Research Article
Analysing the Impact of Pedestrian Network Centrality on Segment-Level Pedestrian Density
Table 3
Study site descriptive statistics (surveyed segments).
| Variable | Bangkok | Manila | Osaka | Taipei | All | Mean | St dev | Mean | St dev | Mean | St dev | Mean | St dev | Mean | St dev |
| Centrality (400 m) |
| Betweenness∗ | 752.60 | 434.30 | 405.93 | 154.91 | 326.30 | 115.85 | 356.51 | 140.43 | 444.25 | 285.64 | Closeness∗∗ | 402.10 | 33.28 | 381.77 | 19.81 | 377.33 | 9.89 | 379.88 | 14.40 | 384.35 | 22.29 | Straightness | 0.80 | 0.05 | 0.81 | 0.02 | 0.80 | 0.03 | 0.80 | 0.02 | 0.80 | 0.03 |
| Land Use (ground-level) |
| Prop. retail | 0.66 | 0.36 | 0.80 | 0.32 | 0.64 | 0.04 | 0.52 | 0.39 | 0.65 | 0.38 | Prop. residential | 0.19 | 0.32 | 0.03 | 0.08 | 0.04 | 0.12 | 0.16 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.22 |
| Urban Form |
| Distance to bus | 197.51 | 128.51 | 206.00 | 86.36 | 153.38 | 93.66 | 121.18 | 55.01 | 166.87 | 98.65 | Distance to metro | 281.72 | 128.51 | 269.30 | 124.38 | 100.46 | 67.65 | 215.29 | 112.36 | 208.97 | 140.99 | Path width (m) | 3.57 | 1.42 | 4.70 | 3.30 | 5.02 | 3.63 | 5.93 | 4.64 | 4.86 | 3.60 | Prop. exclusive paths | 0.76 | 0.43 | 0.74 | 0.44 | 0.77 | 0.41 | 0.60 | 0.49 | 0.72 | 0.45 |
|
|
∗Betweenness centrality values expressed ×104. ∗∗Closeness centrality values expressed ×105.
|