Journal of Cancer Epidemiology

Journal of Cancer Epidemiology / 2013 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2013 |Article ID 467927 |

Ali Khawaja, Santosh Rao, Li Li, Cheryl L. Thompson, "Sleep Duration and Breast Cancer Phenotype", Journal of Cancer Epidemiology, vol. 2013, Article ID 467927, 7 pages, 2013.

Sleep Duration and Breast Cancer Phenotype

Academic Editor: Nicoletta Sacchi
Received13 Jun 2013
Accepted17 Sep 2013
Published04 Nov 2013


Emerging evidence suggests that short sleep is associated with an increased risk of cancer; however, little has been done to study the role of sleep on tumor characteristics. In this study, we evaluated the relationship between sleep duration and tumor phenotype in 972 breast cancer patients. Sleep duration was inversely associated with tumor grade (univariate ), particularly in postmenopausal women (univariate ). This association did not reach statistical significance after adjustments for age, race, body mass index, hormone replacement therapy use, alcohol consumption, smoking, and physical activity in the entire study sample ( ), but it remained statistically significant ( ) among post-menopausal patients. We did not observe a statistically significant association between sleep duration and stage at diagnosis, ER, or HER2 receptor status. These results present a modest association between short duration of sleep and higher grade breast cancer in post-menopausal women. Further work needs to be done to validate these findings.

1. Introduction

Breast cancer is the leading cancer in women in the United States and the third leading cause of cancer deaths among women [1]. It was estimated that over 220,000 women will be diagnosed in 2012 with breast cancer, with almost 40,000 women deaths [2]. Women diagnosed with localized breast cancer have a very favorable outcome, with a 99% 5-year survival. However, the survival rate decreases to 84% with regional disease and 23% for women with distant metastases, underscoring the importance of identifying factors associated with the development of more aggressive breast cancers.

There is an emerging evidence for the role of sleep deprivation in carcinogenesis, with new research suggesting that disruptions in the circadian rhythm may increase the risk of several types of cancer [35], including breast cancer (reviewed in [6]). In the few studies of sleep duration and risk of breast cancer, the association of short sleep duration and the incidence of breast cancer has been mixed, with one study suggesting a decreased risk of breast cancer in women who slept longer [7], two other studies showing an inverse association between sleep duration and risk of breast cancer [8, 9], and a fourth study that did not find evidence of this association [10].

However, much less work has been done to investigate whether short sleep duration prior to the diagnosis is associated with breast cancer phenotype. Markers of more aggressive and advanced breast cancer include stage, determined by the size of the tumor and lymph node status or distant metastases, tumor grade, hormone receptor status, and HER2 expression status. Patients with HER2 positive and/or estrogen receptor (ER) negative breast cancer carry a poorer prognosis with a higher risk of recurrence [11]. For patients with hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer (stage I or II), Oncotype DX, a gene-expression-based marker of increased likelihood of cancer recurrence, has been used to help guide the clinical decisions regarding the benefit of chemotherapy [12]. Oncotype DX recurrence scores correlate with higher tumor grade and lower estrogen receptor expression [13, 14]. We recently reported the association of short sleep duration with higher Oncotype DX recurrence scores among post-menopausal breast cancer patients [15].

The aim of this study was to further explore the relationship between sleep deprivation and markers of cancer aggressiveness in breast cancer patients. We examined the association of sleep duration with the stage and grade of tumor as well as tumor markers (ER and HER2 expression). We further stratify by menopausal status, as we hypothesize that the sleep duration would have a disproportionate effect on post-menopausal breast cancer patients, in light of our earlier findings [15].

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Patient Population

The longitudinal changes in mammographic density and risk of breast cancer study is an ongoing breast cancer case-control study of women with multiple screening mammograms. Women with newly diagnosed breast cancer (including DCIS) at the University Hospitals Case Medical Center (UHCMC), as well as controls recruited at the time of screening mammography, were approached for recruitment for study participation from January 2007 through July 2012. Exclusion criteria included prior nonsurgical treatment for any cancer, other concurrent cancers, or known presence of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. Patients must speak English to be eligible for participation. Only the breast cancer patients were included in this study. All participants completed a phone survey based on a validated questionnaire developed and used by the researchers at the University of Southern California for breast cancer research [16]. Participants also donated a blood sample for genetic and biomarker studies and consented to link their study data to their medical records. All patients provided informed consent linking their responses to their medical record data, and the study was approved by the UHCMC institutional review board.

