Journal of Chemistry

Journal of Chemistry / 2013 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2013 |Article ID 508934 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/508934

Mambo Moyo, Linda Chikazaza, Benias Chomunorwa Nyamunda, Upenyu Guyo, "Adsorption Batch Studies on the Removal of Pb(II) Using Maize Tassel Based Activated Carbon", Journal of Chemistry, vol. 2013, Article ID 508934, 8 pages, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/508934

Adsorption Batch Studies on the Removal of Pb(II) Using Maize Tassel Based Activated Carbon

Academic Editor: Kaustubha Mohanty
Received22 May 2013
Revised31 Jul 2013
Accepted17 Aug 2013
Published17 Sep 2013

Abstract

The demand for clean water is on the increase as rapid industrialization is still contributing to pollution. Nowadays, as water is the basic need for mankind, efforts have gathered momentum to decontaminate it in order to address the acute shortage of clean and pure water. Maize tassel was used as the precursor for making activated carbon for the adsorption of Pb(II) ions. The product obtained was characterized and utilized for the removal of Pb(II) from aqueous solutions over a wide range of initial metal ion concentration (10–50 mg/L), contact time (5–300 min), adsorbent dose (0.1–2.5 g), and pH (2–12). The optimum set of conditions for biosorption of Pb(II) ion were found to be initial concentration 10 mg/L, dosage 1.2 g, and pH 5.4. The adsorption data conformed to both the Langmuir and the Freundlich isotherms but fitted best into the Langmuir model. The for Langmuir equation was 0.9997 and that for Freundlich was 0.9515. The Langmuir monolayer adsorption capacity of the activated carbon was calculated to be 37.31 mg/g. The results indicate that activated carbon might be used to effectively adsorb Pb(II) ions from wastewater treatment plants.

1. Introduction

Nowadays water pollution by heavy metals is fast growing due to natural processes and increasing human activities which include mining, agriculture, and manufacturing industries. These heavy metals are nondegradable and cannot be detoxified biologically [1]. Lead (Pb) is among those contaminants that must be removed from water, due to its high toxicity and tendency to accumulate in tissues of living organisms [24]. Pb can occur in different forms such as organic and inorganic forms. Pb is the most significant toxin of the trace metal ions, and human exposure to the inorganic forms is through ingestion of food, water, and inhalation. The aforementioned form affects mainly the peripheral nervous system and haematopoietic, renal, gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, and reproductive systems. Organic Pb mainly affects the central nervous system. According to World Health Organization [5], the permissible level for Pb in drinking water is 0.05 mg/L. Therefore, it is necessary to remove Pb from wastewaters before discharging into the natural water bodies.

One of the ways to address this problem of water shortage is to treat the polluted water through removal of the contaminants. To date, the removal of metals from water has been previously achieved by various methods such as ion exchange, precipitation, oxidation, reduction, and membrane filtration [6, 7]. Compared with these techniques, adsorption technology, using some cheap, easily available agricultural plants, algal biomass, and cyanobacteria, has been reported [810]. However, the use of raw sorbents in adsorption has its problems since most plants contain a green pigment known as chlorophyll (sparingly soluble in water), and some organic matter may be leached out, consequently affecting the taste and colour of the treated waters [11, 12]. In spite of the versatility of commercial activated carbon as an adsorbent in wastewater treatment due to its high surface area, microporous characteristics, and high adsorption capacity, it remains costly in developing countries [1315]. Hence, the derivation of activated carbon from some natural plant based materials might reduce the highlighted problems. In the recent past, activated carbon sorbents derived from locally available materials such as Ceiba pentandra hulls [16], Euphorbia rigida [17], hazelnut husks [18], wheat bran [19], apple waste [20], coconut shell [21], and Terminalia arjuna nuts [22] have received increasing attention for the removal and recovery of pollutants in aqueous media.

