Research Article
Modelling Road User Perceptions towards Safety, Comfort, and Chaos at Shared Space: The via Maqueda Case Study, Italy
Table 4
Ordered logit models for comfort perception.
| Variables | Coefficient | value | Odds ratio | 95% confidence interval for odds ratio | Lower | Upper |
| Model 1. Walking | Perception of infrastructure | 0.27 | 0.05 | 1.32 | 1.00 | 1.74 | Gender | 0.27 | 0.32 | 1.31 | 0.77 | 2.22 | Age groups | −0.26 | 0.04 | 0.77 | 0.60 | 0.99 | Road use frequency | −0.02 | 0.86 | 0.98 | 0.75 | 1.27 |
| Model 2. Cycling | Perception of infrastructure | 0.34 | 0.02 | 1.41 | 1.05 | 1.89 | Gender | 0.43 | 0.12 | 1.54 | 0.90 | 2.64 | Age groups | −0.13 | 0.33 | 0.88 | 0.68 | 1.14 | Road use frequency | 0.34 | 0.02 | 1.40 | 1.07 | 1.84 |
| Model 3. Using micromobility | Perception of infrastructure | 0.18 | 0.20 | 1.19 | 0.91 | 1.56 | Gender | −1.16 | ≤0.001 | 0.31 | 0.18 | 0.54 | Age groups | 0.35 | 0.01 | 1.41 | 1.10 | 1.81 | Road use frequency | −0.24 | 0.07 | 0.79 | 0.61 | 1.02 |
|
|
Statistically significant at 90% confidence level. Statistically significant at 95% confidence level. |