Journal of Chemistry

Journal of Chemistry / 2013 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2013 |Article ID 727149 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/727149

M. H. EL-Saeid, M. T. Selim, "Multiresidue Analysis of 86 Pesticides Using Gas Chromatography Mass Spectrometry: II-Nonleafy Vegetables", Journal of Chemistry, vol. 2013, Article ID 727149, 10 pages, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/727149

Multiresidue Analysis of 86 Pesticides Using Gas Chromatography Mass Spectrometry: II-Nonleafy Vegetables

Academic Editor: Michele Del Carlo
Received20 Jun 2012
Revised18 Jul 2012
Accepted19 Jul 2012
Published02 Oct 2012

Abstract

A total of 1057 samples of fresh vegetables from import and domestic production were analyzed (cold pepper, egg plant, carrot, cucumber, potato, hot pepper, cultivation tomato, squash, beans, okra, onions, cauliflower, and green house tomato). The aim of this study was to investigate pesticide residues in market foods in Riyadh, which have been collected from Riyadh Development Company (Al-Tamer Vegetables Market). Pesticide residues were determined by gas chromatography with mass selective detector (GC-MSD). A multiresidue method was developed and described for simultaneous determination of 86 pesticides commonly used in crop protection. This method used to determine 86 pesticide residues with a broad range of physicochemical properties in fresh vegetables related to organophosphorus (OPP), organochlorines (OCP), pyrethroids, and carbamates mainly used in agriculture. Sample extract was cleaned up by using AOAC method. Pesticide residues above the maximum residue limits (MRL) were detected in 15.89% of the total samples (168 from 1057 samples), but 83.90% of the total samples (887 from 1057 samples) has no residues or contained pesticide residues at or below MRL. The detected and most frequently found pesticide residues were permethrin (45 times) and endosulfan (34 times) followed by deltamethrin (27 times). The findings of this study pointed to the following recommendations: the need for a monitoring program for pesticide residues in imported food crops.

1. Introduction

Fresh vegetables are an important part of a healthy diet as they are a significant source of vitamins and minerals. However, fresh vegetables can also be a source of noxious toxic substances—pesticides. Vegetables are traded worldwide and the list of pesticides that might have been applied in their agricultural production is usually not known [13].

Pesticides constitute a very important group of chemical compounds that have to be controlled due to their high toxicity and their widespread use in agricultural practice for field and postharvest protection. The presence of pesticide residues in food is a direct result of pesticide use on crops. Over 1000 compounds may be applied to agricultural crops in order to control undesirable moulds, insects, and weeds [4]. The pesticide residues causing food contamination have become increasingly frequent in recent years raising question about their human health and economic consequences [5]. Widespread contamination of water, air, and soil by chemicals and industrial pollutants means that the crops that we grow and the animals we use for food are often exposed to toxic substances [6].

The levels of pesticide residues in foodstuffs are generally legislated so as to minimize the exposure of the consumer to harmful or unnecessary intakes of pesticides, to ensure the proper use of pesticides in terms of granted authorization and registration (application rates and preharvested intervals), and to permit the free circulation of pesticide-treated products, as long as they comply with the fixed maximum residue limits (MRLs). MRL for pesticide residues represents the maximum concentration of that residue (expressed in mg/kg) that is legally permitted in specific food items. The establishment of MRL is based on good agricultural practice data on food derived from commodities. MRLs are not toxicological limits, but they must be toxicologically acceptable. Exceeded MRLs are strong indicators of violations of good agricultural practices [79].

A multiresidue method is described for determination of 86 pesticides commonly used in crop protection. Good sensitivity and selectivity of the method are obtained with limits of quantification 0.01 mg/kg in almost all cases. The method was applied very satisfactorily to routine analysis as a complement to traditional GC-MS method and finally, limit of detection was also 10–20 times lower than maximum residue levels (MRL) established by codex alimentarius commission. More than 500 samples from leafy vegetables have been collected from vegetables market (Riyadh Development Company) in Riyadh. Pesticide residues were detected in 24.69% of the total samples (140 from 567 samples) and pesticides concentration was higher than MRL in 104 samples [10].