2.2. Data Collection

Patients enrolled in the study were asked by phone survey about their average length of sleep at night for the 2 years prior to the diagnosis as well as additional lifestyle and demographic factors. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated from self-reported height and weight prior to diagnosis. Physical activity was coded as the sum of the self-reported average weekly hours of strenuous and moderately strenuous physical activity. Smoking was defined as current smoker versus noncurrent smoker, which includes both never smokers and past smokers. Alcohol consumption was based on questions about the average weekly number of drinks of beer or ciders, wine and hard liquor, or mixed drinks in the two years prior to diagnosis. Current drinkers were coded as those individuals reporting drinking at least one drink per week. Menopausal status was defined as post-menopausal for women self-reporting having no menstrual periods within the previous 6 months, including women who have not had a menstrual period due to surgery, and premenopausal for those reporting a recent menstrual period. Race was self-reported as Caucasian, African-American, Hispanic, Asian, or Other. Due to small numbers, Hispanic and Asian participants were coded as “Other.” Current use of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) was defined as self-reported use of estrogen and/or progesterone replacement therapy for one month or longer any time during the two years prior to diagnosis (cases) or two years prior to recruitment (controls).

Medical records were obtained and reviewed for tumor stage at diagnosis, modified Bloom-Richardson grade, and hormone receptor and HER2 status (when available). When there were concurrent tumors present, the most advanced one was coded.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

Sleep was treated as a continuous variable and categorized into less than 6 hours per night, at least 6 but less than 7 hours per night, and at least 7 hours per night, as we previously found it to be associated with Oncotype DX score (15). The statistical significance of differences in demographic and clinical characteristics among the women in the three sleep categories was done using a chi-square test (for categorical variables), or a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) (for continuous variables). Mean hours of sleep per night was calculated for each tumor characteristic, and the statistical significance of differences in means was calculated using ANOVA. In order to assess the univariate trend of increasing stage and grade with hours of sleep, we used an ordinal logistic regression with sleep duration as a continuous variable.

Average sleep duration is known to vary with age, obesity, and other lifestyle variables. In order to adjust for these potential confounders, we tested the association of self-reported average hours of sleep per night with grade, stage, ER status, and HER2 status using logistic regression models (ordinal logistic regression for grade and stage). In each regression model, we adjusted for age, race, HRT, BMI, current smoking, current alcohol consumption, and physical activity, as all these factors are known to be associated with sleep duration.

In light of our earlier findings that the association of Oncotype DX score and sleep duration was limited to post-menopausal patients, and the known difference in etiologies of pre- and post-menopausal breast cancer, we then repeated all statistical analyses stratified by menopausal status. All statistics were performed using SAS v.9.2, using values < 0.05 for significance.

3. Results

From a total of 1,097 breast cancer patients participating in the study, we were unable to locate medical records for 118 patients. Two patients were excluded from this analysis due to diagnoses of Paget’s disease or Phyllodes tumor. Five additional patients with missing sleep duration data were excluded. The remaining 972 patients were included in the study.

Table 1 shows the characteristics of the study population overall and by category of sleep duration. There was a significant difference in sleep duration by race, as African American women reported less sleep than Caucasian women ( ). As expected, women who reported fewer hours of sleep had higher BMI ( ). We also noted that short sleepers were less likely to be current alcohol drinkers ( ). No clear trend was observed for menopausal status, stage, grade, estrogen receptor status, or HER2 status with sleep duration category.