Maize is a versatile cereal crop that is grown widely throughout the world in a range of agroecological environments. Maize is a fast growing, vigorous and tall (2-3 m) cereal crop having broad (5–10 cm), and long (50–100 cm) leaves. Maize tassel, an inexhaustible, nonedible, and renewable polymeric material resource, is the male part of the maize plant which is discarded as waste. As a way to address issues related to sustainability, the lignocellulosic material possesses several desirable characteristics to use an adsorbent (a low cost material, mesoporous) and hence can be used as a good precursor of activated carbon [23].

The present study aims at assessing the adsorption potential of activated carbon prepared from maize tassel for the removal of Pb(II) ions from aqueous solutions. The interactive effects of process parameters such as adsorbent dosage, agitation time, solution pH, and initial concentration on the adsorption capacity of activated carbon towards Pb(II) are demonstrated.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Preparation of Biomass

The maize tassel was collected from Morris farm in Northlea, Gweru, Zimbabwe. This material is a zero-value agricultural waste product. Maize tassel was plucked off the woody parts of the maize plant, thoroughly washed with water, and sun dried for 5 days. The dried biomass was milled and then fractionated using 100–300 μm analytical sieves and washed twice with 0.01 M HCl in order to remove any metals that might be on the biomass.

2.2. Preparation of Activated Carbon

The activate carbon was prepared according to the reported procedures [24, 25]. Briefly, the fractionated maize tassel powder (200 g) was weighed in a clean dry beaker of capacity 1 L containing (200 mL, 97% H2SO4 for 24 h) followed by refluxing in a fume hood for 4 h. After cooling, the reaction mixture was filtered, and the filtrate was washed repeatedly with ultrapure water and soaked in 1% NaHCO3 solution to neutralise any remaining acid. The sample was then washed with distilled water until the pH of the activated carbon was between 6 and 7, dried overnight in an oven at 120°C, and kept in a glass bottle until use.

2.3. Characterization of Prepared Activated Carbon

The bulk density was determined by transferring activated carbon to a 10 mL measuring cylinder of about 1.0 cm diameter. Sufficient quantity of carbon powder was added to occupy a volume of 10 mL under the condition, and it was subsequently weighed. The bulk density was expressed as grams per litre (the weight of the activated carbon filling a graduated cylinder on gentle tapping, divided by the volume of the cylinder 10 mL). The simple specific surface area, loss of mass on ignition, pH, and moisture content were also determined [26, 27]. The FTIR spectra of activatedcarbon were obtained with KBr using Shimadzu model -prestige Fourier Transform Infrared Spectrometer. FTIR spectra were recorded in the region of 4000–400 cm−1. X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) analysis of the activated carbon was carried out on a Bruker D8 Advance X-ray diffractometer using nickel filtered Cu Kα radiation (40 kV, 40 mA). The pH of solutions was measured with a proLab 200 (SCHOTT instruments).

2.4. Adsorbate

A stock solution of 1000 mg/L Pb(II) was prepared by dissolving Pb(NO3)2 (Merck, South Africa) in ultrapure water (resistivity >18 MΩ cm−1) and acidified with 5 mL of concentrated HNO3 to prevent hydrolysis. The progressive dilution procedure of the stock solution was employed in the preparation of working solutions. The pH of the working solutions was adjusted to the required values with 0.1 M NaOH or 0.1 M HCl. All the chemicals used were of analytical reagent grade.

2.5. Batch Adsorption Studies

A weighed amount of activated carbon was introduced into stoppered reagent bottles containing various concentrations with 100 mL aqueous solutions of Pb(II) ions. The suspensions were shaken at room temperature (25 ± 1°C) using a mechanical shaker for a prescribed time at 160 rpm. Scheme 1 shows the schematic representation of the process involved in the derivation of activated carbon from raw maize tassel up to adsorption. The solutions were filtered through Whatman 42 filter paper, and the residual concentration of metal ion was determined by AAS method at 217 nm. The effects of concentration (10–50 mg/L), contact time (5–300 min), solution pH (2–12), and adsorption dose (0.1–2.5 g) were studied. Blank solutions were treated similarly (without adsorbent), and the recorded concentration at the end of each operation was taken as the initial one.