The objective of this study was to investigate the presence of pesticide residues in nonleafy vegetables in food market in Saudi Arabia. Samples were collected from the central market located in Riyadh (Al-Tamer Vegetables Market), during two years, that is, 2007-2008. Collected data are to be used as a reference point for future monitoring and taking preventive measures to minimize human health risks.

2. Materials and Method

2.1. Reagents and Equipments

All pesticide standards were obtained from (Riedel de Haen and Supelco). We prepared 1 mg/mL stock solution of each by dissolving 20 mg of the pure analytical standard in 20 mL of acetone. A single composite standard solution was prepared by diluting with acetone according to limit of detection (LOD). All standard solutions were stored in glass-stoppered flasks at 4°C. Mixed compound calibration solutions were prepared in acetone and they were used as spiking solution. Solvents (residue analysis grade) used were acetone, acetonitrile, petroleum ether, and other reagents such as sodium chloride and anhydrous sodium sulphate; florisil 60–100 mesh for residue analysis was also purchased from (Fluka). The florisil (activated magnesium silicate used as adsorbent) and anhydrous sodium sulphate were activated at 100°C over night and stored in 500 mL glass flask with glass stoppers and stored in oven at 100°C. The equipments used included a high-speed blender with a stainless steel jar (waring, USA), a shaking separation final (GFL, Germany), a rotary evaporator, R 215 and cooler circulator chiller B-740 (Buchi, Switzerland), Buchner funnel and chromatographic tubes with Teflon stopcocks and course fritted glass (Agilent, USA), and syringes (Hamilton Bonadus AG, Switzerland). All glassware were rinsed thoroughly using soap and deionization water, then washed with acetone and dried in oven (100–130°C) over night

2.2. Samples Collection

This study was conducted during two years from January 2007 to December 2008. More than 500 nonleafy vegetable samples (cold pepper, egg plant, carrot, cucumber, potato, hot pepper, cultivation tomato, squash, beans, okra, onions, cauliflower, and green house tomato) have been collected from Al-Tamer Vegetables Market in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Samples were put in sterile polythene bags and transported to the laboratory where they were analyzed immediately or stored at 4°C until analysis within 24 h.

2.3. Sample Preparation, Extraction, and Partitioning

The chopped samples of raw nonleafy vegetable (120 g) were placed in a stainless steel jar 1L and extracted with 200 mL of acetonitrile and 10 g celite, the blender was vigorously homogenized into high speed for 2 min, and the mixture was filtrated by using Buchner funnel fitted with shark-skin filter paper into 500 mL suction flask (Buchi, Switzerland). An aliquot of organic was transferred to 1L separator funnel and added 100 mL of petroleum ether (PE) and the mixture was vigorously shaken for 1-2 min and then was added 100 ml saturated solution of NaCl and 600 water. The mixture was vigorously mixed and the separator funnel was allowed to be held at horizontal position for few minutes. The aqueous layer was discarded and the solvent layer was washed with twice time 100 mL portions of distilled water and the washed layer was transferred into 100 mL beaker and washed with 15 g of anhydrous sodium sulphate. Finally, the extract was concentrated to 5 mL volume and transferred directly to florisil column ( ).

2.4. Minimum Detection Limit (MDL)

To determine the maximum residue limits (MRL), retention time (Rt), limit of quantification (LOQ), ion target, qualifier ions by scan mode, and perform the GC-MS quantification (Table 1) by using a four-point calibration curve plotting peak area versus mg l−1 concentration of 86 pesticides using the dilution levels ranged from 0.0001 to 5.00 mg l−1.


