Energy Consumption Analysis of High-Speed Trains under Real Vehicle Test Conditions
Table 2
Actual energy consumption values of different EMU models on the Beijing–Tianjin intercity railway and Shanghai–Hangzhou high-speed railway at different speed levels and the values calculated by the model.
Beijing-Tianjin Intercity Railway
Vehicle model and energy consumption model
Speed (km/h)
Actual statistical energy consumption (kWh/10,000 ton km)
Actual statistical energy consumption (kWh/10000 ton km)
Model-calculated values (kWh/10,000 ton km)
Error (%)
CRH2C
130–180
236
240.4
−1.9
180–200
333.3
319.7
4.1
200–240
349.6
361.5
−3.4
240–300
379.9
377.5
0.6
CRH2B
120–140
200.7
200.7
0
140–160
232.9
232.9
0
160–200
295.3
295.3
0
CRH2E
100–140
212.1
213.7
−0.8
140–160
248.9
242.5
2.6
160–180
251.4
257.8
–2.6
180–220
276.8
275.2
0.6
CRH380AL
130–160
321.4
316.9
1.4
160–180
310.9
323.1
−3.9
180–200
331.1
327.2
1.2
200–220
333
330.5
0.8
220–240
332.2
333.0
−0.2
240–300
333.3
335.5
−0.7
CRH380BL
100–160
359
358.6
0.1
160–180
384.5
392.9
−2.2
180–200
417.8
400.6
4.1
200–240
388.5
400.6
−3.1
240–260
390.7
386.6
1.1
Note. CRH2C, CRH2B, and CRH2E fall into CRH2 series EMUs. The main difference lies in the power configuration and formation. CRH2C is 6M2T; CRH2B, and CRH2E are 8M8T; CRH2E is a full-row sleeper EMU train.