508934.sch.001

The amount of metal adsorbed by activated carbon was calculated from the difference between metal quantity added to the biomass and metal content of the supernatant using where is the metal uptake (mg metal adsorbed per g adsorbent), and are the initial and equilibrium metal concentration in solution (mg/L), is the volume of the solution (mL), and is the weight of activated carbon (g). The percentage of removed Pb (II) ions () in solution was calculated using

2.6. Desorption Studies

For the desorption studies, contact was made between 1.2 g of activated carbon and a 100 mL Pb(II) solution. After Pb(II) ion sorption, the activated carbon was filtered, washed three times with ultrapure water to remove residual Pb(II) ions on the surface, and kept in contact with the 100 mL HCl solution (0.05–0.3 M desorbent). The mixtures were shaken in a rotary shaker. The filtrates were analyzed to determine the concentration of Pb(II) ions after desorption using AAS.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Physicochemical Characteristics of Activated Carbon

The physicochemical characteristics like pH, moisture content, bulk density, surface area, and loss of mass on ignition are shown in Table 1. The bulk density affects the rate of adsorption of metals ions onto activated carbon. In the present study, the bulk density was less than 1.2 indicating that the activated carbon materials are in fine nature and hence enhanced the adsorption of Pb(II) ions from aqueous solution. The moisture content (0.3%) was determined, even though it does not affect the adsorption power, dilutes the adsorbents, and therefore necessitates the use of additional weight of adsorbents to provide the required weight. The surface area of the prepared activated carbon in the present research study was 250 m2/g and is higher than a low cost agro-based adsorbent such as palm pith carbon (188 m2/g) [28] but lower than peanut hull carbon (354 m2/g) [29].


ParameterValue

pH6.9
Moisture (%)0.3
Bulk density (gmL−1)0.52
Surface area (m2/g)250
Particle size range (µm)100–300
% Loss of mass on ignition0.7

The X-ray diffraction pattern of the activated carbon is shown in Figure 1. The XRD spectrum of activated carbon is a typical diffraction pattern of an amorphous material which gives a continuous function and had two partially, not well defined resolved peaks at about 2θ = angle of 22.6 and 26.4 degrees, respectively.

The FT-IR spectrum was obtained for treated activated carbon before (a) and after Pb(II) ion biosorption process (b) (Figure 2). The results showed us that the activated carbon has different functional groups such as amide, hydroxyl, and carboxyl. Some of these functional groups changed after biosorption process. The comparisons of the FT-IR spectra of activated carbon and after Pb(II) biosorption give the following bands and peaks. The bands at 3419.22 and 3454.93 cm−1 are the OH stretching of polymeric compounds. The bands located at 1376.17 and 1591.84 cm−1 are possibly due to the functional groups like C=O in carboxylic groups and carboxylate moieties. The additional small peaks at 1090.55 cm−1 indicate the S=O. The band at 1622.02 cm−1 corresponds to carbonyl stretching vibration of amide considered to be due to the combined effect of double-bond stretching vibration and –NH deformation band for Pb(II) loaded activated carbon. The C=O and S=O functional groups have been reported to show very high coordination with trace metals; hence it disappeared in the Pb(II) loaded [14]. For this reason, the presence of these functional groups may be responsible for good adsorptive behavior of the activated carbon towards the Pb(II) ions.

3.2. Effect of Agitation Time and Initial Concentration on Adsorption

The effect of agitation time is one of the important factors when designing batch sorption systems for economical wastewater treatment plant application. As shown in Figure 3, the relationship between agitation time and Pb(II) ion sorption onto activated carbon at different initial Pb(II) ion concentrations is displayed.

