Journal of Botany

Journal of Botany / 2010 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2010 |Article ID 701975 |

Kumar Kamal Anand, Ravi Kumar Srivastava, Lal Babu Chaudhary, "Analysis of Genetic Diversity in Astragalus rhizanthus Benth. ssp. rhizanthus var. rhizanthus (Fabaceae) Using Molecular Markers from India", Journal of Botany, vol. 2010, Article ID 701975, 9 pages, 2010.

Analysis of Genetic Diversity in Astragalus rhizanthus Benth. ssp. rhizanthus var. rhizanthus (Fabaceae) Using Molecular Markers from India

Academic Editor: Takashi Hashimoto
Received01 Sep 2009
Accepted23 Feb 2010
Published19 May 2010


Astragalus rhizanthus with three infraspecific taxa (i.e., A. rhizanthus ssp. rhizanthus var. rhizanthus, A. rhizanthus ssp. rhizanthus var. pindreensis, and A. rhizanthus ssp. candolleanus) is widely scattered in the Himalaya from Jammu and Kashmir to Uttarakhand provinces in India. Among them, A. rhizanthus ssp. rhizanthus var. rhizanthus exhibits enormous morphological diversity throughout its range of distribution. An assessment of genetic diversity studies was undertaken to understand the level and pattern of diversity, using Inter simple sequence repeats (ISSR), Random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) and Directed amplification of minisatellite DNA (DAMD) profiles. Fifteen ISSR, 18 RAPD and 6 DAMD primers were used to unravel the diversity among 20 genotypes collected from the known localities in the Indian Himalaya. A total of 242 bands from ISSR, 352 from RAPD and 142 from DAMD were obtained with an average of 92.23% polymorphism in the species. Pair-wise genetic similarity for the cumulative data was determined using Jaccard's similarity coefficient which varied from 0.19 to 0.84. A combined UPGMA dendrogram was generated which revealed that different genotypes exhibited their affinity according to their geographical distribution. Tree topology suggests the existence of two distinct groups of the genotypes. Gene diversity and Shannon's information index ( ) were estimated and these values were found higher in the genotypes collected from Jammu and Kashmir than Himachal Pradesh.

1. Introduction

Astragalus L., with about 2500–3000 species, is the largest genus of flowering plants in the world [13]. In India, it has about 80–90 species, chiefly distributed in the temperate to alpine regions of the Himalaya with the main center of diversity in the cold deserts of Lahul-Spiti (Himachal Pradesh) and Leh and Ladakh (Jammu and Kashmir) [4, 5] (Figure 1). A. rhizanthus Benth. with three infraspecific taxa, A. rhizanthus ssp. rhizanthus var. rhizanthus, A. rhizanthus ssp. rhizanthus var. pindreensis (Baker) Podl., and A. rhizanthus ssp. candolleanus (Benth.) Podl. occurs in the Himalaya from Afghanistan to Nepal and in India from Jammu and Kashmir to Uttarakhand [6], out of which A. rhizanthus ssp. rhizanthus var. rhizanthus exhibits enormous amount of morphological variations among different populations as observed during the examination of Indian Astragalus by one of us (L. B. Chaudhary) [7]. The taxon A. rhizanthus ssp. rhizanthus var. rhizanthus grows on the mountain slopes and near agriculture fields in dry, stony, or sandy soils in sparsely scattered and fragmented populations. The Indian women chewed the roots of the taxon to stimulate lactation. Astragalus roots are also used in herbal medicines in China and USA for the treatment of diabetes, nephritis, HIV infection, back pain, tumors of eyes, liver, throat, and chest and to enhance the immune system of the body after cancer therapy treatment [7]. In addition, due to overgrazing by animals like goats, sheep, and horses the populations of the taxon are also decreasing day by day. The taxon is mostly caespitose perennial herbs with thick woody rootstock and generally without distinct stem. The extensive survey in the Himalaya revealed that the species exhibits considerable amount of morphological variations especially in the length of stems and leaves, number, size, and shape of leaflets, length of bracts, flower size, length of calyx lobes, size of pods, density and orientations of hairs, and so forth on different parts of the plants within and between populations in different regions. Sometimes variations are so prominent either in the same population or among different populations or sometimes even on the same plant that creates doubt whether different individuals belong to the same or different taxon. Therefore, In view of the above, the genetic diversity of A. rhizanthus ssp. rhizanthus var. rhizanthus which has not been studied so far has been examined to understand the level and pattern of diversity for knowing the relationship of morphological variations in respect to their geographical distribution as well as to know the more diverse populations to suggest the conservation strategies using PCR-based methods in India.

