Research Article

Anticorrosive Performance of Zinc Phosphate Coatings on Mild Steel Developed Using Galvanic Coupling

Table 3

  Loss in weight due to corrosion obtained for panels phosphated under galvanically coupled and uncoupled conditions evaluated by ARE salt droplet test.

System studiedLoss in weight* (g/m2)

Uncoupled mild steel29.10
Mild steel coupled with stainless steel (area ratio of MS to SS—1 : 1)27.24
Mild steel coupled with stainless steel (area ratio of MS to SS—1 : 2)26.71
Mild steel coupled with stainless steel (area ratio of MS to SS—1 : 3)16.18
Mild steel coupled with nickel (area ratio of MS to Ni—1 : 1)25.55
Mild steel coupled with nickel (area ratio of MS to Ni—1 : 2)24.00
Mild steel coupled with nickel (area ratio of MS to Ni—1 : 3)23.25
Mild steel coupled with brass (area ratio of MS to brass—1 : 1)29.25
Mild steel coupled with brass (area ratio of MS to brass—1 : 2)18.00
Mild steel coupled with brass (area ratio of MS to brass—1 : 3)17.65
Mild steel coupled with copper (area ratio of MS to Cu—1 : 1)18.13
Mild steel coupled with copper (area ratio of MS to Cu—1 : 2)17.50
Mild steel coupled with copper (area ratio of MS to Cu—1 : 3)16.00
Mild steel coupled with titanium (area ratio of MS to Ti—1 : 1)13.00
Mild steel coupled with titanium (area ratio of MS to Ti—1 : 2)12.00
Mild steel coupled with titanium (area ratio of MS to Ti—1 : 3)10.05

*Average of five determinations.