It was observed that 52, 60, 65, and 70% of Pb(II) ions were removed in the first two minutes for the different concentrations (10, 20, 30, and 50 mg/L, resp.), and the process was rapid up to 60 min attaining 91.8% removal for 10 mg/L. Beyond 60 min, the percentage of biosorption is almost constant indicating the attainment of equilibrium conditions. The presence of adequate external surface area on the activated carbon may have boosted the rate of adsorption in the initial stages which was followed by a slower internal diffusion process, which may be the rate determining step [30]. Therefore, all other experiments were conducted at an agitation time of 60 min.

The effect of initial concentration on the percentage removal is also shown in Figure 3. The removal of Pb(II) ions by activated carbon was found to decrease with increase in initial Pb(II) concentration. The observed behavior can be attributed to the increase in the amount of Pb(II) ions to the unchanging number of available active sites on the activated carbon. Hence, more metal ions were left in solution. Thus, it can be said that removal of Pb(II) ion is highly concentration dependent.

3.3. Effect of pH on Adsorption

The effect of initial pH of a solution is a major factor used to determine the adsorption property of an adsorbent from waste water. The possible reasons are its effects on the chemistry of the ions and the activity of functional groups (carboxylate, phosphate, and amino groups) on the cell walls [19, 31]. As revealed in Figure 4, there is a change in the quantity of adsorbed Pb(II) ions on the solid phase of activated carbon by increasing pH of the medium up to a maximum value of pH 5.4. At low pH values, the adsorbent is positively charged since the pH is lower than the isoelectric point or point of zero charge (PZC) [13]. Hence the removal yield of Pb(II) ions is very low due to the electrostatic repulsion forces between positively charged H3O+ and Pb2+ ions. Thereafter the adsorption percentage decreased in alkaline medium perhaps due to the formation of Pb(OH)2 and soluble hydroxyl complexes such as PbOH+, aqueous Pb(OH)2, and Pb(OH)3−, and the activated carbon was deteriorated with the accumulation of Pb(II) ions making true adsorption studies impossible [3234]. Similar trends were reported for adsorption of Pb(II) ions on activated carbon prepared from coconut shell [35], Euphorbia rigida [17], sawdust [36], and mature pods of M. Oleifera containing seeds [37]. The results obtained in this study indicated that the activated carbon is more effective in removing Pb(II) ions from an aqueous system with 96.6% removal as compared to raw maize tassel (75%) [38], tobacco stems (94.37%) [30], and physically prepared AC (78%) [39]. Therefore, pH 5.4 was selected to be the optimum pH for all further studies.

3.4. Effects of Dosage on Adsorption

The effect of biomass dosage on the biosorption of Pb(II) ions was investigated (Figure 5). As shown in Figure 5, the percentage removal increases sharply from 58.5% to 92.2% with increasing dosage from 0.1 to 1.2 g, respectively. Beyond 1.2 g, the percentage was not increased significantly and reached the maximum of 92.3% at dosage of 1.2 g. This phenomenon can be due to the greater availability of active sites or surface area making easier penetration of the Pb(II) ions to the adsorption sites of activated carbon, and increasing beyond dosage of 1.2 g had no much effect after equilibrium is reached. These results are in agreement with other work reported in the literature [2, 34].

3.5. Adsorption Isotherms

Adsorption isotherms are very useful for analyzing the nature of adsorbate-adsorbent interaction. So, in order to optimize the design of a successful adsorption unit to remove trace metal ions from industrial effluents, it is significant to establish the best correlation for the equilibrium isotherms. In this study, the equilibrium data for the adsorbed Pb(II) ions onto activated carbon was expressed using two of the most popular isotherms, namely, Langmuir and Freundlich isotherms.