NumberCompoundsRetention time
min
LOQTarget ion
Qualifier ions

1Dichlorvos7.2110.0210918579
2Propamocarb9.8490.045871129
3Mevinphos10.8280.09127192109
4Chloroneb13.0150.01191193206
5Methomyl14.8370.101058857
6Propachlor16.3500.0212077176
7Propoxur16.4400.0311015281
8Ethoprophos17.1830.0515797139
9Bendiocarb18.8080.01151126166
10Sulfotep19.3500.0132220297
11Alfa-BHC19.4490.02183181219
12Hexachlorobenzene19.9490.05284249142
13Dichloran20.4120.03176206124
14Dimethoate20.6940.028793125
15Simazine21.2400.01201186173.2
16Carbofuran21.5170.01164149123
17Lindane21.9530.01219181111
18Fonofos22.8370.06109137246
19Delta-BHC23.9340.05181219111
20Diazinon24.1810.03179137152
21Iprobenfos25.4720.0491204122
22Pirimicarb26.1940.0516672238
23Dichlofenthion26.8690.01279223162
24Phosphamidon I27.0740.0312772264
25Phosphamidon II27.1050.0512772264
26Chlorpyrifos-Me27.5300.03286125288
27Vinclozolin27.6430.02212285187
28Carbaryl27.8460.03144115116
29Alachlor28.2920.04160188146
30Ronnal28.7380.02285287125
31Metalaxyl28.8940.05206146192.2
32Fenitrothion30.0040.07277125109
33Linuron30.1180.0461187124
34Aldrin30.4170.026626391
35Thiobencarb30.7940.0810072125
36Malathion31.3100.0312717399
37Fenthion31.6790.03278125109
38Pirimiphos-ethyl34.2790.05318333304
39Captan34.7910.0679151114
40Chlorfenvenphos35.5490.02267323269
41Chlordane-trans35.9900.04373375237
42Alfa-endosulfan36.9190.09239237195
43Nanchlor-trans37.1680.01409100237
44Chlordane-cis37.3110.05 375373377
45Disulfoton sulfone37.6700.0321315397
46Dieldrin39.1720.027926581
47P,P-DDE39.6880.01246318248
48O,P-DDD40.3210.01235237165
49Endrin40.9200.02263265281
50Beta-endosulfan41.8200.03207239195
51Chlorobenzilate42.6830.04251139253
52P,P-DDD43.2340.01235237165
53Benodanil43.7730.03231323203
54Ethion44.1310.0123197153
55Carbophenothion45.5580.04157121125
56Resmethrin I48.9650.03123171143
57Resmethrin II49.5320.03123171143
58Hexabromobenzene49.7720.04551554549
59Phosmet50.3000.0316016177
60EPN50.7260.04157169185
61Dicofol50.9550.02139111251
62Fenoxycarb51.0400.07255186116
63Tetramethrin II51.3220.0216412381
64Tetradifon52.0290.05159111229
65Mirex52.4600.01272274270
66Furathiocarb52.6200.0416357164
67Amitraz53.3730.03132121147
68Lambda-cyhalothrin53.7700.05181197208
69Azenophos-ethyl53.8820.0313216077
70Allethrin I54.5150.0412318181
71Allethrin II54.5230.0412318181
72Allethrin III54.5900.0412318181
73Permethrin I54.8910.02183163165
74Permethrin II55.1110.02183163165
75Coumaphos55.1650.02263226109
76Cyfluthrin III55.8550.05163165226
77Cyfluthrin I55.9970.04163165226
78Cyfluthrin IV56.1030.04163165226
79Cyfluthrin II56.1620.04163165226
80Cypermethrin II56.2840.03163165181
81Cypermethrin IV56.4240.03163165181
82Cypermethrin I56.5220.03163165181
83Cypermethrin III56.5750.03163165181
84Fenvalerate I57.4540.05125167281
85Fenvalerate II57.7160.03125167281
86Deltamethrin58.4400.02253181281

2.5. Florisil Column Cleanup

Florisil column cleanup was conducted according to the AOAC [11]. The column was peppered containing about 12 cm activated florisil topped with 1 cm anhydrous sodium sulphate, and column was washed by 40 mL petroleum ether (PE) and was added extract concentrated to 5 mL and was allowed to pass through the column. The walls of the tube were rinsed additional small portions of petroleum ether and elute at 5 mL/min with 200 mL 6% eluting solvent (diethyl ether in petroleum ether) (PE), and then 200 mL 15% and finally 200 ml 50% eluting solvent (diethyl ether in PE) at 5 mL/min.