In recent years a large number of molecular taxonomic works have been carried out to explain the different kinds of taxonomic problems in Astragalus [813]. The PCR-based methods (ISSR, RAPD, and DAMD) have also been used extensively for the comparison of the genetic materials of two individual plants. The Intersimple Sequence Repeats (ISSRS) markers generated from single-primer PCR reactions are scattered evenly throughout the genome and inherited in a dominant or codominant Mendelian fashion, and they circumvents the challenge of characterizing SSR loci that microsatellite requires [1418]. The Random Amplification of Polymorphic DNA (RAPD) technique provides a rapid assessment of the differences in the genetic composition of related individuals to access the genetic diversity [1921]. Similarly, Directed Amplification of Minisatellite DNA (DAMD) reveals polymorphism due to minisatellites [22]. Since DAMD is carried out in higher PCR stringencies the patterns produced have greater reproducibility. Therefore, the techniques like ISSR, RAPD, and DAMD, which provide many polymorphic bands, are efficient to unravel the intraspecific relationships amongst different genotypes of A. rhizanthus ssp. rhizanthus var. rhizanthus.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Collection of Plant Materials

The leaf samples were collected in the field in silica gel following Chase and Hills [23] for DNA extraction. A large number of samples were collected from all possible and known localities of the cold desert of Lahul-Spiti (Himachal Pradesh) and Leh and Ladakh (Jammu and Kashmir) in India out of which some 20 genotypes have been selected for ISSR, RAPD, and DAMD analyses (Table 1). The number of accessions collected from Jammu and Kashmir is lesser than Himachal Pradesh because the area is not congenial for frequent visit due to terrorist activities prevailing there. A closely related Fabaceae taxon, Oxytropis tatarica Bunge, was used as the out-group for comparison. The voucher specimens were prepared, labeled, and deposited in the herbarium of National Botanical Research Institute, Lucknow, India (LWG) and all were critically examined to record the range of morphological variations available within the taxon.

Sample no.LocalityLongitude/latitudeAltitudeCollection number

AR1Before Rohtang, Lahul-SpitiN 38˚ 3814 m229407
E 77˚
AR2Before Rohtang, Lahul-SpitiN 38˚ 3814 m229408
E 77˚
AR3Before Rohtang, Lahul-SpitiN 38˚ 3814 m229409
E 77˚
AR4Koksar, Lahul-SpitiN 32˚ 3136 m229416
E 77˚
AR5Koksar, Lahul-SpitiN 32˚ 3136 m229417
E 77˚
AR6Koksar, Lahul-SpitiN 38˚ 3134 m229421
E 77˚
AR7Koksar, Lahul-SpitiN 38˚ 3134 m229422
E 77˚
AR8Gondla, Lahul-SpitiN 32˚ 2905 m229463
E 76˚
AR9Gondla, Lahul-SpitiN 32˚ 2905 m229464
E 76˚
AR10Gondla, Lahul-SpitiN 32˚ 2905 m229466
E 76˚
AR11Gondla, Lahul-SpitiN 32˚ 2905 m229468
E 76˚
AR12Triloki Nath, Lahul-SpitiN 32˚ 3845 m229476
E 77˚
AR13Gondla and Sissu, Lahul-SpitiN 30˚ 2996 m229480
E 76˚
AR14Chota Dara, Lahul-SpitiN 32˚ 3475 m229485
E 77˚
AR15Chatru and Chota Dara, Lahul-SpitiN 32˚ 3027 m229493
E 77˚
AR16Chatru, Lahul-SpitiN 32˚ 3034 m229498
E 77˚
AR17Gramphu, Lahul-SpitiN 32˚ 2996 m229500
E 77˚
AR18Panikhar, Leh and LadakhN 34˚ 4200 mPANI-05
E 76˚
AR19Penzilla, Leh and LadakhN 33˚ 4800 mPANI-05
E 77˚
AR20Khardungla, Leh and LadakhN 34˚ 5000 m225052
E 77˚
OgTanglang La, Leh and LadakhN 33˚ 5200 m225038
E 77˚

