Research Article
Dynamic Sign Guidance Optimization for Crowd Evacuation considering Flow Equilibrium
Table 2
: Comparative results with different number of pedestrian.
| | | | | DSG (s) | SSG (s) | (%) | DSG (s) | SSG (s) | (%) | DSG (s) | SSG (s) | (%) |
| 10 | 17.09 | 17.09 | 0.00 | 9.83 | 9.83 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 15 | 17.04 | 17.04 | 0.00 | 9.76 | 9.76 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 20 | 17.08 | 17.08 | 0.00 | 9.77 | 9.77 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 25 | 17.07 | 17.07 | 0.00 | 9.72 | 9.72 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 30 | 17.18 | 17.18 | 0.00 | 10.65 | 10.65 | 0.00 | 0.86 | 0.86 | 0.00 | 35 | 17.16 | 17.16 | 0.00 | 11.33 | 11.33 | 0.00 | 1.54 | 1.54 | 0.00 | 40 | 17.12 | 17.12 | 0.00 | 12.21 | 12.21 | 0.00 | 2.18 | 2.18 | 0.00 | 45 | 18.36 | 19.11 | 3.92 | 13.01 | 13.27 | 1.96 | 2.99 | 3.07 | 2.61 | 50 | 20.34 | 22.72 | 10.48 | 15.26 | 16.33 | 6.55 | 5.44 | 6.55 | 16.95 | 100 | 26.43 | 29.55 | 10.56 | 18.59 | 21.33 | 12.85 | 8.85 | 11.49 | 22.98 | 150 | 32.75 | 38.69 | 15.35 | 22.9 | 27.16 | 15.68 | 13.07 | 17.42 | 24.97 | 200 | 44.51 | 58.21 | 23.54 | 31.28 | 40.42 | 22.61 | 21.44 | 30.58 | 29.89 | 250 | 62.84 | 92.70 | 32.21 | 48.57 | 68.34 | 28.93 | 38.78 | 58.51 | 33.72 | 300 | 82.14 | 136.05 | 39.63 | 62.45 | 99.28 | 37.10 | 52.69 | 89.44 | 41.09 | 350 | 104.68 | 182.21 | 42.55 | 79.37 | 139.42 | 43.07 | 69.52 | 129.64 | 46.37 | 400 | 130.21 | 228.6 | 43.04 | 96.36 | 178.49 | 46.01 | 86.52 | 168.76 | 48.73 |
|
|