2.6. Chromatographic Instrumentation and Quantification

Gas chromatograph-mass spectrometer (Aglient model 6890N) gas chromatograph coupled with (model 5975B) quadrupole mass spectrometer with a GC column HP-5MS 5% phenyl and 95% methyl siloxane, 30 m 0.25 mm id 0.25 μm film thickness. GC operating conditions: splitless injection, injector temperature 250°C, helium carrier gas (99.9999 purity) at flow rate 0.9 mL/min with column head pressure 7.4 psi, oven temperature from 70°C (2 min hold), then raised to 130°C at the rate (25°C/min) afterwards raised to 220°C at (2°C/min) and then raised to 280°C at (10°C/min) and eventually (4.6 min hold). The sample (1μL) was injected in split less modes. The MS system was routinely set in selective ion monitoring (SIM) mode and each compound was quantitated based on peak area using one target and one or two qualifier ion. Mass spectrometer parameter was set as follows: electron impact ionization mode with 70 eV electron energy and scan mass range 100–400 at 0.62 sec/cycle. Ion source temperature 230°C, MS quad temperature 150°C, EM voltage 1450, and solvent delay 4 in.

3. Results and Discussion

A multiresidue procedure was carried out to monitor the pesticide residues in a wide range of the most common consumed non leafy vegetables samples collected during two years, that is, 2007-2008. The analyzed samples composed of thirteen species of non leafy vegetables, that is, hot pepper, bell pepper, onions, potato, cucumber, okra, bean, carrot, cultivation tomato, green house tomato, squash, egg plant, and cauliflower. A wide range of pesticide residues were detected and quantified in the analyzed samples during the two years of this study. In 2007, it was detected the residues of 31 pesticides while in 2008 it was detected the residues of 28 pesticides.

3.1. Pesticide Residues in Nonleafy Vegetables during the Year of 2007

Data in Table (2) shows the amounts of the detected pesticide residues in non leafy vegetable samples from different farms and locations collected from Al-tamer vegetables market in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia during the year of 2007. According to the detected pesticides, it is clear that there are a wide range of compounds which included insecticides (31 compounds), herbicides (four compounds, that is, linuron, simazine, alachlor, and aldrin), and fungicides (one compound, that is, tetradifon). The detected insecticide residues which represent the majority of the detected compounds, it was found that such insecticides could be classified chemically into their major four chemical groups, that is, organochlorines, organophosphorus, pyrethroids, and carbamates. The detected organochlorines substances were six insecticides, that is, chloroneb, lindane, endosulfan, dicloran, mirex, and P,P-DDD while the organophosphorus insecticides included nine agents, that is, chlorpyrifos, dimethoate, malathion, mevinphos, disulfoton, phosmet, ethoprophos, diazinon and iprobenfos. As for pyrethroids, it was detected of seven compounds included permethrin, deltamethrin, cypermethrin, λ-cyhalothrin, cyfluthrin, fenvalerate, and resmethrin. For carbamates, only three compounds were detected, that is, carbaryl, bendiocarb, and thiobencarb. The mentioned pesticides were detected in thirteen non leafy vegetables, included hot pepper, cold pepper, onions, potato, cucumber, okra, bean, carrot, and cultivation tomato, green house tomato, squash, egg plant, cauliflower.

According to the detected pesticides in and/or on the non leafy vegetables (Table 2) involved in this study, it was observed that total numbers of the detected compounds were found in cold pepper followed by cucumber, hot pepper, potato, okra, bean, carrot, squash, egg plant, cultivation tomato, green house tomato, onions, and cauliflower. The total number of the detected compounds in such leafy vegetables in this study was 10, 9, 8, 8, 8, 8, 8, 7, 7, 5, 4, 3, and 1 compound, respectively.


PesticideHot pepperCold pepperOnionsPotatoCucumberOkraBeanCarrotTomato outTomato inSquashEgg plantCauliflowerFreq.

