Research Article

Comparative Evaluation of the Antidiabetic Effects of Different Parts of Cassia fistula Linn, a Southeast Asian Plant

Table 2

Effect of oral administration of methanolic and aqueous extracts of Cassia fistula Linn bark, leaves, flower, and pods on blood glucose concentration in normal rats.

Experimental groupBlood glucose concentration (mg/dL)
0 h1 h2 h4 h8 h

Normal control 8 5 . 3 ± 2 . 4 8 4 . 0 ± 2 . 4 8 6 . 3 ± 2 . 1 8 2 . 3 ± 3 . 5 7 9 . 8 ± 3 . 4
Glibenclamide (2.5 mg/kg) 8 7 . 3 ± 2 . 6 7 9 . 7 ± 3 . 4 7 0 . 2 ± 1 . 4 c 6 1 . 0 ± 3 . 1 c 5 6 . 0 ± 2 . 0 c
BME 250 mg/kg 8 5 . 7 ± 3 . 2 8 4 . 5 ± 2 . 4 8 0 . 8 ± 3 . 4 7 6 . 3 ± 1 . 7 7 0 . 3 ± 3 . 3
BAE 250 mg/kg 8 5 . 3 ± 2 . 6 8 2 . 0 ± 2 . 0 8 0 . 0 ± 2 . 4 7 6 . 7 ± 2 . 8 7 1 . 0 ± 3 . 1
BME 500 mg/kg 8 6 . 7 ± 2 . 7 8 0 . 0 ± 3 . 0 7 3 . 7 ± 3 . 9 a 6 8 . 0 ± 1 . 5 b 6 2 . 3 ± 2 . 1 b
BAE 500 mg/kg 8 7 . 8 ± 2 . 8 8 4 . 8 ± 3 . 7 8 1 . 0 ± 3 . 2 7 6 . 5 ± 3 . 2 7 0 . 7 ± 2 . 5
LME 250 mg/kg 8 1 . 3 ± 1 . 7 8 0 . 0 ± 3 . 0 7 8 . 3 ± 2 . 7 7 5 . 0 ± 2 . 8 7 0 . 5 ± 3 . 9
LAE 250 mg/kg 8 2 . 3 ± 3 . 3 8 0 . 3 ± 3 . 3 7 8 . 7 ± 3 . 1 7 5 . 5 ± 1 . 9 7 1 . 7 ± 2 . 4
LME 500 mg/kg 8 4 . 1 ± 2 . 5 8 0 . 0 ± 3 . 0 7 6 . 2 ± 3 . 4 7 1 . 5 ± 3 . 1 a 6 5 . 3 ± 2 . 0 b
LAE 500 mg/kg 8 6 . 0 ± 3 . 6 8 3 . 3 ± 2 . 5 8 1 . 5 ± 2 . 6 7 6 . 3 ± 2 . 7 7 0 . 2 ± 3 . 2
FME 250 mg/kg 8 7 . 1 ± 2 . 7 8 4 . 7 ± 3 . 4 8 2 . 0 ± 2 . 0 7 5 . 8 ± 2 . 5 7 1 . 3 ± 2 . 4
FAE 250 mg/kg 8 2 . 5 ± 2 . 8 8 3 . 3 ± 2 . 7 7 9 . 2 ± 2 . 1 7 6 . 2 ± 1 . 2 7 0 . 2 ± 2 . 2
FME 500 mg/kg 8 0 . 0 ± 1 . 5 7 9 . 2 ± 2 . 7 7 8 . 4 ± 4 . 8 7 4 . 7 ± 2 . 1 7 3 . 5 ± 2 . 7
FAE 500 mg/kg 8 6 . 2 ± 2 . 5 8 4 . 8 ± 3 . 8 8 3 . 3 ± 3 . 5 7 9 . 0 ± 3 . 2 7 4 . 0 ± 2 . 7
PME 250 mg/kg 8 5 . 8 ± 3 . 5 8 3 . 3 ± 1 . 1 8 3 . 7 ± 1 . 8 8 0 . 3 ± 3 . 3 8 5 . 7 ± 3 . 2
PAE 250 mg/kg 8 4 . 0 ± 2 . 7 8 3 . 3 ± 3 . 3 8 2 . 9 ± 3 . 2 7 9 . 0 ± 2 . 1 8 5 . 7 ± 3 . 2
PME 500 mg/kg 8 3 . 3 ± 2 . 7 8 0 . 2 ± 3 . 4 7 9 . 3 ± 1 . 9 7 6 . 0 ± 2 . 7 8 5 . 7 ± 3 . 2
PAE 500 mg/kg 8 2 . 0 ± 2 . 5 8 0 . 3 ± 1 . 3 7 8 . 3 ± 2 . 6 7 6 . 3 ± 2 . 2 8 5 . 7 ± 3 . 2

Values are mean ± SEM ( 𝑛 = 6 ). 𝑃 value: a < 0.05, b < 0.01, c < 0.001 as compared with normal control group (by one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison test).