Research Article
Computational Methods for Calculating Multimodal Multiclass Traffic Network Equilibrium: Simulation Benchmark on a Large-Scale Test Case
Table 4
Comparison between the performances of algorithms with homogeneous and heterogeneous users.
| Demand profile; quality indicator/method | Monoclass users | Multiclass users | (euros) | Improvement to compared to prob. | CT (hours) | Improvement to CT compared to smart SSP | (euros) | Improvement to compared to GBP | CT (hours) | Improvement to CT compared to SSP |
| MSA ranking | 0.47 | −40.03% | 105.62 | −9.28% | 1.38 | −24.32% | 132.26 | −9.74% | Gap-based prob. (GBP) | 0.42 | −23.88% | 101.81 | −5.33% | 1.11 | — | 137.52 | −14.10% | Probabilistic (prob.) | 0.34 | — | 98.12 | −1.53% | 1.23 | −10.81% | 143.19 | −18.81% | Step-size prob. (SSP) | 0.55 | −64.78% | 108.71 | −12.48% | 2.61 | −135.14% | 120.52 | — | Smart step-size prob. | 0.37 | −10.45% | 96.65 | — | 1.27 | −14.41% | 139.59 | −15.81% | Simulated annealing | 0.21 | 36.36% | 85.62 | 11.41% | 0.32 | 71.17% | 91.30 | 24.25% | Genetic algorithm | 0.27 | 18.48% | 72.84 | 24.64% | 0.54 | 51.35% | 83.78 | 30.49% |
|
|