Review Article
Survey on Deep Learning-Based Marine Object Detection
Table 2
Application of improved YOLO backbone network in maritime object detection.
| Algorithms (backbone) | Datasets | Scenarios | Improved method | Effect |
| YOLOv2 [71] | Small ship dataset | Small ship detection | Density-based spatial clustering (DBSCAN) | AUC: 0.960 TPR: 98.3% FPR: 3.5% | YOLOv3 [77] | SeaShip dataset | Ship detection | Loss function (GIOU) | mAP (SeaShip): 98.37% | Buoy dataset | PANet replaces FPN | mAP (Buoy dataset): 90.58% | YOLOv2 and CNN [12] | Pascal VOC | Ship detection | — | Recall: 77.12% | SMD | IoU: 66.69% | YOLOv3 [75] | Shanghai port surveillance video | Ship detection | — | Average acc.: 0.84 | YOLOv3 [79] | SeaShip dataset | Ship detection | CBAM | mAP increase 9.6% | YOLO [123] | Self-collected | Ship detection | — | Average acc.: 92.85% | YOLOv3 tiny [124] | From Internet | Ship detection | Dense connection spatial separate conv. | LSDM average acc.: 94% LSDM tiny: 93.5% | YOLOv3 [132] | LWIR | Object detection | — | [email protected] IoU: 0.97 | [email protected] IoU: 0.90 | [email protected] IoU: 0.29 | YOLOv3 [125] | SMD; PETS 2016 | Ship tracking | — | mAP: 41.2% | YOLOv2 [130] | Pascal VOC | Object detection | Pass through layer | Recall: 73.86% | SMD | Ship detection | Transfer learning | IoU: 60.79% |
|
|