AR: A. rhizanthus ssp. rhizanthus var. rhizanthus; Og: Oxytropis tatarica.
2.2. DNA Isolation

Silica gel dried leaf tissues (100 mg) were frozen in liquid nitrogen and grounded in mortar and pestle. The genomic DNA was extracted from the powdered leaf material using DNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA) as per the instructions of the manufacturer with minor modifications. Extracted DNA was quantified using ND-1000 spectrophotometer (Nanodrop, USA) and its quality was evaluated by gel electrophoresis on 0.8% agarose stained with ethidium bromide.

2.3. PCR Amplification with ISSR, RAPD, and DAMD Primers

A set of 100 anchored microsatellite primers procured from University of British Columbia, Canada were screened, out of which 15 primers generated reproducible polymorphic profiles were selected (Table 2). PCR amplification of 50 ng DNA was performed in 10 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 50 mM KCl, 2.0 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM dNTPs, 0.2  M primer, and 0.9 U Taq DNA (Bangalore Genei, India) in a 25  l reaction using PTC 200 thermocycler (MJ Research, Inc., USA). After initial denaturation at for 4 minutes, each cycle consisted of 1-minute denaturation at , 1 minute of annealing at , 2-minute extension at C, along with 7-minute extension at at the end of 35 cycles.

PrimerSequence ( )No. of loci amplifiedPolymorphic bands% Polymorphism




The RAPD primers were procured from Operon Tech. Inc. Alameda, CA, USA. In total, 80 decamer primers (B, C, N and U kits) were screened for PCR amplification. Out of which 18 primers that generated polymorphic profiles were selected for screening data for all the accessions in the present study (Table 2). The final RAPD reactions were carried out in 25  l volumes which contain 25 ng of template DNA, 10-pmole primer, 200  M of each dNTP, 2.5 mM Mg2+ ion concentration in suitable 1X assay buffer supplied, along with the enzyme and 0.5 units of the thermostable Taq DNA polymerase (Bangalore Genei, India). The amplification of DNA was performed on a PTC-200 thermocycler (MJ Research, Inc. USA), which was programmed to include predenaturation at for 1 minute, followed by 45 cycles of denaturation at for 1 minute, annealing at for 1 minute, and extension at for 1 minute. The final cycle allowed an additional 5 minute period of extension at .

Similarly, DAMD-PCR was carried out according to Zhou and Gustafson [24]. This technique involves the use of minisatellite core sequence as a primer, singly, in the amplification reactions. Six minisatellite core sequence primers (custom synthesized from Bangalore Genei, India) were analyzed (Table 2). The reaction mixture (25  l) contained 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH8.3), 50 mM KCl, 2 mM Mg2+ ion concentration, 200  M each dNTP, 20-pmole primer, 1 unit of Taq polymerase (Bangalore Genei, India) and approximately 60 ng genomic DNA. Optimal DNA amplification was obtained through 40 cycles at different temperature and time duration ( for 1 minute, for 2 minutes, and for 2 minutes). The amplification of DNA was performed on a PTC-200 thermocycler (MJ Research, Inc. USA).