Chloroneb0.0060.030.0063.00
Lindane0.0090.0070.0020.0060.0390.0026.00
Endosulfan0.1190.0630.0410.0040.0465.00
Dicloran0.0061.00
Mirex0.0071.00
Chlordane0.0020.0120.0170.0050.0145.00
P,P-DDD0.0030.0012.00
Chlorpyrifos0.0020.0032.00
Diazinon0.0390.1422.00
Dimethoate0.0070.0130.0340.0124.00
Phosmet0.0221.00
Mevinphos0.0080.00122.00
Malathion0.00291.00
Disulfoton0.0111.00
Iprobenfos0.0060.0170.0023.00
Ethoprophos0.0051.00
Deltamethrin0.060.0250.010.1650.0360.1530.2280.0628.00
Cyfluthrin1.0220.00142.00
Permethrin0.0860.00140.1290.0590.1020.1060.1740.2120.0080.0220.062311.00
Resmethrin0.0120.0070.013.00
Cypermethrin0.0581.00
Lambda-cyhalothrin0.0011.00
Fenvalerate0.1310.0230.0870.0363.00
Carbaryl0.00120.0090.00220.14.00
Bendiocarb0.0051.00
Thiobencarb0.0011.00
Endrin0.0251.00
Linuron0.0090.0040.0060.0040.0035.00
Simazine0.0071.00
Alachlor0.0130.0022.00
Aldrin0.0211.00
Number DC8.0010.003.008.009.008.008.008.005.004.007.007.001.00

Total detected0.2641.5070.06540.2930.2960.0890.1630.3020.2390.050.1860.4570.062

The data tabulated in Table 2 also showed the detected amounts of pesticide residues in non leafy vegetables could be ranked in descending order as follows: cold pepper, egg plant, carrot, cucumber, potato, hot pepper, cultivation tomato, squash, bean, okra, onions, cauliflower, and green house tomato which represent the lower non leafy vegetable contained pesticide residues. In terms of figures, the sum of the detected pesticide residues in such non leafy vegetables were 1.507, 0.457, 0.302, 0.296, 0.293, 0.264, 0.239, 0.186, 0.163, 0.089, 0.0654, 0.062, and 0.05 ppm, respectively. From such ranking, it was observed that cold pepper, egg plant, and carrot were the most contaminated non leafy vegetables.

The frequency of the detected pesticide residues was calculated in the analyzed non leafy vegetables, it was found that the most frequent compounds was permethrin followed by deltamethrin and linden, endosulfan, chlordane, linuron, dimethoate, phosmet, and carbaryl. In terms of figures, the frequencies for these pesticides were 11, 8, 6, 5, 5, 5, 4, and 4, respectively. The other detected compounds were frequented from three to one time. From the presented results it could conclude that cold pepper, egg plant, and carrot were the most contaminated non leafy vegetables, and the pyrethroids are the most frequented pesticides during the year of 2007.

3.2. Pesticide Residues in Leafy Vegetables during 2008

In the agriculture season of 2008, data represented the detected amounts of pesticide residues in non leafy vegetables collected during the season of 2008 are listed in Table 3. According to the detected amounts and/or compounds, it was observed that the pattern of the detected pesticide residues in the collected non leafy vegetable samples were slightly differed from those presented in 2007 season. For example, in 2008 season, it was found the chloroneb, lindane, endosulfan, dicloran, and P,P-DDD as organochlorine compound, diazinon, phosphamidon, sulfotep, dimethoate, and mevinphos as organophosphorus, cypermethrin, deltamethrin, cyfluthrin, permethrin, resmethrin, tetramethrin, lambda cyhlothrin, and fenvalerate as pyrethroids. Also, it was detected propoxur, carbofuran, propamocarb, and bendiocarb as carbamates insecticides. As for fungicides, it found benomyl, tetradifon, and chlorobenzilate. As for the detected amounts, it is clear that cypermethrin represented the highest amounts of the detected residues which ranged between 0.086 and 0.762 ppm while the other detected concentrations were ranged between 0.077 and 0.0003 ppm. Overall, the pesticide residues which were found in this study were approximatly similar to other studies [1214].