All ( )Less than 6 hours of sleep/night ( )6 to less than 7 hours of sleep/night ( )7 or more hours of sleep per night ( )

Age, mean (SD)58.0 (11.4)57.8 (11.0)57.3 (11.1)58.4 (11.6)0.44
Postmenopausal, (%)0.87
 Yes817 (84.1%)88 (10.8%)190 (23.3%)539 (66.0%)
 No155 (16.0%)17 (11.0%)33 (21.3%)105 (67.7%)
Race, (%)<0.0001
 Caucasian831 (85.5%)74 (70.5%)183 (82.1%)574 (89.1%)
 African American126 (13.0%)28 (26.7%)37 (16.6%)61 (9.5%)
 Other15 (1.5%)3 (2.9%)3 (1.4%)9 (1.4%)
Body mass index, kg/m2, mean (SD)28.1 (6.5)29.4 (7.1)28.7 (7.3)27.7 (6.1)0.015
Physical activity per week, hours, mean (SD)4.0 (4.1)3.6 (4.6)4.1 (4.3)4.0 (3.9)0.55
Current alcohol use, (%)<0.0001
 Yes473 (48.7%)30 (71.4%)91 (40.8%)352 (54.7%)
 No499 (51.3%)75 (28.6%)132 (59.2%)292 (45.3%)
Current HRT user, (%)0.63
 Yes143 (14.7%)16 (15.2%)37 (16.6%)90 (14.0%)
 No829 (85.3%)89 (84.8%)186 (83.4%)554 (86.0%)
Stage, (%)0.30
 0 (DCIS)199 (20.5%)24 (22.9%)46 (20.6%)129 (20.0%)
 1395 (40.6%)37 (35.2%)79 (35.4%)279 (43.3%)
 2278 (28.6%)31 (29.5%)68 (30.5%)179 (27.8%)
 362 (6.4%)8 (7.6%)21 (9.4%)33 (5.1%)
 421 (2.2%)3 (2.9%)5 (2.2%)13 (2.0%)
 Missing17 (1.7%)2 (1.9%)4 (1.8%)11 (1.7%)
Grade, (%)0.40
 1145 (14.9%)10 (9.5%)30 (13.5%)105 (16.3%)
 2309 (31.8%)35 (33.3%)68 (30.4%)206 (32.0%)
 3209 (21.5%)23 (21.9%)53 (23.8%)133 (20.7%)
 Missing309 (31.8%)37 (35.2%)72 (32.3%)200 (31.1%)
ER status0.0064
 Positive734 (75.5%)83 (79.0%)155 (69.5%)496 (77.0%)
 Negative173 (17.8%)15 (14.3%)56 (25.1%)105 (16.3%)
 Unknown/not done/missing65 (6.7%)7 (6.7%)12 (5.4%)46 (7.1%)
HER2 status0.38
 Positive135 (13.9%)17 (16.2%)34 (15.2%)84 (13.0%)
 Negative599 (61.6%)57 (54.3%)135 (60.5%)407 (63.2%)
 Unknown/not done/missing238 (24.5%)31 (29.5%)54 (24.2%)153 (23.8%)

value of ANOVA (for continuous variables) or chi-square (for categorical variables) test; HRT: hormone replacement therapy.

Table 2 compares the differences in mean self-reported average hours of sleep per night with different measures of an aggressive breast cancer phenotype. In univariate analyses, a significant inverse relationship was found between sleep category duration and grade, with women with higher grade tumors reporting less sleep prior to diagnosis ( , Table 2), as well as sleep as a continuous variable and tumor grade ( ). This association was found in post-menopausal women (sleep categories , sleep hours as continuous ), but no trend was observed in pre-menopausal women (sleep categories , sleep hours as continuous ). There was no univariate correlation between hours of sleep per night and stage ( ). Although, as hypothesized, women with positive HER2 status reported fewer hours of sleep on average, it was not statistically significant (ANOVA ).