Amplified PCR products were separated on 1.5% (w/v) agarose gel in 0.5 Tris-Borate EDTA (TBE) buffer at 100 V for 3 hours, stained with ethidium bromide and then visualized and photographed on a UV Transilluminator using a Gel Documentation System (UV Tech, UK). Amplified products were estimated on the gel by comparison with molecular weight-marker low-range DNA ruler. The reproducibility of the amplification products was checked twice for each polymorphic primer and only reproducible fragments were counted. The representative gels for each marker system have been provided in Figure 2.

2.4. Data Analysis

Data generated by ISSR, RAPD, and DAMD (amplified products estimated on the gel by comparison with molecular weight-marker low-range DNA ruler) were scored “1” to indicate presence and “0” to indicate absence of a band. A pairwise matrix of distances between genotypes was determined for the band data from each method using Jaccard’s similarity coefficient in the Free Tree program [25]. From the pairwise distance data, the UPGMA trees were computed after allowing a 1000-replicate bootstrap test using the same program. The trees were viewed, annotated, and printed using Tree View (version 1.6.5; page 2001) [26]. Group analysis, gene diversity (H) [27], and Shannon information index (I) [28] were calculated using POPGENE program [29]. For this analysis, genotypes were considered in two groups consisting of genotypes of Lahul-Spiti and Leh and Ladakh.

3. Results

3.1. Morphological Diversity

A. rhizanthus ssp. rhizanthus var. rhizanthus exhibits enormous amount of variations especially in the size of plants, length of leaves, shape and size of leaflets, nature of inflorescence, size of bracts, length of calyx and pods, and so forth. Usually, the plants are almost stemless or with very short stem which hardly reaches up to 10 cm in length. The plants growing in very hard or rocky soils become stunted in comparison to the plant growing in moist and sandy soils. They grow singly or in tufts from a thick and woody perennial rootstock which also varies in length depending upon the nature of soils. The leaves considerably vary from 3 to 22 cm in length among different plants even within the same population. The plants with the longest leaves have been encountered in some pockets of Sissu-Gondla region of Lahul-Spiti in Himachal Pradesh; however, at higher altitudes in Ladakh region, the plants are of very dwarf size. Similarly, the leaflets also express great variations in number, shape, and size and density of hairs from plant to plant irrespective to the populations. The number of leaflets in each leaf varies from 29 to 45 depending upon the length of leaf rachis. The size of the leaflets ranges from 3 to 15 mm in length and from 3 to 7 mm in width. The shape also drastically varies within population and it may be orbicular, obovate, elliptic, or lanceolate with different types of apices (rounded, obtuse, acute, or emarginated). The leaflets are usually hairy on both sides but the density of hairs differs among plants chiefly on the upper surface. However, the plants collected from Jammu and Kashmir have been found comparatively more hairy than others. Generally, the inflorescence/flowers are aggregated towards the tip of stem without distinct peduncles; however, occasionally, especially when stems get slightly elongated, the peduncle length reaches up to 10 mm. Bract, which is considered an important taxonomic character in the genus Astragalus, remarkably varies in its length within the taxon. It may be equal or distinctly longer than pedicel. Like bract, calyx is also an another useful character in the whole genus to discriminate the taxa; however, here it distinctly varies. Apart from the variation in the length (12–17 mm), the calyx also varies in the proportion of tube and lobes length. Usually, the tube is longer than lobes; however, sometimes lobes become more or less equal to tube. Variations have also been noticed in flower size (18–23 mm) and shape of standard petal (broadly obovate to oblong-elliptic). Although, the wing petals are usually shorter than standard, in some cases they reach up to the length of standard petal. The styles are glabrous throughout but quite rarely hairs have been observed in the lower portion. Pods also show some variations in length (12–20 mm) and density of hairs (moderately to densely hairy). The above variations are quite irregular and cannot be correlated with any particular population.

