|
Constructs items | Reference sources |
|
Value identity | [4, 44] |
VI1 : improved travel efficiency |
VI2 : improved quality of life |
VI3 : health and environmental protection |
Convenience | [7] |
CON1 : short distance travel is more convenient |
CON2 : more convenient to connect to other transportation modes |
CON3 : easy to use and easy to learn |
CON4 : fully equipped facilities |
Economy | [45, 46] |
EC1 : reasonable price |
EC2 : more cost-effective than other travel modes |
EC3 : the APP faces very little traffic during use |
Comfort | [47] |
COM1 : good bike design and comfortable riding |
COM2 : roads smooth and no illegal road use occurs |
COM3 : no interference occurs from other factors, such as pedestrians, electric vehicles, or motorcycles |
COM4 : bike lanes are flat and continuous |
Perceived safety | [48] |
PS1 : cycling across the street is dangerous |
PS2 : bike lanes without isolation |
PS3 : mixed operation of motor vehicles and bikes |
PS4 : vulnerable to weather |
US | [29, 43] |
US1 : my expectations are satisfied |
US2 : I am satisfied with the ideal |
US3 : overall, I am satisfied with bike sharing |
UL | [4] |
UL1 : I would like to continue to use bike sharing |
UL2 : I would like to recommend bike sharing to my relatives and friends |
TC | [3] |
TC1 : average travel distance |
TC2 : average travel time |
TC3 : use frequency per week |
SD | [5] |
SD1 : age (in years) |
SD2 : occupation |
SD3 : income per month (RMB) |
|