Analysing the Vulnerability of Public Transport Networks

Table 5

Structural properties in P-Space. Average Betweenness Centrality (<BC>), average degree (<k>), average Eigenvector Centrality (<EC>), average PageRank (with a damping factor = 0.85) (<PR>), average path Length (<l>), diameter (d), and density.

Network	Number of nodes	Number of links	<>	<>	<>	<>	<l>	d	Density
Auckland	5,223	8,079,095	0.00039	101.28508	0.02386	0.00019	2.69143	7	0.01940
EMT	4,010	25,263,108	0.00065	47.66983	0.04685	0.00025	3.59238	7	0.01189
BC Transit	3,981	15,737,729	0.00017	70.76714	0.03415	0.00025	2.65481	6	0.01778
Kolumbus	3,829	11,317,714	0.00028	78.98355	0.02584	0.00026	2.96889	7	0.02063
STAR	1,415	9,477,213	0.00137	43.11236	0.01862	0.00071	1.48276	6	0.03049
AVL, CFL, RGTR, and TICE	1,372	4,254,656	0.00120	48.42570	0.01791	0.00073	1.00000	6	0.03532
Thunder Bay Transit	825	2,014,779	0.00133	75.51030	0.02197	0.00121	2.09	4	0.09164
TransAntofagasta	650	31,171,307	0.00108	199.74769	0.03666	0.00154	1.70123	3	0.30778
Linja-Karjala Oy	551	1,167,682	0.00180	64.26860	0.03500	0.00181	1.47619	4	0.11685
CIT	346	135,740	0.00274	33.93478	0.03445	0.00289	1.00000	4	0.103578