All patientsPremenopausalPostmenopausal
Hours of sleep per night, mean (SD) Hours of sleep per night, mean (SD) Hours of sleep per night, mean (SD)

All7.03 (1.20)N/AN/A7.08 (1.24)N/AN/A7.02 (1.20)N/AN/A
 0 (DCIS)6.98 (1.20)7.11 (0.85)6.95 (1.28)
 17.14 (1.20)7.07 (1.42)7.15 (1.16)
 26.99 (1.16)7.23 (1.28)6.94 (1.13)
 36.65 (1.14)6.42 (1.17)6.67 (1.14)
 47.12 (1.68)6.00 (1.41)7.24 (1.69)
 17.23 (1.20)7.63 (1.34)7.16 (1.17)
 27.05 (1.24)6.75 (1.27)7.11 (1.23)
 36.89 (1.18)7.27 (1.38)6.82 (1.13)
ER status0.310.710.380.880.470.69
 Positive7.04 (1.21)7.10 (1.30)7.03 (1.19)
 Negative6.94 (1.19)6.88 (0.98)6.95 (1.23)
HER2 status0.170.230.790.640.170.31
 Positive6.91 (1.10)7.00 (0.89)6.89 (1.13)
 Negative7.06 (1.21)7.09 (1.43)7.06 (1.18)

value of ANOVA (univariate); value of sleep duration in ordinal or standard logistic regression adjusted for age, race, hormone replacement therapy (HRT), family history of breast cancer, body mass index (BMI), current smoking, current alcohol consumption, and physical activity.

In multivariate analyses adjusting for age, race, BMI, physical activity, current HRT use, tobacco, and alcohol use, average hours of sleep per night no longer remained statistically significantly associated with grade ( ). However, the statistical significance of this association among post-menopausal breast cancer patients remained ( ). As expected, after adjustment, no association among premenopausal breast cancer patients was observed ( ).

4. Discussion

According to the National Sleep Foundation (NSF), a healthy adult should sleep 7–9 hours/day [17]. A survey conducted by the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) revealed that about 30% of employed US civilian adults report an average sleep duration of ≤6 hours a day, which highlights lack of sufficient sleep as a public health problem [18]. Previous studies suggest that sleep deprivation is a risk factor for the development of breast cancer [8, 9]. We recently showed that short sleep duration correlates with higher Oncotype DX recurrence scores in post-menopausal breast cancer patients [15]. In this study, we show a modest association between short sleep duration and higher grade of breast cancer, which is limited to post-menopausal women.

Multiple studies have reported an association between short sleep duration and the risk of developing cancer. The biologic basis for this association has yet to be determined. The metabolic syndrome describes the clustering of hypertension, dyslipidemia, obesity, and insulin-resistance [19]. Sleep deprivation is linked with obesity and the metabolic syndrome [20, 21], both of which contribute to breast cancer incidence and stage at presentation, although our multivariate analysis accounted for BMI differences. Turek et al. reported in their animal trial that mice homozygous for a mutant Clock gene, a gene that influences both the persistence and periods of circadian rhythms, tend to have a higher food intake, were obese and more prone to develop metabolic syndrome with high levels of leptin, lipids, glucose and reduced compensatory insulin production [22]. Insulin resistance has been shown to be a risk factor for the incidence of breast cancer, again primarily in post-menopausal women, and negatively impacts prognosis [23, 24]. Although insulin resistance is correlated with BMI, we did not specifically adjust for independent effects of insulin resistance. Sleep deprivation also has a proinflammatory and immuno-modulatory effect, which may contribute to the development of more aggressive cancers [25].

It has been observed that genes regulating the sleep cycle are deregulated in cancers [26]. Two sleep-related genes, PERIOD1 and PERIOD3, which are key regulators of our circadian rhythm, have been found to affect the apoptosis in cancer cell lines [27]. A recent study, which used a combination of human breast tumor analysis and mouse models, further showed that a deletion/reduced expression of PERIOD3 gene on chromosome 1p36 was related to the recurrence of the tumor in ER + breast cancer patients, further highlighting the role of the circadian rhythm in tumor aggressiveness [28].

