article

What Motivates Drivers to Comply with Speed Guidance Information at Signalized Intersections?

Table 5

Analysis of model hypotheses (2015 and 2019 data).

PerceptionsSociodemographic characteristics20152019
Estimated parameters valueR2HypothesesEstimated parameters valueR2Hypotheses

Perception of innovating guidance informationGender−0.0220.7700.364Not supported−0.0110.7700.340Not supported
Age0.0340.418Not supported0.0260.538Not supported
Driving experience0.2050.015Supported0.1050.019Supported
Familiarity with the local road network0.0140.740Not supported0.0170.650Not supported
Education levels0.1410.048Supported0.080.026Supported
Type of driving behavior exhibited0.0130.740Not supported0.0150.680Not supported

Perception of convenience regarding guidance information transmissionGender0.0250.6720.360Not supported0.0250.7800.330Not supported
Age−0.1020.019Supported−0.1030.020Supported
Driving experience0.1320.705Not supported0.0650.679Not supported
Familiarity with the local road network0.0240.694Not supported0.0530.748Not supported
Education levels0.242Supported0.189Supported
Type of driving behavior exhibited0.0470.630Not supported0.0560.700Not supported

Perception of surrounding complexityGender−0.0410.3100.381Not supported−0.0410.3100.390Not supported
Age−0.0170.721Not supported−0.0170.721Not supported
Driving experience0.0100.767Not supported0.0480.332Not supported
Familiarity with the local road network0.0800.813Not supported0.0640.625Not supported
Education levels0.125Supported0.141Supported
Type of driving behavior exhibited−0.0270.356Not supported−0.0540.164Not supported

Individual innovationGender−0.060.4890.374Not supported−0.020.5920.450Not supported
Age−0.2040.012Supported−0.0930.033Supported
Driving experience0.156Supported0.1090.017Supported
Familiarity with the local road network0.132Supported0.138Supported
Education levels−0.0230.863Not supported−0.0020.960Not supported
Type of driving behavior exhibited0.0350.336Not supported0.0460.207Not supported

.