Research Article

Friend-Invitation Promotion Scheme Used in Electric Carsharing: Empirical Analysis and Policy Implications

Table 1

Null hypotheses were used in the data analysis and their respective tests.

S/NContentsTests

1Ages in the samples of the new and old members originate from the same distributionOne-way ANOVA on ranks
2The median age of the new members is not greater than that of the old membersMann–Whitney Wilcoxon test
3The median number of successful friend invitations of the old scheme participants is not greater than that of the new scheme participantsMann–Whitney Wilcoxon test
4The median number of successful friend invitations per month of the new scheme participants is not greater than that of the old scheme participantsMann–Whitney Wilcoxon test
5The number of friend invitations in the samples of the new scheme participants who were invited by friends to register as a member and the other new scheme participants originates from the same distributionOne-way ANOVA on ranks
6The median number of friend invitations of the new scheme participants who were invited by friends to register as a member is not equal to that of the other new scheme participantsMann–Whitney Wilcoxon test
7The median age of the not-invited new members is not greater than that of the invited new membersMann–Whitney Wilcoxon test
8The median age of the scheme participants is not less than that of the other membersMann–Whitney Wilcoxon test
9During the first eight months in 2016, activeness in the samples of the old members and the invited new members originate from the same distributionOne-way ANOVA on ranks
10During the first eight months in 2016, the median activeness of the old members is not equal to that of the invited new membersMann–Whitney Wilcoxon test
11During the first eight months in 2016, the median activeness of the not-invited new members is not greater than that of the invited new membersMann–Whitney Wilcoxon test
12During the first eight months in 2016, the median of the old active members is not greater than that of the invited new active membersMann–Whitney Wilcoxon test
13During the first eight months in 2016, the median of the invited new active members is not greater than that of the not-invited new active membersMann–Whitney Wilcoxon test
14The median within the period from June 2016 to August 2016 of the invited new active members is not greater than that of the old active membersMann–Whitney Wilcoxon test
15The median within the period from June 2016 to August 2016 of the invited new active members is not greater than that of the not-invited new active membersMann–Whitney Wilcoxon test
16During the first eight months in 2016, the median of the invited new active members is not greater than that of the old active membersMann–Whitney Wilcoxon test
17During the first eight months in 2016, the median of the invited new active members is not greater than that of the not-invited new active membersMann–Whitney Wilcoxon test
18During the first eight months in 2016, for the invited new active members, in the samples of who made successful friend invitations and who did not make successful friend invitations originate from the same distributionOne-way ANOVA on ranks
19During the first eight months in 2016, for the invited new active members, the median of those who made successful friend invitations is not equal to that of those who did not make successful friend invitationsMann–Whitney Wilcoxon test
20During the first eight months in 2016, the median of the old active members is not greater than that of the invited new active membersMann–Whitney Wilcoxon test
21During the first eight months in 2016, the median of the not-invited new active members is not greater than that of the invited new active membersMann–Whitney Wilcoxon test
22During the first eight months in 2016, in the samples of the old active members and not-invited new active members originate from the same distributionOne-way ANOVA on ranks
23During the first eight months in 2016, the median of the old active members is not equal to that of the not-invited new active membersMann–Whitney Wilcoxon test
24During the first eight months in 2016, for the invited new active members, in the samples of those who made successful friend invitations and those who did not make successful friend invitations originate from the same distributionOne-way ANOVA on ranks
25During the first eight months in 2016, for the invited new active members, the median of those who made successful friend invitations is not equal to that of those who did not make successful friend invitationsMann–Whitney Wilcoxon test

and denote that an estimate is statistically significant at the level of 1% and 5%, respectively.