The Freundlich isotherm [40] is given by

The parameters can be linearized by taking logarithms to determine the parameters and :

A plot of versus gives a straight line, and and can be calculated from the intercept and slope, respectively. The linear form of the Langmuir isotherm model [41] can be represented by

A plot of versus was found to be a straight line with as intercept and as slope, and hence and can be calculated. Figures 6(a) and 6(b) show Freundlich adsorption isotherm and the Langmuir adsorption isotherm, respectively. The Freundlich constants and , Langmuir constants and , and the correlation coefficient are given in Table 2. The calculated value of Freundlich constant is within the range (0.1 < < 1), reported in the literature [42] showing that adsorption is favorable. However, the linearized equation did not give a good correlation for the removal of Pb(II) ions onto activated carbon, indicating that Pb(II) adsorption by activated carbon fits better to the Langmuir model than to the Freundlich model.


Adsorption isothermParameterValue

Langmuir (mg/g)37.31
(L/mg)0.062
0.9997
Freundlich 0.077
0.482
0.9515

In addition, a dimensionless constant called separation factor, , can be used to express an essential feature of Langmuir isotherm [43]: where is the initial concentration (10 mg/L, in this case) of Pb(II). The value of indicates the type of the isotherm to be either unfavorable when , linear if , and favorable if or . The calculated was 0.62 indicating that the adsorption of the Pb(II) was a favorable process. The comparison of maximum monolayer adsorption capacity of Pb(II) ions onto various activated carbons derived from different precursors is given in Table 3. It should be noted that adsorption capacity varies and depends on the characteristics of an individual adsorbent, the extent of surface modification, the analytical method used for decontamination (batch method, column, reactors, etc.), heat treatment temperatures, and the initial concentration of the adsorbate used [26, 44]. As can be seen from Table 3, activated carbon from maize tassel precursor in this work has reasonable adsorption capacity (37.31 mg/g) for Pb(II) ions, closer or higher than some agro-based derived activated carbons but lower than other highly lignocellulosic plants such as Tamarind wood (134.22 mg/g) and cashew nut shell (138.89 mg/g) just to mention a few.


PrecursorActivationConditions: pH; agitation timeMaximum adsorbent (mg/g)Reference

Hazelnut husksChemical activation by ZnCl26.7; 60 min13.05[18]
Coffee residueChemical activation by ZnCl25.8; 2 h63 [23]
Rice huskChemical activation by H3PO4138.89[27]
Coconut shellChemical activation by H2SO44.5; 2 h26.50[35]
Tamarind wood Chemical activation by ZnCl26.5; 50 min43.85[45]
Tamarind wood Chemical activation by H2SO46.5; 40 min134.22 [45]
Cashew nut shellChemical activation by H2SO45.0; 30 min408.6[46]
Sugarcane bagasseChemical activation by H2SO45; not given7.297[47]
Maize tasselChemical activation by H2SO45.4; 60 min37.31This study

3.6. Desorption Studies

For wastewater treatment, regeneration of the adsorbent material is of importance in economic development, since it helps to protect the environment and recycling of the adsorbate (Pb(II) ions) and adsorbent (activated carbon). The successful application of this technique also reduces the dependence on thermal activation, incineration, and land disposal, which directly or indirectly increases environmental pollution [1]. Desorption studies help in process design systems by giving information on the mechanism and recovery of adsorbates from industrial wastewater and the adsorbent. In this study, desorption results are presented in Table 4. It can be observed that desorption rate increases with increase in HCl concentration but attained a constant at 0.2 M HCl.


Initial Pb(II)
concentration (mg/L)
% Pb(II) ion
 removal
% Recovery of Pb(II) ions
0.05 M0.1 M0.2 M0.3 M

10 91.874.2580.5090.6087.65
20 86.770.2177.5483.2980.50
30 83.966.2574.5879.3275.65
50 81.358.265.6570.5268.56

4. Conclusions

Maize tassel, a residue released in a substantial amount in the agricultural sector, was converted into activated carbon. The material under consideration is not only economical but is a waste product. Hence, its use as an adsorbent would on one hand solve the problem of its disposal and on other hand provide an effective adsorbent for the treatment of metal bearing wastewaters. Results from adsorption studies revealed that the percentage removal decreased with increase in the initial concentration of Pb(II) ions suggesting the applicability of the activated carbon at lower concentrations. Adsorption equilibrium for the metal was reached in about 60 min. It was also observed that the adsorption was pH dependent and the maximum Pb removal of 96.6% occurred at pH of 5.4. An increase in the activated carbon dosage leads to an increase in Pb(II) ions removal due to a corresponding increase in the number of active sites.