PesticideHot PepperCold PepperOnionsPotatoCucumberOkraBeanCarrotTomato outTomato inSquashEgg PlantCauliflowerFreq.

Chloroneb0.0040.0182.00
Lindane0.00850.0022.00
Endosulfan0.0180.1170.0760.03950.1580.0886.00
Dicloran0.02650.0870.1040.0030.0415.00
P,P-DDD0.0380.0272.00
Diazinon0.0330.12.00
Phosphamidon0.0041.00
Sulfotep0.071.00
Dimethoate0.0120.0150.0510.014.00
Mevinphos0.0541.00
Malathion0.0051.00
Deltamethrin0.0150.0310.0470.0774.00
Cyfluthrin0.110.1050.1160.5744.00
Permethrin0.0950.0050.0850.0574.00
Resmethrin0.150.250.0110.0044.00
Tetramethrin0.0011.00
Cypermethrin0.4660.1380.2780.0860.7620.1780.2067.00
Lambda-cyhalothrin0.00030.0022.00
Fenvalerate0.0650.2370.0773.00
Bendcarb0.0020.0662.00
Propoxur0.050.0010.0013.00
Carbofuran0.0050.00140.0023.00
Propamocarb0.0130.0340.0140.020.040.0260.0117.00
Amitraz0.01350.0042.00
Metalaxyl0.0020.0110.0060.0044.00
Tetradifon0.0020.0022.00
Chlorobenzilate0.0070.0180.0130.0080.0125.00
Benomyl0.0021.00
Number DC5.009.008.009.0012.007.006.003.004.007.006.007.004.00

Total detected 0.1830.8330.3440.2980.4850.6940.2160.2980.0570.8490.1931.0410.308

In addition, based on the number of detected residues, in non leafy samples, could be ranked in descending order as follow cucumber, cold pepper, potato, onions, okra, green house tomato, egg plant, bean, squash, hot pepper, cultivation tomato, cauliflower, and carrot. The detected number of compound residues was 12.0, 9.0, 9.0, 8.0, 7.0, 7.0, 7.0, 6.0, 6.0, 5.0, 4.0, 4.0, and 3.0, respectively. As for the detected amounts of the mentioned pesticides, the ranking of non leafy samples becomes different to be egg plant is the most contaminated leafy samples followed by green house tomato < cold pepper < okra < cucumber < onions < cauliflower < carrot < potato < bean < squash < hot pepper < cultivation tomato. In terms of figures, the total detected amounts are 1.041, 0.849, 0.833, 0.694, 0.485, 0.344, 0.308, 0.298, 0.298, 0.216, 0.193, 0.183, and 0.057 ppm, for the mentioned leafy samples, respectively. In case of the frequencies of pesticide residues between the collected vegetables samples, it was observed that cypermethrin was the most frequented compound followed by endosulfan followed by dicloran and chlorobenzilate in which their frequencies were 7.0, 6.0, 5.0, and 5.0, respectively. The other detected compounds were frequented from four to one time. However, the presented data of 2008 season clearly shows that egg plant samples were the most contaminated non leafy vegetables followed by cold pepper, okra, and cucumber while hot pepper and cultivation tomato were the lowest contaminated vegetable samples. Data was mentioned previously partially in agreement with [15, 16].

The detected amounts of pesticide residues during the two mentioned seasons, that is, 2007/20008, were compared with that MRL values; it could calculate the average of percentage of non leafy vegetable samples contained amounts of residues exceeds the MRL values as listed in Table 4. From such data, it is clear that the majority of the analyzed vegetable samples collected in 2007 contained exhibited higher values than those of 2008 except five non leafy vegetables, that is, cold pepper, onions, beans, egg plant, and cauliflower which were higher in their values than those of 2007. In addition, when the analyzed samples distributed between the four mainly seasons of each year, that is, winter, spring, summer, and autumn (based on the analyzed date), neither correlation nor trend could be observed between the pesticide residues content and the mentioned season. The selected plant foods will not give a for adverse biological effects to take place providing the residues of pesticides are controlled to be kept to a minimum. Pesticides residue monitoring programs should then be implemented to assure the minimum allowable residue levels in plant foods, especially with regards to permethrin, endosulfan, and deltamethrin [17].