3.2. Genetic Diversity

In the present study, three independent methods such as ISSR, RAPD, and DAMD were used on different genotypes of A. rhizanthus ssp. rhizanthus var. rhizanthus. The three methods revealed polymorphism independent of each other from several regions of genome. Therefore, a combined data analysis of all three methods which consists of more numbers of primers and more coverage of genome considered together revealed a comprehensive pattern of genetic diversity amongst the genotypes.

In ISSR, 15 discrete primers were used that resulted in 260 bands, out of which 242 bands were polymorphic revealing 93.07% polymorphism. Number of bands per primer varied from 11 (824) to 23 (830) with 17.3 bands per primer. The size of fragments ranged from 450 bp to 2800 bp. In case of RAPD, 352 bands were polymorphic out of the 381 bands obtained with 18 primers revealing 92.38% polymorphism. The number of bands per primer ranged from 14 (OPN-10) to 26 (OPU-07) with 21.16 bands per primer. The size of the fragments ranged from 250 bp to 3000 bp. Six DAMD primers resulted in 142 polymorphic bands out of total 156 bands revealing 91.02% polymorphism. Size of bands ranges from 200 bp to 3000 bp. The number of bands per primer varied from 22 (HVR) to 32 (HVA) with an average of 23.5 bands per primer. The cumulative band data generated through the above three Single Primer Amplification Reaction (SPAR) methods resulted is 92.34% polymorphism (Table 2) across all genotypes and this level of intraspecific polymorphism suggests that A. rhizanthus ssp. rhizanthus var. rhizanthus was significantly diverse in India.

A cumulative data was used to generate the similarity index for ISSR, RAPD, and DAMD methods based on Jaccard’s similarity coefficient. The similarity values for the combined data varied from 0.19 to 0.84 between pairs of genotypes (Table 3). Cluster analysis was used to generate UPGMA dendrogram after 1000-replicate bootstrap test. All the genotypes of candidate taxon had been grouped into two major clusters (with 99% bootstrap) marked as A and B in Figure 3. The genotypes of Lahul-Spiti region had been clubbed in cluster A, while cluster B contains the genotypes of Leh and Ladakh region of A. rhizanthus ssp. rhizanthus var. rhizanthus. The Oxytropis tatarica Bunge was used as an out-group (Og) in the study which has been clearly separated from A. rhizanthus ssp. rhizanthus var. rhizanthus. In the subcluster A1, all accessions (AR1-AR7) collected from Koksar region clubbed together. The individuals of this group exhibited 80% of similarity. Similarly, all accessions (AR8-AR10) except AR11 collected from Gondla were grouped together in subcluster A2 with 77% similarity. Further subclustering of accessions AR12-17 was neither according to geographical affiliation nor based on any morphological affinities. In subcluster A3, the accessions of two quite different localities and altitudes (AR11 from Gondla, 2905 m and AR12 from Triloki Nath, 3812 m) had been grouped together with 71% similarity. The elements AR13 of Gondla and Sissu and AR14 of Chota Dara with 60% similarity coefficient value had been grouped into subcluster A4. These populations were geographically quite distant from each other and distinctly differ in climatic and edaphic conditions. The accessions AR15 (from between Chatru and Chota Dara) and AR17 (from Gramphu) again were grouped together in subcluster A5 with only 47% similarity. Likewise, the accession AR16 collected from Chota Dara has not clubbed with the other individuals of the same locality and distinctly separated out in the dendrogram. Cluster B includes all the accessions of Astragalus ssp. rhizanthus var. rhizanthus of Leh and Ladakh region (4800 m–5200 m). The UPGMA dendrogram thus depicts apparent correlation between geographical and genetic diversity amongst Lahul-Spiti and Leh and Ladakh genotypes (Figure 3). Estimates of Shannon Index (I) and gene diversity (H) showed that the target genotypes of Leh and Ladakh were more heterogeneous and had higher H and I values (0.2216 and 0.3826,. resp.) compared to the corresponding values (0.2106 and 0.3512,. resp.) in the genotype of Lahul-Spiti (Table 4).