Acknowledgment

The authors are grateful for the Department of Chemical Technology, Midlands State University, Gweru, Zimbabwe, for providing facilities.

References

  1. P. S. Kumar, “Adsorption of lead(II) ions from simulated wastewater using natural waste: a kinetic, thermodynamic and equilibrium study,” Environmental Progress and Sustainable Energy, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. A. B. Dekhil, Y. Hannachi, A. Ghorbel, and T. Boubaker, “Removal of lead and cadmium ions from aqueous solutions using the macroalga Caulerpa racemosa,” Chemistry and Ecology, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 221–234, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. T. A. Saleh and V. K. Gupta, “Column with CNT/magnesium oxide composite for lead(II) removal from water,” Environmental Science and Pollution Research, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 1224–1228, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. N. M. Mubarak, S. Daniel, M. Khalid, and J. Tan, “Comparative study of functionalize and non-functionalized carbon nanotube for removal of copper from polluted water,” International Journal of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, vol. 3, pp. 1–4, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  5. World Health Organization, Guidelines for Drinking Water Quality, vol. 1-2, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 1984.
  6. A. B. P. Marín, J. F. Ortuño, M. I. Aguilar, V. F. Meseguer, J. Sáez, and M. Lloréns, “Use of chemical modification to determine the binding of Cd(II), Zn(II) and Cr(III) ions by orange waste,” Biochemical Engineering Journal, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 2–6, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. V. K. Gupta, I. Ali, T. A. Saleh, A. Nayak, and S. Agarwal, “Chemical treatment technologies for waste-water recycling—an overview,” The Royal Society of Chemistry, vol. 2, no. 16, pp. 6380–6388, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. J. M. Lezcano, F. González, A. Ballester, M. L. Blázquez, J. A. Muñoz, and C. García-Balboa, “Sorption and desorption of Cd, Cu and Pb using biomass from an eutrophized habitat in monometallic and bimetallic systems,” Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 92, no. 10, pp. 2666–2674, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. K. Mohanty, D. Das, and M. N. Biswas, “Adsorption of phenol from aqueous solutions using activated carbons prepared from Tectona grandis sawdust by ZnCl2 activation,” Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 115, no. 1-2, pp. 121–131, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. K. Mohanty, D. Das, and M. N. Biswas, “Preparation and characterization of activated carbons from Sterculia alata nutshell by chemical activation with zinc chloride to remove phenol from wastewater,” Adsorption, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 119–132, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. J. P. Chen and L. Yang, “Chemical modification of Sargassum sp. for prevention of organic leaching and enhancement of uptake during metal biosorption,” Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, vol. 44, no. 26, pp. 9931–9942, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. I. W. Mwangi, J. C. Ngila, and J. O. Okonkwo, “A comparative study of modified and unmodified maize tassels for removal of selected trace metals in contaminated water,” Toxicological and Environmental Chemistry, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 20–39, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. I. W. Mwangi and J. C. Ngila, “Removal of heavy metals from contaminated water using ethylenediamine-modified green seaweed (Caulerpa serrulata),” Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, vol. 50–52, pp. 111–120, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. M. M. Rao, A. Ramesh, G. P. C. Rao, and K. Seshaiah, “Removal of copper and cadmium from the aqueous solutions by activated carbon derived from Ceiba pentandra hulls,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 129, no. 1–3, pp. 123–129, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. V. K. Gupta, A. Mittal, A. Malviya, and J. Mittal, “Adsorption of carmoisine A from wastewater using waste materials—bottom ash and deoiled soya,” Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, vol. 335, no. 1, pp. 24–33, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. S. Ong, S. Yip, P. Keng, S. Lee, and Y. H. Papaya, “(Carica papaya) seed as a low-cost sorbent for zinc removal,” African Journal of Agricultural