Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Combustion
Volume 2015, Article ID 257145, 24 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/257145
Research Article

Conditional Moment Closure Modelling of a Lifted H2/N2 Turbulent Jet Flame Using the Presumed Mapping Function Approach

1Department of Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, ON, Canada N2L 3G1
2Institut de Combustion Aérothermique Réactivité et Environnement (CNRS), 1C avenue de la Recherche Scientifique, 45071 Orléans Cedex 2, France

Received 19 February 2015; Revised 22 April 2015; Accepted 5 May 2015

Academic Editor: Hong G. Im

Copyright © 2015 Ahmad El Sayed and Roydon A. Fraser. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. A. El Sayed and R. A. Fraser, “Consistent Conditional Moment Closure Modelling of a lifted turbulent jet flame using the presumed β-PDF approach,” Journal of Combustion, vol. 2014, Article ID 507459, 25 pages, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. R. Cabra, T. Myhrvold, J. Y. Chen, R. W. Dibble, A. N. Karpetis, and R. S. Barlow, “Simultaneous laser Raman-Rayleigh-lif measurements and numerical modeling results of a lifted turbulent H2/N2 jet flame in a vitiated coflow,” Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 1881–1888, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. S. B. Pope, “The probability approach to the modelling of turbulent reacting flows,” Combustion and Flame, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 299–312, 1976. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. M. J. Cleary, CMC modelling of enclosure fires [Ph.D. thesis], University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia, 2004.
  5. M. Mortensen and B. Andersson, “Presumed mapping functions for eulerian modelling of turbulent mixing,” Flow, Turbulence and Combustion, vol. 76, no. 2, pp. 199–219, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  6. M. Mortensen and S. M. de Bruyn Kops, “Conditional velocity statistics in the double scalar mixing layer—a mapping closure approach,” Combustion Theory and Modelling, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 929–941, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  7. S. S. Girimaji, “On the modeling of scalar diffusion in isotropic turbulence,” Physics of Fluids A, vol. 4, no. 11, pp. 2529–2537, 1992. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. M. Mortensen, “Consistent modeling of scalar mixing for presumed, multiple parameter probability density functions,” Physics of Fluids, vol. 17, no. 1, Article ID 018106, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. I. Stanković and B. Merci, “LES-CMC simulations of a turbulent lifted hydrogen flame in vitiated co-flow,” Thermal Science, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 763–772, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. S. S. Patwardhan, K. N. Lakshmisha, and B. N. Raghunandan, “CMC simulations of lifted turbulent jet flame in a vitiated coflow,” Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 1705–1712, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. S. Navarro-Martinez and A. Kronenburg, “Flame stabilization mechanisms in lifted flames,” Flow, Turbulence and Combustion, vol. 87, no. 2-3, pp. 377–406, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  12. H. Chen, S. Chen, and R. H. Kraichnan, “Probability distribution of a stochastically advected scalar field,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 63, no. 24, pp. 2657–2660, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. E. E. O'Brien and T.-L. Jiang, “The conditional dissipation rate of an initially binary scalar in homogeneous turbulence,” Physics of Fluids A, vol. 3, no. 12, pp. 3121–3123, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  14. I. S. Kim, E. Mastorakos, and B. Merci, “Simulations of turbulent lifted jet flames with two-dimensional conditional moment closure,” Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 911–918, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. A. El Sayed, A. Milford, and C. B. Devaud, “Modelling of autoignition for methane-based fuel blends using conditional moment closure,” Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 1621–1628, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. N. Peters, “Laminar diffusion flamelet models in non-premixed turbulent combustion,” Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 319–339, 1984. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. A. Y. Klimenko and S. B. Pope, “The modeling of turbulent reactive flows based on multiple mapping conditioning,” Physics of Fluids, vol. 15, no. 7, pp. 1907–1925, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  18. S. B. Pope, “PDF methods for turbulent reactive flows,” Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 119–192, 1985. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. M. J. Cleary and A. Kronenburg, “‘Hybrid’ multiple mapping conditioning on passive and reactive scalars,” Combustion and Flame, vol. 151, no. 4, pp. 623–638, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. S. M. de Bruyn Kops and M. Mortensen, “Conditional mixing statistics in a self-similar scalar mixing layer,” Physics of Fluids, vol. 17, no. 9, Article ID 095107, 11 pages, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  21. C. M. Cha, S. M. de Bruyn Kops, and M. Mortensen, “Direct numerical simulations of the double scalar mixing layer. Part I: passive scalar mixing and dissipation,” Physics of Fluids, vol. 18, no. 6, Article ID 067106, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. M. Mortensen, S. M. de Bruyn Kops, and C. M. Cha, “Direct numerical simulations of the double scalar mixing layer. Part II: reactive scalars,” Combustion and Flame, vol. 149, no. 4, pp. 392–408, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. A. El Sayed, M. Mortensen, and J. Z. Wen, “Assessment of the presumed mapping function approach for the stationary laminar flamelet modelling of reacting double scalar mixing layers,” Combustion Theory and Modelling, vol. 18, no. 4-5, pp. 552–581, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  24. E. A. Brizuela and M. Z. Roudsari, “Comparison of RANS/CMC modeling of flame D with conventional and with presumed mapping function statistics,” Combustion Theory and Modelling, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 671–690, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  25. R. S. Barlow and J. H. Frank, “Effects of turbulence on species mass fractions in methane/air jet flames,” Symposium (International) on Combustion, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 1087–1095, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. A. R. Masri, R. Cao, S. B. Pope, and G. M. Goldin, “PDF calculations of turbulent lifted flames of H2/N2 fuel issuing into a vitiated co-flow,” Combustion Theory and Modelling, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–22, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. R. R. Cao, S. B. Pope, and A. R. Masri, “Turbulent lifted flames in a vitiated coflow investigated using joint PDF calculations,” Combustion and Flame, vol. 142, no. 4, pp. 438–453, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. R. L. Gordon, A. R. Masri, S. B. Pope, and G. M. Goldin, “A numerical study of auto-ignition in turbulent lifted flames issuing into a vitiated co-flow,” Combustion Theory and Modelling, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 351–376, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  29. T. Myhrvold, I. S. Ertesvåg, I. R. Gran, R. Cabra, and J.