Genotype groupMean (Std. Dev.)Mean (Std. Dev.)

Lahul-Spiti0.2106 (0.1839)0.3512 (0.2532)
Leh and Ladakh0.2216 (0.1938)0.3826 (0.2697)

is Nei's measure of genetic diversity [27].
is Shannon's information index [28].

4. Discussion

In recent years, PCR-based methods like ISSR, RAPD, and DAMD have been extensively used to assess the intraspecific genetic diversity as well as to establish the interspecific relationships in several plant groups like Cicer [30], Astragalus [3136], Phyllanthus [37], and Trigonella [38]. In the present study, 20 genotypes of the A. rhizanthus ssp. rhizanthus var. rhizanthus and one of Oxytropis tatarica as the out-group were considered to assess the genetic diversity by using ISSR, RAPD, and DAMD analyses as no such type of study has been carried out on this species in the past.

The ISSR, RAPD, and DAMD data analysis revealed the genetic similarity coefficients among the genotypes and that varied from 0.19 to 0.84. In all three methods the average percentage of polymorphism has been marked at very high level between 19% and 84% amongst the genotypes. The maximum (84%) and minimum (19%) polymorphism has been observed in the accessions AR1 and AR3 (collected from Koksar) and AR19 and AR20 (collected from Jammu Kashmir), respectively. At the population level, the genotypes collected from Leh and Ladakh were more heterogeneous as estimated by Shannon Index (I) and gene diversity (H) and may be conserved (Table 4). Large number of bands obtained per primer in the present study indicated the efficiency of the selected primers to characterize the genotypes of the candidate species. Amongst all the three methods, viz., ISSR, RAPD, and DAMD, ISSR has shown maximum (93.07%) polymorphism across the different genotypes of A. rhizanthus ssp. rhizanthus var. rhizanthus in comparison to RAPD (92.38%) and DAMD (91.02%). This is indicative of the fact that ISSR is the most suitable method for unraveling the genetic diversity in Astragalus species [28].

The UPGMA tree generated for all the genotypes resulted in a discrete clustering of the genotypes which have been grouped more or less according to their geographical distribution and not in accordance with any morphological characters. Furthermore, the out-group accession of Oxytropis tatarica has clearly been separated out from the genotypes analyzed. The high bootstrap percentages, at the nodes, support the robustness of the clustering of the genotypes and the genetic diversity amongst them. The genotypes from similar geographical regions showed closer genetic similarity than those from the geographically distant regions. All genotypes of the candidate taxon of Lahul-Spiti (Himachal Pradesh) region resulted in a single large cluster marked as A at the node of the tree and the genotypes collected from Leh and Ladakh (Jammu and Kashmir) were clustered together in a separate cluster B. Within cluster A of Lahul-Spiti region again the genotypes collected from Koksar and Gondla regions have clubbed together except one accession of Gondla. The individual accession collected from other localities (AR12–AR16) has been grouped separately, it further indicated that genotypes have more affinity to their local climate /microclimate than any morphological similarities. It appears that different morphological characters have evolved independently respective to their geographical location and climatic factors to adapt in particular climate. This may be due to adaptation of the species in different extreme ecological conditions in the Himalaya which vary from region to region.


The authors are grateful to Dr. Rakesh Tuli, Director of National Botanical Research Institute, Lucknow for facilities and encouragements and to the Department of Biotechnology, government of India, New Delhi for financial support.