SeasonYearSelected samples
Cooled PepperHot PepperOnionPotatoCucumberOkraBeansCarrotTomato outTomato inSquashEgg plantCauliflowerMean %

Winter20070.0033.330.0016.6750.00100.0020.0033.33100.0025.0033.330.000.0031.67
Spring60.0020.000.0033.3360.0021.5042.8625.0033.3328.5737.500.000.0027.85
Summer20.0016.670.0020.0029.4123.0828.5710.000.008.338.3314.290.0013.74
Autumn11.117.690.009.090.0018.1815.3812.5014.298.330.0017.650.008.79

Mean percentage22.7819.420.0019.7734.8540.6926.7020.2136.9117.5619.797.990.00

Winter200813.3321.0511.1116.675.00100.000.0010.000.0030.0010.009.0914.2918.50
Spring0.000.0016.6716.6722.2240.0020.0025.000.005.0028.5725.00100.0023.01
Summer50.0040.000.008.3350.0050.0025.000.00100.000.0050.0014.290.0029.82
Autumn25.0028.5712.5020.007.6920.0028.570.000.0033.3328.5710.0025.0018.40

Mean percentage23.757.6422.5013.3313.5717.0529.1714.588.7516.6719.1727.9814.58

The results of the detected amounts of pesticide residues in the selected vegetable, it is therefore clear that patterns of pesticide use are crop dependent: the predominant use of pesticides in vegetables is mainly to control a wide range of pests. In addition, the obtained results clearly indicate the actual situation of the misuse of insecticides which may affect in turn at long period the consumers health, and the most reasonable explanation for the highly detected pesticide residues in cold pepper, egg plant, and carrot may be due to the intensive use of insecticides and the highly deposited amounte of the applied compounds on the broad leafs of such vegetables. Overall, insecticides found in this study were similar to those found in other studies [12, 13, 1821].

4. Conclusion

However, the detected amounts of the mentioned insecticides in these important non leafy vegetables make the necessary to continue the pesticide residue monitoring programs which must be implemented to assure the minimum allowable residue levels in plant foods. With the LLC and GCMS multiresidue method, the optimum conditions were met to extract and determined 86 pesticides in more than 1057 vegetable samples less time and low detection limit (0.001 ppm). The samples no residues and contained pesticide residues at or below MRL were detected in 83.90%. Meanwhile, the detected pesticides concentration had exceeded the MRL in 15.89% of the total tested samples.

Acknowledgment

This project was supported by King Saud University, Deanship of Scientific Research and College of Food and Agriculture Sciences Research Center.