Another possible explanation may be found in the role of melatonin in the regulation of the circadian rhythm and its potential effects on the breast cancer. Melatonin depletion has been seen in breast cancer patients, with low nighttime peaks [29], rather than low daily levels [30], correlating with advanced stage at presentation. Antineoplastic properties of melatonin in preclinical models include antioxidant, proapoptotic, antiinflammatory, antiangiogenic, immunostimulatory effects, and alterations in metabolism and gene regulation [31]. It is now well known that the constant exposure to light at night promotes tumorigenesis by inhibiting nocturnal release of melatonin by the pineal gland. It was initially highlighted in an experimental model where either the surgical removal of pineal gland or constant light promoted mammary tumorigenesis in rodents [32]. These findings were further strengthened by the work of Blask et al. [33]. In this study, blood samples were taken from healthy, premenopausal women either in daytime, nighttime, or nighttime after the exposure to bright, white fluorescent light. These blood samples were then perfused in the human breast cancer xenografts in nude rats. It was noted that the nighttime samples with physiological melatonin-rich levels significantly suppressed the tumor proliferative activity and linoleic acid metabolism. However, the melatonin deficient samples following ocular light exposure simulated the increased tumor proliferative activity of the daytime samples. Moreover, this relationship was found to be intensity dependent [33]. In addition, using a tissue isolated human breast xenograft tumor nude rat model, Mao et al. highlighted the link between melatonin and glycogen synthase kinase 3β (GSK3β), an enzyme that plays a vital role in metabolism and cell proliferation. Melatonin is responsible for activating GSK3β, which in turn inhibits epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, a critical process in underlying cancer spread and metastasis. The exposure to light at night was found to suppress the nocturnal pineal gland melatonin synthesis leading to the inhibition of circadian phosphorylation of GSK3β and hence increasing the susceptibility to breast cancer spread [34]. Furthermore, melatonin has multiple antiestrogenic effects, acting to decrease ovarian estrogen production, reducing aromatase activity, and decreasing ER-α expression and estrogen mediated transcription of proliferative genes [35].

Due predominantly to the large number of DCIS (stage 0) patients in our sample, for which HER2 is not routinely tested, HER2 status was not available for a large proportion of our study population (24.5%). In our sample, patients with HER2 positive breast cancer reported less average nightly sleep. Although this association was not statistically significant, we feel it is worth following up in a larger sample population. There was no clear association between sleep duration and the development of metastatic breast cancer, as premenopausal patients with stage IV disease slept less, whereas post-menopausal patients with stage IV disease slept more, although our sample size in this group was very small.

There are additional limitations in our study. First, the self-reported duration of sleep is subject to recall bias and does not measure other parameters of sleep, including quality and sleep patterns, which may also be important risk factors for breast cancer aggressiveness, but we are unable to study in this sample. However, given that we recruited patients at diagnosis, we feel that this recall bias would be minimal. In addition, we only queried on sleep duration for the two years prior to diagnosis. We cannot address possible effects of sleep earlier in life or the longer term effects of short sleep duration. Secondly, although our study population reflects the racial distribution of the patients seen at this hospital, a majority of our study population is Caucasian. Further work will need to be done in other populations with more minorities to assess generalizability of our findings. A large study population added to the strength of the study; however, the small number of premenopausal patients limits our ability to make conclusions in that subset of patients. However, the observed effect of the association of sleep with grade in the premenopausal population is much smaller than that in the post-menopausal group. Therefore, while we cannot rule out an effect of sleep duration with grade in premenopausal women, our data suggests that if such an effect exists, it is likely to be a smaller effect than in post-menopausal breast cancer patients.

To the best of our knowledge, this is only the second study to investigate the association between sleep duration and breast cancer phenotype, the first being our study on sleep duration and Oncotype DX score. Approximately 1 in 8 US women will develop breast cancer in their lifetime. With the additional mortality and costs associated with treating more aggressive breast cancers, it is important to understand that risk factors that affect breast cancer severity. Given that 30% of adults sleep less than 6 hours per night [18], the association of short sleep duration with breast cancer incidence and phenotype suggests that the attributable population risk due to short sleep duration is high. Further studies are required to validate these findings, as well as to identify the biological reasons for this observed association.