  1. D. Podlech, “Taxonomic and phytogeographical problems in Astragalus of old world and South–West Asia,” Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, vol. 89B, pp. 37–43, 1986. View at: Google Scholar
  2. S. H. Zarre and D. Podlech, “Problems in the taxonomy of tragacanthic Astragali,” Sendtnera, vol. 4, pp. 243–250, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  3. A. A. Maassoumi, Astragalus L. in the World, Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands, Tehran, Iran, 1998.
  4. L. B. Chuadhary, K. K. Anand, and R. K. Srivastava, “Taxonomic study of endemic species of Astragalus L. (Fabaceae) of India,” Taiwania, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 216–237, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  5. L. B. Chaudhary and S. K. Srivastava, “Taxonomic and distributional notes on some Astragalus L. (Fabaceae) in India,” Taiwania, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 25–48, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  6. D. Podlech, “Revision von Astragalus L. sect. Caprini DC. (Leguminosae),” Mitteilungen Botanische Staatssam München, vol. 25, pp. 1–294, 1988. View at: Google Scholar
  7. L. B. Chaudhary, T. S. Rana, and K. K. Anand, “Current status of the systematics of Astragalus L. (Fabaceae) with special reference to the Himalayan species in India,” Taiwania, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 338–355, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  8. M. J. Sanderson, “Phylogenetic relationship within North American Astragalus L. (Fabaceae),” Systematic Botany, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 414–430, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  9. A. Liston, “Variation in the chloroplast genes rpoC1 and rpoC2 of the genus Astragalus (Fabaceae): evidence from restriction site mapping of a PCR amplified fragment,” American Journal of Botany, vol. 79, no. 8, pp. 953–961, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  10. M. F. Wojciechowski, M. J. Sanderson, and J.-M. Hu, “Evidence on the monophyly of Astragalus (Fabaceae) and its major subgroups based on nuclear ribosomal DNA ITS and chloroplast DNA trnL intron data,” Systematic Botany, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 409–437, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  11. M. F. Wojciechowski, “Astragalus (Fabaceae): a molecular phylogenetic perspective,” Brittonia, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 382–396, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  12. S. Kazempour Osaloo, A. A. Maassoumi, and N. Murakami, “Molecular systematics of the genus Astragalus L. (Fabaceae): phylogenetic analysis of nuclear ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacers and chloroplast gene ndhF sequences,” Plant Systematics and Evolution, vol. 242, no. 1–4, pp. 1–32, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  13. S. Kazempour Osaloo, A. A. Maassoumi, and N. Murakami, “Molecular systematics of the old world Astragalus (Fabaceae) as inferred from nrDNA ITS sequence data,” Brittonia, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 367–381, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  14. H. Hamada and T. Kakunaga, “Potential Z-DNA forming sequences are highly dispersed in the human genome,” Nature, vol. 298, no. 5872, pp. 396–398, 1982. View at: Google Scholar
  15. D. Tautz and M. Renz, “Simple sequences are ubiquitous repetitive components of eukaryotic genomes,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 4127–4138, 1984. View at: Google Scholar
  16. R. Condit and S. P. Hubbell, “Abundance and DNA sequence of two-base repeat regions in tropical tree genomes,” Genome, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 66–71, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  17. M. Gupta, Y. S. Chyi, J. Romero-Severson, and J. L. Owen, “Amplification of DNA markers from evolutionarily diverse genomes using single primers of simple-sequence repeats,” Theoretical and Applied Genetics, vol. 89, no. 7-8, pp. 998–1006, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  18. Y. Tsumura, K. Ohba, and S. H. Strauss, “Diversity and inheritance of inter-simple sequence repeat polymorphisms in Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) and sugi (Cryptomeria japonica),” Theoretical and Applied Genetics, vol. 92, no. 1, pp. 40–45, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. J. G. K. Williams, A. R. Kubelik, K. J. Livak, J. A. Rafalski, and S. V. Tingey, “DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 18, pp. 6531–6535, 1990. View at: Google Scholar
