Research Article

Safety Effects of Horizontal Curve Design and Lane and Shoulder Width on Single Motorcycle Accidents in Norway

Table 5

Results of the statistical analysis. Significant results presented in bold font.

ParametersSignificanceOdds ratio95.0% CI for the odds ratio
LowerUpper

Lane width1.5–1.75 m0.3830.5180.1182.271
1.76–2.0 m0.0150.2080.0590.738
2.01–2.25 m0.1960.4760.1551.467
2.26–2.5 m0.5920.8060.3661.776
2.51–2.75 m0.2720.7030.3751.318
2.76–3.0 m0.383111
3.01–3.25 m0.5470.8590.5251.407
3.26–3.5 m0.9730.9890.5201.880

Shoulder width0–0.25 m0.881111
0.26–0.5 m0.8361.0470.6801.611
0.51–0.75 m0.5250.8370.4831.450
0.76–1.0 m0.7020.8170.2902.302
>1 m0.5140.6220.1502.586

RegionEast0.343111
Middle0.3040.6910.3411.398
North0.0410.5460.3050.975
South0.7300.8850.4441.765
West0.6590.8920.5361.483

Road typeCounty0.591111
European0.9511.0220.5202.008
District0.3510.7210.3621.435

Heavy vehicles<8%0.6530.8830.5121.521
8–12%0.838111
>12%0.7831.0750.6441.792

Curve type + High/low + Adjacent curvesStraight0.000111
Single curve + low0.01310.7391.65369.754
Single curve + high0.8630.9220.3672.318
Multiple opposite dir.0.00021.9938.46557.141
+ High + NOT OK
Multiple same dir.
+ High + NOT OK
Multiple opposite dir.0.0003.3412.0105.552
+ Low + NOT OK
Multiple same dir.0.0122.5821.2285.430
+ Low + NOT OK
Multiple opposite dir.0.00014.0636.21331.833
+ High + OK
Multiple same dir.0.00012.4423.74441.346
+ High + OK
Multiple opposite dir.0.0004.9702.7528.974
+ Low + OK
Multiple same dir.0.0542.4200.9845.952
 + Low + OK

Only one segment had this specific categorization