Research, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 810–819, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  17. Ö. Gerçel and H. F. Gerçel, “Adsorption of lead(II) ions from aqueous solutions by activated carbon prepared from biomass plant material of Euphorbia rigida,” Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 132, no. 1–3, pp. 289–297, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. M. Imamoglu and O. Tekir, “Removal of copper (II) and lead (II) ions from aqueous solutions by adsorption on activated carbon from a new precursor hazelnut husks,” Desalination, vol. 228, no. 1–3, pp. 108–113, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. A. Özer, “Removal of Pb(II) ions from aqueous solutions by sulphuric acid-treated wheat bran,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 141, no. 3, pp. 753–761, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. R. H. Hasas, A. Arami-Neya, W. M. A. W. Daud, and J. N. Sahu, “Preparation and characterization of activated carbon from apple waste by microwave assisted phosphoric acid activation: application in methylene blue adsorption,” BioResources, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 2950–2966, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  21. O. S. Amuda, A. A. Giwa, and I. A. Bello, “Removal of heavy metal from industrial wastewater using modified activated coconut shell carbon,” Biochemical Engineering Journal, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 174–181, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. K. Mohanty, M. Jha, B. C. Meikap, and M. N. Biswas, “Removal of chromium (VI) from dilute aqueous solutions by activated carbon developed from Terminalia arjuna nuts activated with zinc chloride,” Chemical Engineering Science, vol. 60, no. 11, pp. 3049–3059, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. F. Boudrahem, F. Aissani-Benissad, and H. Aït-Amar, “Batch sorption dynamics and equilibrium for the removal of lead ions from aqueous phase using activated carbon developed from coffee residue activated with zinc chloride,” Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 90, no. 10, pp. 3031–3039, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. A. El Nemr, A. El Sikaily, A. Khaled, and O. Abdelwahab, “Removal of toxic chromium(VI) from aqueous solution by activated carbon using Casuarina equisetifolia,” Chemistry and Ecology, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 119–129, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. A. Esmaeili, S. Ghasemi, and J. Sohrabipour, “Biosorption of copper from wastewater by activated carbon preparation from alga Sargassum sp.,” Natural Product Research, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 341–348, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. K. Nath, S. Panchani, M. S. Bhakhar, and S. Chatrola, “Preparation of activated carbon from dried pods of Prosopis cineraria with zinc chloride activation for the removal of phenol,” Environmental Science and Pollution Research, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 4030–4045, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. A. O. Dada, J. O. Ojediran, and A. P. Olalekan, “Sorption of Pb2+ from aqueous solution unto modified rice husk: isotherms studies,” Advances in Physical Chemistry, vol. 2013, Article ID 842425, 6 pages, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. M. Sathishkumar, A. R. Binupriya, D. Kavitha, and S. E. Yun, “Kinetic and isothermal studies on liquid-phase adsorption of 2,4-dichlorophenol by palm pith carbon,” Bioresource Technology, vol. 98, no. 4, pp. 866–873, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. K. Periasamy and C. Namasivayam, “Removal of copper(II) by adsorption onto peanut hull carbon from water and copper plating industry wastewater,” Chemosphere, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 769–789, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. W. Li, L. Zhang, J. Peng, N. Li, S. Zhang, and S. Guo, “Tobacco stems as a low cost adsorbent for the removal of Pb(II) from wastewater: equilibrium and kinetic studies,” Industrial Crops and Products, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 294–302, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. Z. Reddad, C. Gerente, Y. Andres, and P. Le Cloirec, “Adsorption of several metal ions onto a low-cost biosorbent: kinetic and equilibrium studies,” Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 36, no. 9, pp. 2067–2073, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. S. Doyurum and A. Çelik, “Pb(II) and Cd(II) removal from aqueous solutions by olive cake,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 