Analysing the Vulnerability of Public Transport Networks

Table 1

Structural properties in L-Space. Average Betweenness Centrality (<BC>), average degree (<k >), average Eigenvector Centrality (<EC>), average PageRank (with a damping factor = 0.85) (<PR>), average path Length (<l>), diameter (d), density, and MRP.

Network	Number of nodes	Number of links	<>	<>	>	<>	<l>	d	Density	MRP
Auckland	5,223	318,896	0.00655	2.36071	0.00217	0.00019	2.69523	151	0.00045	2.66878
EMT	4,636	2,070,508	0.00383	2.71140	0.00181	0.00022	1.00000	61	0.00058	3.21782
BC Transit	3,981	702,197	0.00233	2.28894	0.00167	0.00025	9.11427	83	0.00058	2.54653
Kolumbus	3,829	487,432	0.00258	2.59546	0.00216	0.00026	2.89389	98	0.00068	3.24314
STAR	1,415	661,150	0.00664	2.81696	0.00559	0.00071	10.0000	37	0.00199	3.54340
AVL, CFL, RGTR, and TICE	1,372	340,684	0.00706	2.81050	0.00564	0.00072	1.00000	34	0.00205	3.79201
Thunder Bay Transit	825	78,247	0.03499	2.17697	0.00560	0.00121	29.79	92	0.00264	2.35412
TransAntofagasta	650	724,362	0.02436	2.96308	0.00902	0.00154	16.78525	51	0.00456	3.46729
Linja-Karjala Oy	551	63,399	0.01611	2.55898	0.01497	0.00181	4.50476	29	0.00465	3.18865
CIT	346	9,366	0.02714	2.24855	0.01700	0.00289	2.33333	29	0.00651	2.75804