Ethical Approval

All experiments conducted as part of this study comply with laws within the United States.

Conflict of Interests

The authors disclose no potential conflict of interests.

Authors’ Contribution

Ali Khawaja: acquisition of data and paper writing, Santosh Rao: acquisition of data and manuscript writing, Li Li: critical revision of the manuscript, Cheryl L. Thompson: conception and design, acquisition and analysis and interpretation of the data, review and critical revision of the manuscript, and study supervision.


This study was supported by the National Cancer Institute (Grant nos. K07 CA136758 to CLT and R03 CA143947 to LL) and the Case Comprehensive Cancer Center (P30 CA043703).


  1. American Cancer Society: Breast Cancer Facts and Figures 2011-2012,
  2. R. Siegel, D. Naishadham, and A. Jemal, “Cancer statistics, 2012,” CA Cancer Journal for Clinicians, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 10–29, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. S. Davis and D. K. Mirick, “Circadian disruption, shift work and the risk of cancer: a summary of the evidence and studies in Seattle,” Cancer Causes and Control, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 539–545, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. C. L. Thompson, E. K. Larkin, S. Patel, N. A. Berger, S. Redline, and L. Li, “Short duration of sleep increases risk of colorectal adenoma,” Cancer, vol. 117, no. 4, pp. 841–847, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. A. N. Viswanathan, S. E. Hankinson, and E. S. Schernhammer, “Night shift work and the risk of endometrial cancer,” Cancer Research, vol. 67, no. 21, pp. 10618–10622, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. L. Fu and C. C. Lee, “The circadian clock: pacemaker and tumour suppressor,” Nature Reviews Cancer, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 350–361, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. P. K. Verkasalo, K. Lillberg, R. G. Stevens et al., “Sleep duration and breast cancer: a prospective cohort study,” Cancer Research, vol. 65, no. 20, pp. 9595–9600, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. M. Kakizaki, S. Kuriyama, T. Sone et al., “Sleep duration and the risk of breast cancer: the Ohsaki Cohort Study,” British Journal of Cancer, vol. 99, no. 9, pp. 1502–1505, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. A. H. Wu, F. Z. Stanczyk, R. Wang et al., “Sleep duration, melatonin and breast cancer among Chinese women in Singapore,” Carcinogenesis, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 1244–1248, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. S. P. Pinheiro, E. S. Schernhammer, S. S. Tworoger, and K. B. Michels, “A prospective study on habitual duration of sleep and incidence of breast cancer in a large cohort of women,” Cancer Research, vol. 66, no. 10, pp. 5521–5525, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. I. L. Andrulis, S. B. Bull, M. E. Blackstein et al., “neu/erbB-2 amplification identifies a poor-prognosis group of women with node-negative breast cancer. Toronto Breast Cancer Study Group,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 1340–1349, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  12. G. Tang, S. Shak, S. Paik et al., “Comparison of the prognostic and predictive utilities of the 21-gene recurrence score assay and adjuvant! for women with node-negative, ER-positive breast cancer: results from NSABP B-14 and NSABP B-20,” Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, vol. 127, no. 1, pp. 133–142, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. J. Asad, A. F. Jacobson, A. Estabrook et al., “Does oncotype DX recurrence score affect the management of patients with early-stage breast cancer?” American Journal of Surgery, vol. 196, no. 4, pp. 527–529, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. R. Gerson Cwilich, L. F. Alban de la Torre, A. Villalobos Prieto, and J. A. Serrano Olvera, “Clinicopathological features, prognosis and influence in the adjuvant treatment of the risk recurrence groups determined by the 21 gene expression profile, Oncotype Dx, in early breast cancer,” Gaceta Médica de México, vol. 148, no. 2, pp. 117–124, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  15. C. L. Thompson and L. Li, “Association of sleep duration and breast cancer OncotypeDX recurrence score,” Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, vol. 134, no. 3, pp. 1291–1295, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. L. Bernstein, M. Allen, H. Anton-Culver et al., “High breast cancer incidence rates among California teachers: results from the California Teachers Study (United States),” Cancer Causes and Control, vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 625–635, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. National Sleep Foundation,