References

  1. M. H. El-Saeid, New techniques for residue analysis of pesticides in foods [Ph.D. thesis], Texas Southern University; Al-Azhar University, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo, Egypt, 1999.
  2. H. J. Stan, “Pesticide residue analysis in foodstuffs applying capillary gas chromatography with mass spectrometric detection - State-of-the-art use of modified DFG-multimethod S19 and automated data evaluation,” Journal of Chromatography A, vol. 892, no. 1-2, pp. 347–377, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. M. Okihashi, Y. Kitagawa, K. Akutsu, H. Obana, and Y. Tanaka, “Rapid method for the determination of 180 pesticide residues in foods by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry and flame photometric detection,” Journal of Pesticide Science, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 368–377, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. D. Ortelli, P. Edder, and C. Corvi, “Multiresidue analysis of 74 pesticides in fruits and vegetables by liquid chromatography-electrospray-tandem mass spectrometry,” Analytica Chimica Acta, vol. 520, no. 1-2, pp. 33–45, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. M. E. Smith, E. O. van Ravenswaay, and R. S. Thompson, “Sales loss determination in food contamination incidents: an application to milk bans in Hawaii,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 513–520, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  6. UNEP/GEMS, The Contamination of Food, UNEP, Nairobi, Kenya, 1992.
  7. L. Nasreddine and D. Parent-Massin, “Food contamination by metals and pesticides in the European Union. Should we worry?” Toxicology Letters, vol. 127, no. 1–3, pp. 29–41, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. M. H. El-Saeid, “Pesticide residues in canned foods, fruits, and vegetables: the application of Supercritical Fluid Extraction and chromatographic techniques in the analysis,” The Scientific World Journal, vol. 3, pp. 1314–1326, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  9. EL-Saeid H. M. and H. Khan, “Analysis of pesticides in food samples by supercritical fluid chromatography,” in Handbook of Pesticides, chapter 5, pp. 93–113, Taylor & Francis; CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla, USA, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  10. M. T. Selim, M. H. EL-Saeid, and I. M. Al-Dossari, “Multi-residues analysis of pesticides using gas chromatography mass spectrometry: I- leafy vegetables,” Research Journal of Environmental Sciences, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 248–258. View at: Google Scholar
  11. AOAC, “Pesticide and industrial chemical residues,” in Official Methods of Analysis of Association of Official Analytical Chemists, P. E. Corneliussen, Ed., chapter 10, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  12. S. M. Dogheim, E. M. M. Ashraf, S. A. G. Alla, M. A. Khorshid, and S. M. Fahmy, “Pesticides and heavy metals levels in Egyptian leafy vegetables and some aromatic medicinal plants,” Food Additives and Contaminants, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 323–330, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. P. Amoah, P. Drechsel, R. C. Abaidoo, and W. J. Ntow, “Pesticide and pathogen contamination of vegetables in Ghana's urban markets,” Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. R. M. González-Rodríguez, R. Rial-Otero, B. Cancho-Grande, and J. Simal-Gándara, “Determination of 23 pesticide residues in leafy vegetables using gas chromatography-ion trap mass spectrometry and analyte protectants,” Journal of Chromatography A, vol. 1196-1197, no. 1-2, pp. 100–109, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. L. J. Qu, H. Zhang, J. H. Zhu, G. S. Yang, and H. Y. Aboul-Enein, “Rapid determination of organophosphorus pesticides in leeks by GC-TQMS,” Food Chemistry, vol. 122, no. 1, pp. 327–332, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. K. A. Osman, A. M. Al-Humaid, S. M. Al-Rehiayani, and K. N. Al-Redhaiman, “Monitoring of pesticidesresidues in vegetables marketed in Al-Qassim region, Saudi Arabia,” Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, vol. 73, no. 6, pp. 1433–1439, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. R. Rial-Otero, M. Arias-Estévez, E. López-Periago, B. Cancho-Grande, and J. Simal-Gándara, “Variation in concentrations of the fungicides tebuconazole and dichlofluanid following successive applications to greenhouse-grown lettuces,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 53, no. 11, pp. 4471–4475, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. Z. H. Zidan, K. A. Mohamed, and A. E. Bayoumi, “Market basket monitoring of pesticides residues on vegetables and fruits kalubia governorate, Egypt,” Annals of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 743–756, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  19. P. Cabras and E. Conte, “Pesticide residues in grapes and wine in Italy,” Food Additives and Contaminants, vol. 18, no. 10, pp. 880–885, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  20. M. E. Poulsen and J. H. Andersen, “Results from the monitoring of pesticide residues in fruit and vegetables on the Danish market, 2000-2001,” Food Additives and Contaminants, vol. 20, no. 8, pp. 742–757, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. A. B. Gebara, C. H. P. Ciscato, M. D. S. Ferreira, and S. H. Monteiro, “Pesticide residues in vegetables and fruits monitored in São Paulo City, Brazil, 1994–2001,” Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 163–169, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2013 M. H. EL-Saeid and M. T. Selim. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views8011
Downloads6346
Citations

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted research articles as well as case reports and case series related to COVID-19. Review articles are excluded from this waiver policy. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.