Research Article
Two-Echelon Location-Routing Problem with Time Windows and Transportation Resource Sharing
Table 10
Optimization result comparison by each algorithm.
| Instance | EMOPSO | NSGA-II | MOGA | TC ($) | NV | T (min) | TC ($) | NV | T (min) | TC ($) | NV | T (min) |
| 1 | 1576 | 6 | 16 | 1764 | 8 | 24 | 1656 | 7 | 23 | 2 | 1884 | 6 | 17 | 2182 | 7 | 27 | 1997 | 7 | 29 | 3 | 2099 | 8 | 22 | 2161 | 10 | 32 | 2228 | 11 | 30 | 4 | 2357 | 13 | 18 | 2502 | 14 | 21 | 2673 | 15 | 22 | 5 | 2658 | 15 | 19 | 2777 | 16 | 23 | 2715 | 17 | 21 | 6 | 3039 | 15 | 18 | 3261 | 17 | 31 | 3200 | 16 | 33 | 7 | 2854 | 13 | 23 | 2832 | 13 | 34 | 2901 | 14 | 30 | 8 | 3344 | 16 | 26 | 3469 | 17 | 40 | 3425 | 16 | 39 | 9 | 4001 | 17 | 35 | 4346 | 18 | 37 | 4169 | 17 | 39 | 10 | 4367 | 19 | 26 | 4601 | 19 | 28 | 4538 | 21 | 30 | 11 | 1695 | 6 | 27 | 1961 | 7 | 26 | 1874 | 8 | 24 | 12 | 1990 | 7 | 22 | 2167 | 7 | 34 | 2005 | 9 | 33 | 13 | 2294 | 8 | 21 | 2541 | 9 | 22 | 2479 | 10 | 25 | 14 | 2489 | 11 | 18 | 2629 | 12 | 27 | 2653 | 14 | 26 | 15 | 2896 | 14 | 13 | 3131 | 14 | 29 | 3101 | 16 | 28 | 16 | 3119 | 17 | 14 | 3216 | 19 | 26 | 3354 | 20 | 24 | 17 | 2849 | 15 | 19 | 2969 | 16 | 29 | 2998 | 17 | 35 | 18 | 3468 | 16 | 21 | 3485 | 17 | 27 | 3574 | 19 | 24 | 19 | 4106 | 16 | 21 | 4458 | 18 | 34 | 4210 | 19 | 36 | 20 | 4658 | 19 | 28 | 4919 | 20 | 38 | 4796 | 21 | 39 | Average | 2887 | 13 | 21 | 3069 | 14 | 29 | 3027 | 15 | 30 | t-test | | | | 9.3E − 08 | 7.9E − 07 | 2.0E − 07 | 1.4E − 08 | 1.8E − 08 | 4.8E − 07 |
|
|