  20. A. D. Wolfe and A. Liston, “Contributions of PCR based methods to plant systematics and evolutionary biology,” in Molecular Systematics of Plants II: DNA Sequencing, D. E. Soltis, P. S. Soltis, and J. J. Doyle, Eds., pp. 43–86, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, Mass, USA, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  21. J. Harris, “RAPDs in systematics-a useful methodology?” in Molecular Systematics and Plant Evolution, P. M. Hollingsworth, R. M. Bateman, and R. J. Gornall, Eds., pp. 221–228, Taylor & Francis, London, UK, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  22. D. D. Heath, G. K. Iwama, and R. H. Devlin, “PCR primed with VNTR core sequences yields species specific patterns and hypervariable probes,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 21, no. 24, pp. 5782–5785, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  23. M. W. Chase and H. H. Hills, “Silica gel: an ideal material for field preservation of leaf samples for DNA studies,” Taxon, vol. 40, pp. 215–220, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  24. Z. Zhou and J. P. Gustafson, “Genetic variation detected by DNA fingerprinting with a rice minisatellite probe in Oryza sativa L.,” Theoretical and Applied Genetics, vol. 91, no. 3, pp. 481–488, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. A. Pavlicek, S. Hrda, and J. Flegr, “FreeTree-freeware program for construction of phylogenetic trees on the basis of distance data and Bootstrap/Jackknife analysis of the tree robustness. Application in the RAPD analysis of genus Frenkelia,” Folia Biologica, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 97–99, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  26. R. D. M. Page, “Tree view (win 32),” ver. 1.6.5., 2001, View at: Google Scholar
  27. M. Nei, “Genetic distance between popultions,” The American Naturalist, vol. 106, pp. 283–292, 1972. View at: Google Scholar
  28. C. E. Shannon and W. Weaver, The Mathematical Theory of Communication, University of Illinois press, Urbana, Ill, USA, 1949.
  29. F. C. Yeh, R. Yang, and T. Boyle, “POPGENE- a Microsoft Windows based freeware for population genetic analysis,” ver. 1.32 (32 bit), 1997, View at: Google Scholar
  30. V. J. Sant, A. G. Patankar, N. D. Sarode et al., “Potential of DNA markers in detecting divergence and in analysing heterosis in Indian elite chickpea cultivars,” Theoretical and Applied Genetics, vol. 98, no. 8, pp. 1217–1225, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. M.-C. Luo, K.-K. Hwu, and T.-C. Huang, “Taxonomic study of Taiwan Astragalus based on genetic variation,” Taxon, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 35–46, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  32. J. A. Alexander, A. Liston, and S. J. Popovich, “Genetic diversity of the narrow endemic Astragalus oniciformis (Fabaceae),” American Journal of Botany, vol. 91, no. 12, pp. 2004–2012, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  33. H.-J. Na, J.-Y. Um, S.-C. Kim et al., “Molecular discrimination of medicinal Astragali radix by RAPD analysis,” Immunopharmacology and Immunotoxicology, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 265–272, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. M. Mehrnia, S. Zarre, and A. Sokhan-Sanj, “Intra- and inter-specific relationships within the Astragalus microcephalus complex (Fabaceae) using RAPD,” Biochemical Systematics and Ecology, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 149–158, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. L. B. Chaudhary, T. S. Rana, D. Narzary, and S. Verma, “A new species of Astragalus L. (Leguminosae) from India based on morphological and molecular markers,” Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, vol. 154, pp. 27–34, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  36. S. Zarre, Z. Khodaei, Z. Karamali, V. Niknam, and M. Mirmasoumi, “Isoenzyme variation patterns and species concept in Astragalus gossypinus and Astragalus persicus complexes (Fabaceae) in Iran,” Biochemical Systematics and Ecology, vol. 35, no. 11, pp. 757–763, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. N. Jain, A. K. Shasany, V. Sundaresan et al., “Molecular diversity in Phyllanthus amarus assessed through RAPD analysis,” Current Science, vol. 85, no. 10, pp. 1454–1458, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  38. R. S. Dangi, M. D. Lagu, L. B. Choudhary, P. K. Ranjekar, and V. S. Gupta, “Assessment of genetic diversity in Trigonella foenum-graecum and Trigonella caerulea using ISSR and RAPD markers,” BMC Plant Biology, vol. 4, article 13, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2010 Kumar Kamal Anand et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2021, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.