  18. S. E. Luckhaupt, S. Tak, and G. M. Calvert, “The prevalence of short sleep duration by industry and occupation in the National Health Interview Survey,” Sleep, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 149–159, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  19. A. Mitrakou, “Women's health and the metabolic syndrome,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1092, pp. 33–48, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. N. L. Nock, L. Li, E. K. Larkin, S. R. Patel, and S. Redline, “Empirical evidence for “syndrome Z”: a hierarchical 5-factor model of the metabolic syndrome incorporating sleep disturbance measures,” Sleep, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 615–622, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  21. F. P. Cappuccio, F. M. Taggart, N. B. Kandala et al., “Meta-analysis of short sleep duration and obesity in children and adults,” Sleep, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 619–626, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  22. F. W. Turek, C. Joshu, A. Kohsaka et al., “Obesity and metabolic syndrome in circadian Clock mutant nice,” Science, vol. 308, no. 5724, pp. 1043–1045, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. F. Xue and K. B. Michels, “Diabetes, metabolic syndrome, and breast cancer: a review of the current evidence,” The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 86, no. 3, pp. 823S–835S, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  24. A. DeCensi and A. Gennari, “Insulin breast cancer connection: confirmatory data set the stage for better care,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 7–10, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. H. K. Meier-Ewert, P. M. Ridker, N. Rifai et al., “Effect of sleep loss on C-reactive protein, an inflammatory marker of cardiovascular risk,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 678–683, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. C. M. Hsu, S. F. Lin, C. T. Lu, P. M. Lin, and M. Y. Yang, “Altered expression of circadian clock genes in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma,” Tumor Biology, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 149–155, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. F. Sato, Y. Wu, U. K. Bhawal et al., “PERIOD1 (PER1) has anti-apoptotic effects, and PER3 has pro-apoptotic effects during cisplatin (CDDP) treatment in human gingival cancer CA9-22 cells,” European Journal of Cancer, vol. 47, no. 11, pp. 1747–1758, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. J. Climent, J. Perez-Losada, D. A. Quigley et al., “Deletion of the PER3 gene on chromosome 1p36 in recurrent ER-positive breast cancer,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 28, no. 23, pp. 3770–3778, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. C. Bartsch, H. Bartsch, U. Fuchs, T. H. Lippert, O. Bellmann, and D. Gupta, “Stage-dependent depression of melatonin in patients with primary breast cancer. Correlation with prolactin, thyroid stimulating hormone, and steroid receptors,” Cancer, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 426–433, 1989. View at: Google Scholar
  30. R. C. Travis, D. S. Allen, I. S. Fentiman, and T. J. Key, “Melatonin and breast cancer: a prospective study,” Journal of the National Cancer Institute, vol. 96, no. 6, pp. 475–482, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  31. T. Kaczor, “An overview of melatonin and breast cancer,” Natural Medicine Journal, vol. 2, no. 2, 2010, View at: Google Scholar
  32. D. E. Blask, R. T. Dauchy, and L. A. Sauer, “Putting cancer to sleep at night—the neuroendocrine/circadian melatonin signal,” Endocrine, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 179–188, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. D. E. Blask, G. C. Brainard, R. T. Dauchy et al., “Melatonin-depleted blood from premenopausal women exposed to light at night stimulates growth of human breast cancer xenografts in nude rats,” Cancer Research, vol. 65, no. 23, pp. 11174–11184, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. L. Mao, R. T. Dauchy, D. E. Blask et al., “Circadian gating of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in breast cancer cells via melatonin-regulation of GSK3β,” Molecular Endocrinology, vol. 26, no. 11, pp. 1808–1820, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. E. J. Sánchez-Barceló, S. Cos, D. Mediavilla, C. Martínez-Campa, A. González, and C. Alonso-González, “Melatonin-estrogen interactions in breast cancer,” Journal of Pineal Research, vol. 38, pp. 217–222, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2013 Ali Khawaja et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.