138, no. 1, pp. 22–28, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. S. Tunali, T. Akar, A. S. Özcan, I. Kiran, and A. Özcan, “Equilibrium and kinetics of biosorption of lead(II) from aqueous solutions by Cephalosporium aphidicola,” Separation and Purification Technology, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 105–112, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. J. R. Srinivasa, R. C. Kesava, and G. Prabhakar, “Optimization of biosorption performance of Casuarina leaf powder for the removal of lead using central composite design,” Journal of Environmental and Analytical Toxicology, vol. 3, article 166, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. M. Sekar, V. Sakthi, and S. Rengaraj, “Kinetics and equilibrium adsorption study of lead(II) onto activated carbon prepared from coconut shell,” Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, vol. 279, no. 2, pp. 307–313, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. R. Ayyappan, A. C. Sophia, K. Swaminathan, and S. Sandhya, “Removal of Pb(II) from aqueous solution using carbon derived from agricultural wastes,” Process Biochemistry, vol. 40, no. 3-4, pp. 1293–1299, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. M. Nadeem, A. Mahmood, S. A. Shahid, S. S. Shah, A. M. Khalid, and G. McKay, “Sorption of lead from aqueous solution by chemically modified carbon adsorbents,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 138, no. 3, pp. 604–613, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. C. M. Zvinowanda, J. O. Okonkwo, M. M. Sekhula, N. M. Agyei, and R. Sadiku, “Application of maize tassel for the removal of Pb, Se, Sr, U and V from borehole water contaminated with mine wastewater in the presence of alkaline metals,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 164, no. 2-3, pp. 884–891, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. O. F. Olorundare, R. W. M. Krause, J. O. Okonkwo, and B. B. Mamba, “Potential application of activated carbon from maize tassel for the removal of heavy metals in water,” Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, vol. 50–52, pp. 104–110, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. H. M. F. Freundlich, “Over the adsorption in solution,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry, vol. 57, pp. 384–470, 1906. View at: Google Scholar
  41. I. Langmuir, “The constitution and fundamental properties of solids and liquids—part I: solids,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 2221–2295, 1916. View at: Google Scholar
  42. C. Raji and T. S. Anirudhan, “Batch Cr(VI) removal by polyacrylamide-grafted sawdust: kinetics and thermodynamics,” Water Research, vol. 32, no. 12, pp. 3772–3780, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. K. R. Hall, L. C. Eagleton, A. Acrivos, and T. Vermeulen, “Pore- and solid-diffusion kinetics in fixed-bed adsorption under constant-pattern conditions,” Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Fundamentals, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 212–223, 1966. View at: Google Scholar
  44. W. C. Lim, C. Srinivasakannan, and N. Balasubramanian, “Activation of palm shells by phosphoric acid impregnation for high yielding activated carbon,” Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, vol. 88, no. 2, pp. 181–186, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. J. Acharya, J. N. Sahu, C. R. Mohanty, and B. C. Meikap, “Removal of lead(II) from wastewater by activated carbon developed from Tamarind wood by zinc chloride activation,” Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 149, no. 1–3, pp. 249–262, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. P. S. Kumar, S. Ramalingam, R. V. Abhinaya, K. V. Thiruvengadaravi, P. Baskaralingam, and S. Sivanesan, “Lead(II) adsorption onto sulphuric acid treated cashew nut shell,” Separation Science and Technology, vol. 46, no. 15, pp. 2436–2449, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. M. Á. Martín-Lara, I. L. R. Rico, I. D. L. C. A. Vicente, G. B. García, and M. C. de Hoces, “Modification of the sorptive characteristics of sugarcane bagasse for removing lead from aqueous solutions,” Desalination, vol. 256, no. 1–3, pp. 58–63, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2013 Mambo Moyo et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views6969
Downloads2602
Citations

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted research articles as well as case reports and case series related to COVID-19. Review articles are excluded from this waiver policy. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.