Research Article

Machine Learning for Promoting Environmental Sustainability in Ports

Table 1

Problems and ML techniques for promoting environmental sustainability in maritime port logistics.

ArticlesAreasResearch scopeEnvironmental problemsMachine learningData collection methodsCase studies
Overall portSeasideYardLandsideEmissionWater pollutionNoise pollutionEnergy savingRenewable energySolid wasteInputTechniques (tools)Output

[24]Port performance evaluationPort assets, berth quantity, and geographical locationPRNet profit, cargo throughput, and NOx emissionsSecondary data sources17 Chinese ports
[28]Port performance evaluationFacility, vessel and other pollution incidentsKDEA smoothed graph for the distribution of pollution incidents probability densitySecondary data sources10 American ports
[49]Truck schedulingHistorical data, truck arrival time, administrative waiting start and end time; intermediate waiting start and end time; node-specific forecasting parameters, e.g., dispatching modes and storage policies; and external forecasting parameters, weather and traffic informationNN (BP)Waiting time, arrival rates that translates into a reduction of traffic congestion and air pollutionSecondary data sourcesAn empty container depot in Northern Germany
[50]Truck schedulingNumber of clusters and the archive containing n solutionsK-meansCluster centroidsSecondary data sourcesPort of Hamburg (Germany)
[31]Port performance evaluationBerth length, the number of cranes, terminal area for the efficiency estimation. City gross domestic product, variance inflation factors, and emissions control regulationsPRTEUs handled and the impact of emissions control regulationsSecondary data sources48 ports in Europe
[46]Yard crane demandThe average of the previous day load, the average of the previous week load, the same hour load for previous day, and the previous hour loadNN (BP) and SVMRTG crane demand of one hourPrimary data sourcesPort of Felixstowe in the UK
[40]BerthingMaximum continuous rate (MCR) measured by megawatt, shaft speedPREmissions (NOx, SOx, CO2, and CO)Primary data sourcesTwo ocean-going vessels in Australia
[48]Antiswing craneTrolley position, trolley speed, loading angle, and angular velocityNN (ANFIS)The driving force of the trolleySecondary data sources
[29]Port performance evaluationNumber of quay crane, acres, berth and depth, undesirable output (CO2), and desirable outputs (calls, throughput, and deadweight tonnage)SOMClusters of decision-making units (DMUs)Secondary data sources20 American container ports
[41]BerthingShip identification, position, speed, course, heading and navigational status, and timestampPREmissions (NOx, SO2, PM2.5, VOC, CO, NH3, CO, N2O, and CH4)Primary data sourcesPorts of Newcastle, Jackson, Botany, and Kembla in Australia
[44]BerthingObserved videoPCAThe background with low-rank property and the foreground with sparse propertyPrimary data sourcesUnknown
[37]Port performance evaluationRTGC number, block number, handling container specification, stevedoring full or empty category, handling volume for a task, and the number of clustersK-meansResource allocation for container terminalsSecondary data sourcesA container terminal on the east coast of China
[42]BerthingThe net tonnage, deadweight tonnage, actual handling volume, and efficiency of facilitiesGBoost, RF, NN (BP), PR, and KNNEnergy consumptionSecondary data sourcesJingtang port (China)
[25]Port performance evaluationCO2 emission driver factors of the city where the port is located are gross domestic product, total resident population, the number of port berth, total imports, total exports, the first industrial value, the secondary industrial value, the primary industrial value, gross industrial production, fixed assets investment in the tertiary industry, per capita income, railway freight volume, highway freight volume, and waterway freight volumeSpatial clusteringClusters of similar ports in terms of environmental sustainability (LISA cluster maps of PCD carbon emissions)Secondary data sources30 Chinese container ports
[32]Port performance evaluationNumber of berths, the length of the terminal, the number of staff, and the total fixed assetsPRCargo throughput, NOX emissions, SOX emissions, and solid waste containersSecondary data sources18 Chinese ports
[27]Port performance evaluationHighly correlated input variablesPCADeterminant factors of the survey are lean management, green operational practices, green behavior (green participation and green compliance), and green climateSurveyKaohsiung container port (Taiwan)
Determinant factors of the survey are lean management, green operational practices, green behavior (green participation, green compliance), and green climatePRGreen performance (financial and nonfinancial)
[45]Noise of moving ships in port areasDraught, speed, and ship-to-microphone distancePRSound emittedPrimary data sourcesIndustrial port of Livorno (Italy)
[51]Truck schedulingContainer features are cycle, type, weight, special (e.g., hazard shipping), agreement (between stakeholders), vessel departure time, distance (of two containers in the yard), customs clearance, dwell time, and final destinationHierarchical clusteringContainer groupsSecondary data sources, surveyPort of Altamira (Mexico) and Port of Genoa (Italy)
[30]Port performance evaluationEnergy consumption and number of employeesHierarchical clustering, PRTotal gross weight of goods, air pollutant emissions, and the rank of ports in terms of eco-efficiencySecondary data sources24 European container ports
[36]Indoor air quality prediction (RORO)CO concentration and load (number of cars)NN (BP)The reference flow rate of the ventilation systemSecondary data sourcesA liner between Egypt and Saudi Arabia ports
[38]BerthingETA features (date, time, and weekday) and ship features (ship type and length)SVMArrival time of vesselsSecondary data sources
[33]Air quality predictionFine particulate mass and fine particulate compositionPRAir qualityPrimary data sourcesLong Beach (US)
[12]AGVScheduled arrival, departure, and load/unload start time, planned berthing place, planned position of front and rear of the ship, and number of containers to load and unloadNN (BP)Availability of AGVsPrimary data sourcesHamburg container terminal (Germany)
[52]Container truck emissionsHighly correlated data of traffic and particle number concentrations (PNC)PCAPrincipal components (container truck volume, other vehicles volume, and PNC data)Secondary data sourcesWaigaoqiao port (China)
[34]Air quality predictionType of pollutant, the operating mode, and gross tonnage of shipsPREmissions (SO2, NOx, CO2, VOC, PM, and CO)Secondary data sourcesPorts of Ambarlı, Izmir, Mersin, and Kocaeli (Turkey)
[47]RTG craneEnergy consumption of hoist, gantry, and trolleyPRGeneral energy consumption of RTGSecondary data sourcesCasablanca port (Morocco)
[35]Air quality predictionMeteorological data, air quality data, and shipping activity dataRNN and LSTMEmissions (PM2.5, PM10, SO2, O3, NO2, CO)Secondary data sourcesBusan port (Korea)
[43]BerthingHourly data of energy (electricity) prices and load demandsLSTM, NN (BP), Elman, RBFDay-ahead prices of energySecondary data sourcesA navigation route in Australia
[26]Port performance evaluationHighly correlated input variablesPCAAir quality, rate of treatment of wastewater, standard-reaching rate of nearshore water, green coverage rate in developed areas, and expenditure on energy-saving investments per capitaSecondary data sources, survey15 Chinese seaports
Air quality, rate of treatment of wastewater, standard-reaching rate of nearshore water, green coverage rate in developed areas, and expenditure on energy-saving investments per capitaHierarchical clusteringThe rank of ports based on environmental sustainability features