Research Article

Impact of Road Environment on Drivers’ Preference to Merging Location Selection in Freeway Work Zone Merging Areas

Table 4

Logistic regression model estimation results for Location Ι.

Merging area: Location IBS.E.WaldDFSig.Exp (B)95% confidence interval
Lower boundUpper bound

Intercept−2.9152.1231.88510.170

Road conditionsRoad alignment−4.2221.6766.34210.1180.0150.0010.392
Number of closed lanes4.3931.9694.97810.0261.0120.0000.586
Length of closed lanes00

Road alignment conditionsStraight line segment−1.0241.8870.29510.5870.3590.00914.497
Horizontal curve segment−0.8411.7940.22010.6390.4310.01314.494
Longitudinal slope segment−0.4872.6120.03510.8520.6140.004102.816
Curve slope combination segment00

Traffic environment conditionsTraffic volume and composition3.2971.7423.58310.05827.0330.890821.442
Work space location3.1551.9162.71010.10023.4500.5481003.347
Work zone layout3.8452.5102.34510.12646.7410.3416405.209
Traffic organization and control measures00

Traffic control signsWork zone warning sign−24.870.00010.0000.0000.000
Speed limit sign−0.2891.2570.05310.8180.7490.0648.794
Merging guide sign00

Speed conditionsSpeed difference with front vehicle1.8582.1750.73010.3936.4130.090455.081
Speed difference with front side vehicle0.4521.7290.06810.7941.5720.05346.578
Speed difference with rear vehicle1.5432.4650.39210.5314.6810.037587.031
Speed difference with rear side vehicle00

Speed limit strategySingle-speed limit3.6951.3847.12710.00840.2382.670606.354
Repeated speed limit−0.2261.3520.02810.8670.7980.05611.290
Hierarchical speed limit00