|
Technology | Strengths | Weaknesses |
|
Inductive loop | Flexible, well understood, provides basic traffic parameters, immune against weather condition, accurate. | Complex, very expensive, requires pavement cut, expensive maintenance, cannot detect vehicle classes. |
Magnetometer (two-axis fluxgate magnetometer) | Supports wireless communication, immune against weather conditions, better than the inductive loop for overloads of traffic | Same as the inductive loop. In addition, require multiple units for full lane detection. |
Magnetic (induction or search coil magnetometer) | Suitable for bridge decks, no pavement cuts for installation, better than the inductive loops to stresses of traffic. | Cannot detect stopped vehicles. |
Microwave radar | Immune against weather conditions, speed measurement, lane coverage. | Cannot detect stopped vehicles. |
Active infrared (laser radar) | Measurement of location, speed, and vehicle class Multiple lane operation. | Not working well in bad weather conditions. Installation and maintenance very expensive. |
Passive infrared | Speed measurement. | Not working in bad weather conditions. |
Ultrasonic | Multiple lane operation, height detection. | Not working well in bad weather conditions. Installation and maintenance very expensive. |
Video image processor | Multiple lanes, zones. Wide-area detection. | Installation and maintenance costs and efforts. Not working well in bad weather conditions. Very expensive. |
|