Modelling the Accommodation Preferences of Tourists by Combining Fuzzy-AHP and GIS Methods

Table 5

FAHP preference comparison matrix.

	C1	C2	C3	C4	C5	C6
C1	(1, 1, 1)	(0.13, 0.21, 0.5)	(0.17, 1, 6)	(0.17, 2.35, 9)	(0.13, 0.33, 4)	(2, 4.90, 9)
C2	(2, 4.83, 8)	(1, 1, 1)	(4, 5.35, 8)	(2, 6.11, 9)	(0.25, 1.72, 6)	(6, 8.36, 9)
C3	(0.17, 1, 6)	(0.13, 0.19, 0.25)	(1, 1, 1)	(0.25, 2.21, 8)	(0.17, 0.34, 1)	(2, 4.51, 6)
C4	(0.11, 0.43, 6)	(0.11, 0.16, 0.5)	(0.13, 0.45, 3)	(1, 1, 1)	(0.11, 0.30, 3)	(0.25, 1.43, 7)
C5	(0.25, 3, 8)	(0.17, 0.58, 4)	(1, 2.95, 6)	(0.33, 3.35, 9)	(1, 1, 1)	(1, 5.36, 9)
C6	(0.13, 0.21, 0.5)	(0.11, 0.12, 0.17)	(0.17, 0.24, 0.5)	(0.14, 0.55, 4)	(0.13, 0.24, 1)	(1, 1, 1)