-Y. Chen, “A numerical investigation of a lifted H2/N2 turbulent jet flame in a vitiated coflow,” Combustion Science and Technology, vol. 178, no. 6, pp. 1001–1030, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. A. Y. Klimenko and R. W. Bilger, “Conditional moment closure for turbulent combustion,” Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 595–687, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. C. K. Madnia, S. H. Frankel, and P. Givi, “Reactant conversion in homogeneous turbulence: mathematical modeling, computational validations, and practical applications,” Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 79–93, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. N. Swaminathan and R. W. Bilger, “Analyses of conditional moment closure for turbulent premixed flames,” Combustion Theory and Modelling, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 241–260, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  33. N. Swaminathan and R. W. Bilger, “Scalar dissipation, diffusion and dilatation in turbulent H2-air premixed flames with complex chemistry,” Combustion Theory and Modelling, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 429–446, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. W. P. Jones and J. H. Whitelaw, “Calculation methods for reacting turbulent flows: a review,” Combustion and Flame, vol. 48, pp. 1–26, 1982. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. E. S. Richardson and E. Mastorakos, “Simulations of non-premixed edge-flame propagation in turbulent non-premixed jets,” in Proceedings of the 3rd European Combustion Meeting (ECM '07), Chania, Greece, April 2007.
  36. R. S. Barlow, A. N. Karpetis, J. H. Frank, and J.-Y. Chen, “Scalar profiles and NO formation in laminar opposed-flow partially premixed methane/air flames,” Combustion and Flame, vol. 127, no. 3, pp. 2102–2118, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. C. Y. Ma, T. Mahmud, M. Fairweather, E. Hampartsoumian, and P. H. Gaskell, “Prediction of lifted, non-premixed turbulent flames using a mixedness-reactedness flamelet model with radiation heat loss,” Combustion and Flame, vol. 128, no. 1-2, pp. 60–73, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. M. Mortensen, “Implementation of a conditional moment closure for mixing sensitive reactions,” Chemical Engineering Science, vol. 59, no. 24, pp. 5709–5723, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. S. B. Pope, “An explanation of the turbulent round-jet/plane-jet anomaly,” AIAA Journal, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 279–281, 1978. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  40. W. P. Jones and P. Musonge, “Closure of the Reynolds stress and scalar flux equations,” The Physics of Fluids, vol. 31, no. 12, pp. 3589–3604, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  41. B. Koren, “A robust upwind discretization method for advection, diffusion and source terms,” in Numerical Methods for Advection-Diffusion Problems, C. B. Vreugdenhil and B. Koren, Eds., vol. 45 of Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics, pp. 117–138, Vieweg, Braunschweig, Germany, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  42. G. D. Byrne, “Pragmatic experiments with Krylov methods in the stiff ODE setting,” in Computational Ordinary Differential Equations, J. Cash and I. Gladwell, Eds., pp. 323–356, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 1992. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  43. G. Strang, “On the construction and comparison of difference schemes,” SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 506–517, 1968. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  44. M. A. Mueller, T. J. Kim, R. A. Yetter, and F. L. Dryer, “Flow reactor studies and kinetic modeling of the H2/O2 reaction,” International Journal of Chemical Kinetics, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 113–125, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. M. Mortensen, PMFpack, https://github.com/mikaem/PMFpack.
  46. N. Swaminathan and R. W. Bilger, “Assessment of combustion submodels for turbulent nonpremixed hydrocarbon flames,” Combustion and Flame, vol. 116, no. 4, pp. 519–545, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. N. Peters and F. A. Williams, “Lift-off characteristics of turbulent jet diffusion flames,” AIAA Journal, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 423–429, 1983. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. S. Ruan, N. Swaminathan, and O. Darbyshire, “Modelling of turbulent lifted jet flames using flamelets: a priori assessment and {\it a posteriori} validation,” Combustion Theory and Modelling, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 295–329, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  49. Z. Chen, S. Ruan, and N. Swaminathan, “Simulation of turbulent lifted methane jet flames: effects of air-dilution and transient flame propagation,” Combustion and Flame, vol. 162, no. 3, pp. 703–716, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  50. R. L. Gordon, A. R. Masri, S. B. Pope, and G. M. Goldin, “Transport budgets in turbulent lifted flames of methane autoigniting in a vitiated co-flow,” Combustion and Flame, vol. 151, no. 3, pp. 495–511, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. L. Vanquickenborne and A. van Tiggelen, “The stabilization mechanism of lifted diffusion flames,” Combustion and Flame, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 59–69, 1966. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. K. Tsai and R. O. Fox, “Modeling multiple reactive scalar mixing with the generalized IEM model,” Physics of Fluids, vol. 7, no. 11, pp. 2820–2830, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus