Journal of Chemistry

Journal of Chemistry / 2014 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2014 |Article ID 281063 | 8 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/281063

Modeling and Investigation of the Swelling Kinetics of Acrylamide-Sodium Acrylate Hydrogel

Academic Editor: Nurettin Sahiner
Received17 May 2014
Accepted09 Jul 2014
Published13 Aug 2014

Abstract

The acrylamide-sodium acrylate hydrogel was synthesized by free radical polymerization of the method of solution polymerization. Dynamic swelling tests were conducted at 25, 40, and 60°C temperatures, in order to investigate the swelling properties of the synthesized hydrogel. The results have shown that swelling content and swelling rate of the hydrogel increase with increasing the swelling water temperature. The diffusivity values changed from to  m2 s−1 over the temperature range. The activation energies were found as 3.56, 3.71, and 3.86 kJ mol−1 at 25, 40, and 60°C, respectively. The experimental drying curves obtained were fitted to a three different models, namely, Peleg’s, first-order absorption kinetic, and exponential association equation models. All the models applied provided a good agreement with the experimental data with high values of the coefficient of determination (), the least values of the reduced chi-square (), and root mean square error (RMSE). Comparing the determination of coefficient, reduced chi-square, and root mean square error values of three models, it was concluded that the exponential association equation model represents swelling characteristics better than the others.

1. Introduction

Hydrogels are rigid, hydrophilic macromolecules which can absorb minimum 20% water of their weight. Hydrogels are known as hydrophilic network structured polymers having hydrophilic functional groups such as hydroxyl, carboxylic acid, and amines. Hydrogels can swell within a period of time in the appropriate solvents. This type of cross-linked polymer swollen state hydrogels is called “gel.” Due to their hydrophilic properties hydrogels can absorb significant amounts of water and are characterized as their nonsolubility properties. They can swell to an equilibrium value without losing its shape [1, 2].

Due to the mentioned properties of hydrogels a very wide range of application areas are present, such as high swelling capacity and lack of toxicity and biocompatibility; these hydrogels are used for many applications including disposable diapers, absorbent pads, controlled release fertilizers in agricultural areas, water blocking tapes, feminine napkins, separation processes, controlled drug delivery systems, space technology, and extraction of precious metals [37].

The pH and temperature-sensitive hydrogels are being used for various applications including controlled drug delivery system and immobilized enzyme systems. According to the literature, swelling and deswelling behavior of the gels were affected by the temperature, solvent composition, electric field, ionic strength, and pH [811].

Heat-swellable hydrogels can be synthesized by using hydrophilic monomers such as AAm, AA, and MAA. Besides thermal contractible hydrogels can be synthesized by using N-methylacrylamide and N,N-dimethylacrylamide monomers [12].

In temperature-sensitive hydrogels at least one of the components forming the polymer system in the solvent medium (usually water) must have a temperature-dependent solubility. In order to obtain a temperature-sensitive hydrogel showing a marked change in the degree of swelling in water, the components must be insoluble below or above a certain temperature. This volume change observed in the temperature of the polymer chain components of the hydrogel is reversible depending on the degree of ionization. Temperature sensitive hydrogels exhibit a “lower critical solution temperature” (LCST) behavior. Below the LCST, these hydrogels are swollen in water. As the temperature is increased above LCST, it undergoes abrupt changes in volume and shrinks quickly [13, 14].

In all the above applications, the amount of water absorption and retention properties is most important. High swelling rate is an important property of hydrogels. They mainly need several hours to reach maximum absorption capacity. The slow swelling of dried hydrogels is due to the slow diffusion of water into the glassy matrix of the dried hydrogels [1517]. Poly(acrylamide) (PAAm) is an important and hydrophilic polymer for preparation of hydrogels [18]. For this reason, in recent years by researchers, several studies were conducted in order to modify the chemical and physical properties of P(AAM). In the preparation of acrylamide-based hydrogels, there are a number of studies containing sodium acrylate, crotonic acid, maleic acid, and so forth used as hydrophilic monomers [19, 20].

The kinetics of swelling and shrinking of gels is theoretically generalized and experimentally studied. A new relation, in addition to the differential equation developed by Tanaka et al., is formulated to solve the kinetics of gels having arbitrary shape. Using new theory, they provided explicit solutions for long cylinder and large disk gels [21, 22].

In the literature Tanaka and Filmore [21] constructed a kinetic model of the absorbent gels swelling. After this study Li and Tanaka [22] added new approaches about the swelling and shrinking of gels which were then implemented by many researchers [23, 24].

In this study, the acrylamide-sodium acrylate hydrogel was synthesized. The swelling characteristics (swelling content, swelling rate, diffusion of water, and activation energy) of hydrogels were investigated based on the swelling values obtained at different temperatures. In the literature, several researches and models were conducted about the absorbent gels swelling kinetics. As an alternative to these models, three different models, which were never used in this study field, are used for the swelling characteristics. These mentioned models are Peleg, exponential association equation model, and first-order absorption kinetic model. Using these models, best fitted model for the swelling kinetics was determined from the experimental data.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Acrylamide (AAm) was purchased from Merck, Schuchardt, Germany, and used as a monomer. The N,N-methylenebisacrylamide (MBA, Fluka, analytical grade) was used as cross-linking agent. The redox initiator system that comprised ammonium per sulfate initiator (APS, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany, analytical grade) and the activator N,N,N,N-tetramethylethylenediamine (TMEDA) were supplied by Merck (Schuchardt, analytical grade). Methanol (MeOH, BDH, commercial grade) was used as a dehydrating agent against the water inside the gel. Sodium acrylate (C3H3NaO2) was synthesized in the laboratory. In the experiments, a digital balance of model BB3000 Metler-Toledo (Switzerland), a vacuum oven of model BINDER (Tuttlingen, Germany), and Heidolph MR Hei-Standart (Germany) magnetic stirrer with heater were used.

2.2. Preparation of the Sodium Acrylate

Sodium hydroxide (0.5 moles of NaOH) solution was prepared using distilled water. Then the solution was taken in a conical flask in dry ether and titrated with 0.1 mole of acrylic acid (C3H4O2). After the titration process a white solid was separated out, filtered under a vacuum pump, and dried in a vacuum desiccator. The formation scheme of the sodium acrylate is shown as follows [25]:

2.3. Synthesis of Cross-linked (AAm/SA) Hydrogel

In this study, cross-linked acrylamide-sodium acrylate hydrogel was synthesized by free radical solution polymerization of AAm monomer in aqueous solution. A series of hydrogels were prepared by the following procedure.

MBA were used for cross-linkers in the hydrogel synthesis. For the synthesis of AAm/SA hydrogel, after many preexperiments also from the study of Ismail et al. [26], the synthesis procedure was determined. According to the procedure, 1 g of AAm monomer and 80 mg SA were dissolved in 8 mL distilled water; then 0.0777 mmol of MBA was added, which is 1% of the monomer. 1 mL/0.219 mmol APS was added from the 5 g/100 mL APS solution and 1 mL/0.086 mmol TMEDA was added from the 1% TMEDA solution. The prepared solution was poured into a 3-mm-diameter glass tube and held for the gelling process with nitrogen medium.

Synthesized hydrogel was removed from the glass tube and put into distilled water for the washing process. After the washing process, the hydrogel was dried firstly at room temperature and then in the vacuum oven at a temperature of 40°C.

The formation scheme of the hydrogel is given in Figure 1.

2.4. Swelling Content

The quantitative figures of swelling content were calculated as follows: where is the swelling content (g/g d.b), is weight of the swollen hydrogel at time , and is the weight of the original dry hydrogel.

2.5. Swelling Rate

Change in swelling content per unit of time in hydrogels is called “swelling rate” of the hydrogel and is calculated using where is the swelling content at any time (g/g d.b.) and represents the swelling content based on the dry content at “.”

2.6. Diffusion of Water

The most basic law of Fick’s is used for the explanation of swelling kinetics and diffusion of the polymeric structures. Swelling kinetics of the polymers can be given by Peppas et al. [27, 28]: where “” represents the swelling fraction, “” is the equilibrium swelling content of hydrogel, “” is the diffusion exponential of the solvent, and is the constant that changes according to the gels network structure.

In order to identify the type of the diffusion, the parameter of “” must be known. Diffusion exponential of “” can be estimated from the slope of a line obtained from lnF-lnt graph data of the region where the swelling has not yet reach the equilibrium only 60% of the solvent mass enters in the structure of gels.

Another important parameter for the examination of the swelling kinetics is the coefficient of diffusion. For the cylindrical type of structures the coefficient of “” can be found by the equation obtained from the arrangement of Fick’s II law and given as [29] where “” represents the coefficient of diffusion as “m2 s−1” and “” represents the swollen gels radius as “m.”

2.7. Activation Energy

The dependence of the diffusivity coefficient on temperature is often given by an Arrhenius type equation [30]: where is the preexponential factor of Arrhenius equation (m2 s−1), is the activation energy (kJ mol−1), is temperature of water (K−1), and is the universal gas constant of 8.314 × 10−3 (kJ mol−1 K−1).

2.8. Mathematical Modeling of Absorption Kinetics

In this study, the methods that are developed from different researchers, Peleg’s model (7), first-order absorption kinetic model (8), and the exponential association equation (9), were used [3133].

Peleg proposed a two-parameter model to describe water absorption by grains [31]: where is the swelling content at (g/g d.b.), is the swelling content at any time (g/g d.b.), is the swelling time (s), is the kinetic constant of the model (h(g d.b.)/g), and is a characteristic constant of the model (g d.b.)/g). In (7), “±” becomes “+” if the process is absorption or adsorption and “−” if the process is drying or desorption.

In the first-order absorption kinetic model, the equation used is of the following form [34, 35]: where is the swelling kinetic constant (h−1). Consider where is the kinetic constant (h−1).

2.9. Statistical Analysis

The statistical analysis of experimental data was determined using Statistica 6.0 software (Statsoft Inc., Tulsa, OK), which is based on the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm. The three criteria (, , and RMSE) of statistical analysis have been used to evaluate the adjustment of the experimental data to the different models. and RMSE parameters can be calculated as where and are the experimental and predicted dimensionless SR (swelling rate), respectively, is the number of data values, and is the number of constants of the models. The best model describing the swelling characteristics of hydrogels was chosen as the one with the highest and the least and RMSE [36].

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Swelling Curves

Swelling is one of the important parameters in the characterization of the cross-linked hydrogels. Swelling tests at the temperatures of 25, 40, and 60°C were conducted using the hydrogel of acrylamide (AAm)/sodium acrylate (SA).

The starting water contents of the hydrogels were determined as 0.0078 g water/g dry hydrogel. One gram of hydrogels on the dry basis was weighed and put inside the beaker with the 100 mL distilled water inside for swelling. Temperatures were controlled with the Heidolph magnetic stirrer and heater with temperature controller unit. The initial time is set and the weights of the hydrogels were weighted after taking the surface moisture at specific time intervals. Then using the weights the swelling kinetics were investigated.

From the results obtained the hydrogel swelling came to equilibrium value at the end of 28 hours. The swelling equilibrium values for the hydrogel were found as 30.19, 47.18, and 74.07 g water/g dry hydrogel for the temperatures of 25, 40, and 60°C, respectively.

The swelling content, (g/g d.b.), was calculated using (2). From these values, the graph was drawn and the swelling isotherms were constructed, shown in Figure 2.

The swelling content of the hydrogels was higher at the first 8 hours so the kinetic studies were conducted at these values. As seen from Figure 2, the hydrogels swelling contents at the three different temperatures are very high at the first 8 hours.

After the 8th hour, the swelling content was gradually increased. Since the kinetic studies were done within the first 8 hours, the other swelling content values were given in the small graph inside the Figure 2.

From Figure 2, the swelling content values of 21.4, 29.9, and 47.6 g water/g dry hydrogel were seen at the different temperatures of 25, 40, and 60°C, respectively.

The hydrogel swelling content increases with increasing temperatures as seen from Figure 2. The swelling value at 60°C is twice as big as the value at 25°C. It is possible to say that the H-bonds inside the hydrogels were broken due to temperature rise and thus increase the amount of swelling. Also the increase in swelling value with increasing temperature of the hydrogel might be caused by the increase in thermal mobility of polymer molecules inside the hydrogels [37].

Uzum et al. [38] synthesized acrylamide (AAm)/(SA) of sodium acrylate hydrogels from two different types of cross-linkers, by changing the sodium acrylate monomer concentration. They investigated the swelling ratio change of the synthesized hydrogels by changing the cross linker types and of sodium acrylate monomer concentrations. They reported that hydrogels swelling ratio is increased with the increasing concentrations of sodium acrylate monomer and cross-linkers.

Mohan et al. [39] synthesized a superabsorbent copolymer acrylamide-sodium methacrylate and concluded that the copolymers swelling ratios are increased by the increasing sodium methacrylate concentration.

Figure 3 shows the hydrogels swelling rate change according to the swelling content. As seen in Figure 3, the swelling rates and swelling content are increased with the increasing temperature. From the experiments that are done in the 60°C temperature, the maximum swelling content is found as 18.93 g water/g dry hydrogel that corresponds to a swelling rate of 8.9 g water/g dry hydrogel h. Simply in the 40°C and 25°C temperature the maximum swelling contents are found as 13.20 and 9.97 g water/g dry hydrogel that correspond to a swelling rate of 5.22 and 5.21 g water/g dry hydrogel h, respectively.

3.2. Calculation of Diffusion Coefficients

Fick’s laws are the common laws used to explain water diffusion into the dried hydrogel and its diffusion type [40].

The mechanisms of water diffusion into the swelled hydrogel were investigated by (4). The plots of versus were obtained through the logarithmic form of (4), and these graphs are given in Figure 4. The values of , and regression coefficients were calculated from the slopes and the intercepts of the plots of against , respectively, and are given in Table 1.


CoefficientsSwelling temperature (°C)
254060

0.9970.9380.981
6.836.936.15
0.9840.9850.997
1.812.072.97

Equation (4) is valid for the first 60% of the fractional uptake. The Fick’s diffusion transport is defined by n and this value is used for determining the diffusion type [41]. Fickian diffusion and Case II transport are defined by values of 0.5 and 1.0, respectively. The calculated swelling exponent values are in between 0.938 and 0.997. These swelling exponent values indicate that the transport of all super absorbent polymers was of non-Fickian character. The values for and varied between 6.15–6.83 and 0.984–0.997 for all the experimental conditions, respectively. Diffusion coefficient is one of the major parameters to determine the swelling characterization of the hydrogel, and it is calculated by using (5). The values of diffusion coefficient determined for the hydrogel are listed in Table 1. As seen in Table 1, the diffusion coefficients increase by increasing temperature. The diffusion coefficient was obtained with the dried hydrogel as 1.81 × 10−7, 2.07 × 10−7, and 2.97 × 10−7 m2 s−1 at 25, 40, and 60°C, respectively.

3.3. Calculation of the Activation Energy

The calculated diffusivities were plotted as a function of the absolute water-swelling temperature (Figure 5). The plot was found to be essentially a straight line in the range of temperatures investigated, indicating Arrhenius dependence. From the intercept of the straight line described by the Arrhenius equation, is calculated as 2.05 × 10−5 m2 s−1. Using (6) the activation energies are found as 3.56, 3.71, and 3.86 kJ mol−1 at 25, 40, and 60°C, respectively.

3.4. Evaluation of the Models

To describe the swelling kinetics of hydrogel on different temperatures (25, 40, and 60°C), three empirical models, namely, Peleg’s, first-order, and exponential association equation, are used, and all of them provided a good agreement with the experimental data. The constants, , , and RMSE values of the models are estimated and given in Table 2.


Peleg’s model
Temperature (°C)RMSE

250.2937120.0078080.98892.487900.63632
400.2434540.0026370.98943.624271.16706
600.1602180.0004090.99882.460380.58306

First-order rehydration kinetic model
Temperature (°C)RMSE

250.04860.98912.443480.58668
400.02880.99413.624231.09429
600.01360.99872.464110.58774

Exponential association model
Temperature (°C)RMSE

250.05060.98942.385880.56817
400.03100.99403.607841.09205
600.01350.99882.460250.58046

As it can be seen from Table 2, the kinetic rate constant and the characteristic constant of the Peleg’s model and the scale parameter ( and ) of first-order and exponential association models are changed inversely proportional to the temperature. In other words, it can also be seen from the models that , , , and values are reduced by the increase in temperature.

The data obtained from the Peleg model showed that the least and values are obtained at 60°C temperature. The and values obtained are found as 0.293712 and 0.007808 at 25°C, 0.243454 and 0.002637 at 40°C, and 0.160218 and 0.000409 at 60°C. Also, Maskan [42] and Solomon [43] have reported that high water absorption capacity is correlated with the low and values.

From the investigation of , , and RMSE, it was seen that the value is almost as “1”; RMSE and are the minimum at the model of exponential association. Also the values given in Table 2 are very close to each other. At the mentioned temperatures the calculated values by the exponential association fit the experimental values at best. The values were calculated as 0.9894, 0.9940, and 0.9988 at the temperatures of 25, 40, and 60°C, respectively.

In Figure 6, the experimental values are compared with the predicted values obtained from the exponential association model for the first 8 hours of hydration.

As seen from Figure 6, the predicted swelling values for the hydrogel based upon the exponential association model are in good agreement with the experimental values.

4. Conclusions

In this study, the acrylamide-sodium acrylate hydrogel was synthesized and the effect of temperature on the swelling kinetics of hydrogel was investigated. The swelling equilibrium values for the hydrogel were found as 30.19, 47.18, and 74.07 g water/g dry hydrogel for the temperatures of 25, 40, and 60°C, respectively. As the temperature increased hydrogels swelling content and swelling rate were also increased.

The physical properties of the hydrogel (LCST and swelling) and thermal properties depend on the properties and amount of the monomers used in the synthesis. Therefore, a hydrogel can be arranged to absorb high water capacities by changing the monomer properties (variation and amount). In this study synthesized hydrogel’s LCST is found as 60°C. At that temperature the water absorption capacity of the hydrogel increases. After the temperature of 60°C hydrogels have shrunk by giving their absorbed water.

The values of calculated diffusion coefficients ranged from 1.81 × 10−7 to 2.97 × 10−7 m2 s−1. The swelling rate and effective diffusivity increase with air temperature increases (consequently swelling content increased), where, in the study of Aktas et al. [24], diffusion constants were found to be in the range of  m2 s−1, which are considerably smaller than our study. The difference between literature values and our study most probably originates from the solvents at which the gels were swelled.

Temperature dependence of the diffusivity coefficients was described by Arrhenius-type relationship. The activation energies are found as 3.56, 3.71, and 3.86 kJ mol−1 at 25, 40, and 60°C, respectively.

In order to determine the water content uptake as a function of swelling time, three different models were examined, and all these models provided a good agreement with the experimental data; however, the exponential association equation model was chosen as the appropriate model to represent the swelling kinetics of hydrogels.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

References

  1. K. Makuuchi, “Critical review of radiation processing of hydrogel and polysaccharide,” Radiation Physics and Chemistry, vol. 79, no. 3, pp. 267–271, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. C. Chang, B. Duan, J. Cai, and L. Zhang, “Superabsorbent hydrogels based on cellulose for smart swelling and controllable delivery,” European Polymer Journal, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 92–100, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. H. Ferfera-Harrar, N. Aiouaz, N. Dairi, and A. S. Hadj-Hamou, “Preparation of chitosan-g-poly(acrylamide)/montmorillonite superabsorbent polymer composites: studies on swelling, thermal, and antibacterial properties,” Journal of Applied Polymer Science, vol. 131, no. 1, p. 14, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. B. Jeong, Y. H. Bae, and S. W. Kim, “Drug release from biodegradable injectable thermosensitive hydrogel of PEG-PLGA-PEG triblock copolymers,” Journal of Controlled Release, vol. 63, no. 1-2, pp. 155–163, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  5. S. K. Bajpai and S. Singh, “Analysis of swelling behavior of poly(methacrylamide-co-methacrylic acid) hydrogels and effect of synthesis conditions on water uptake,” Reactive and Functional Polymers, vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 431–440, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. G. Frutos, A. Prior-Cabanillas, R. París, and I. Quijada-Garrido, “A novel controlled drug delivery system based on pH-responsive hydrogels included in soft gelatin capsules,” Acta Biomaterialia, vol. 6, no. 12, pp. 4650–4656, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. N. R. Gupta, P. P. Ghute, and M. V. Badiger, “Synthesis and characterization of thermo-sensitive graft copolymer of carboxymethyl guar and poly(N-isopropylacrylamide),” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 83, no. 1, pp. 74–80, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. A. K. Bajpai and M. Shrivastava, “Dynamic swelling behavior of polyacrylamide based three component hydrogels,” Journal of Macromolecular Science A: Pure and Applied Chemistry, vol. 37, no. 9, pp. 1069–1088, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. M. Sivanantham and B. V. R. Tata, “Swelling/deswelling of polyacrylamide gels in aqueous NaCl solution: light scattering and macroscopic swelling study,” Pramana, vol. 79, no. 3, pp. 457–469, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. A. Vashist, Y. K. Gupta, and S. Ahmad, “Interpenetrating biopolymer network based hydrogels for an effective drug delivery system,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 87, no. 2, pp. 1433–1439, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. X. F. Sun, Z. Jing, and G. Wang, “Preparation and swelling behaviors of porous hemicellulose-g-polyacrylamide hydrogels,” Journal of Applied Polymer Science, vol. 128, no. 3, pp. 1861–1870, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. M. Bulut, Makrogözenekli poli (akrilamit) hidrojellerinin hazırlanması ve farklı ortamlardaki şişme davranışlarının incelenmesi [M.S. thesis], Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey, 2005.
  13. M. E. Byrne, K. Park, and N. A. Peppas, “Molecular imprinting within hydrogels,” Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 149–161, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. L. E. Bromberg and E. S. Ron, “Temperature-responsive gels and thermogelling polymer matrices for protein and peptide delivery,” Medicine, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 19–24, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  15. J. E. Elliott, M. MacDonald, J. Nie, and C. N. Bowman, “Structure and swelling of poly(acrylic acid) hydrogels: effect of pH, ionic strength, and dilution on the crosslinked polymer structure,” Polymer, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 1503–1510, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. D. Saraydin, E. Karadag, Y. Isikver et al., “The influence of preparation methods on the swelling and network proper-ties of acrylamide hydrogels with crosslinkers,” Journal of Macromolecular Science A, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 421–433, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  17. K. Kabiri, H. Omidian, S. A. Hashemi, and M. J. Zohuriaan-Mehr, “Synthesis of fast-swelling superabsorbent hydrogels: Effect of crosslinker type and concentration on porosity and absorption rate,” European Polymer Journal, vol. 39, no. 7, pp. 1341–1348, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. W. M. Thomas and D. Wei Wang, “Acrylamide polymers,” in Encyclopedia of Polymer Science and Engineering, H. F. Mark and N. M. Bikales, Eds., vol. 1, pp. 169–211, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1964. View at: Google Scholar
  19. E. Karadağ and D. Saraydin, “Swelling studies of super water retainer acrylamide/crotonic acid hydrogels crosslinked by trimethylolpropane triacrylate and 1,4-butanediol dimethacrylate,” Polymer Bulletin, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 299–307, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. E. Karadaǧ, O. B. Üzüm, and D. Saraydin, “Swelling equilibria and dye adsorption studies of chemically crosslinked superabsorbent acrylamide/maleic acid hydrogels,” European Polymer Journal, vol. 38, no. 11, pp. 2133–2141, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. T. Tanaka and D. J. Filmore, “Kinetics of swelling of gels,” The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 70, no. 3, p. 1214, 1979. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. Y. Li and T. Tanaka, “Kinetics of swelling and shrinking of gels,” The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 92, no. 2, p. 1365, 1990. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. D. K. Aktas, G. A. Evingur, and O. Pekcan, “Study on swelling of hydrogels (PAAm) at various temperatures by using fluorescence technique,” Journal of Materials Science, vol. 42, no. 20, pp. 8481–8488, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. D. K. Aktas, G. A. Evingur, and O. Pekcan, “A fluorescence study on swelling of hydrogels (PAAm) at various cross-linker contents,” Advances in Polymer Technology, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 215–223, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. K. M. Raju, M. P. Raju, and Y. M. Mohan, “Synthesis and swelling behavior of superabsorbent polymeric materials,” International Journal of Polymeric Materials and Polymeric Biomaterials, vol. 53, no. 5, pp. 419–429, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. O. Ismail, A. S. Kipcak, and S. Piskin, “Modeling of absorption kinetics of poly(acrylamide) hydrogels crosslinked by EGDMA and PEGDMAs,” Research on Chemical Intermediates, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 907–919, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. N. A. Peppas, P. Bures, W. Leobandung, and H. Ichikawa, “Hydrogels in pharmaceutical formulations,” European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics, vol. 50, pp. 27–46, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. R. Zarzycki, Z. Modrzejewska, and K. Nawrotek, “Drug release from hydrogel matrices,” Ecological Chemistry and Engineering S, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 117–136, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  29. R. Dengre, M. Bajpai, and S. K. Bajpai, “Release of vitamin B12 from poly(N-vinyl-2-pyrrolidone)-crosslinked polyacrylamide hydrogels: a kinetic study,” Journal of Applied Polymer Science, vol. 76, pp. 1706–1714, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  30. M. Böhning, N. Hao, and A. Schönhals, “Correlation of activation energies of gas diffusivity and local matrix mobility in polycarbonate/POSS nanocomposites,” Journal of Polymer Science B: Polymer Physics, vol. 51, no. 22, pp. 1593–1597, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. M. Peleg, “An empirical model for the description of moisture sorption curves,” Journal of Food Science, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 1216–1217, 1988. View at: Google Scholar
  32. D. K. Apar, E. Demirhan, B. Özbek, and G. Dadali, “Rehydration kinetics of microwave-dried okras as affected by drying conditions,” Journal of Food Processing and Preservation, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 618–634, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. M. Noshad, M. Mohebbi, F. Shahidi, and S. A. Mortazavi, “Kinetic modeling of rehydration in air-dried quinces pretreated with osmotic dehydration and ultrasonic,” Journal of Food Processing and Preservation, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 383–392, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. K. G. Kaptso, Y. N. Njintang, A. E. Komnek, J. Hounhouigan, J. Scher, and C. M. F. Mbofung, “Physical properties and rehydration kinetics of two varieties of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) and bambara groundnuts (Voandzeia subterranea) seeds,” Journal of Food Engineering, vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 91–99, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. K. Górnicki, A. Kaleta, R. Winiczenko et al., “Chapter 16: some remarks on modelling of mass transfer kinetics during rehydration of dried fruits and vegetables engineering,” in Mass Transfer—Advances in Sustainable Energy and Environment Oriented Numerical Modeling, H. Nakajima, Ed., 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  36. A. Kaleta and K. Górnicki, “Some remarks on evaluation of drying models of red beet particles,” Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 51, no. 12, pp. 2967–2978, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. D. E. Rodríguez, J. Romero-García, E. Ramírez-Vargas, A. S. Ledezma-Pérez, and E. Arías-Marín, “Synthesis and swelling characteristics of semi-interpenetrating polymer network hydrogels composed of poly(acrylamide) and poly(γ-glutamic acid),” Materials Letters, vol. 60, no. 11, pp. 1390–1393, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. O. B. Uzum, S. Kundakci, H. B. Durukan, and E. Karadag, “Swelling and dye sorption studies of AAm/SA hydrogels crosslinked by glutaraldehyde and divinylbenzene,” Journal of Applied Polymer Science, vol. 105, pp. 2646–2654, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. Y. M. Mohan, P. S. K. Murthy, and K. M. Raju, “Synthesis, characterization and effect of reaction parameters on swelling properties of acrylamide–sodium methacrylate superabsorbent copolymers,” Reactive and Functional Polymers, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 11–26, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. M. T. am Ende and N. A. Peppas, “Transport of ionizable drugs and proteins in crosslinked poly(acrylic acid) and poly(acrylic acid-co-2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) hydrogels. II. Diffusion and release studies,” Journal of Controlled Release, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 47–56, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. N. A. Peppas and L. Brannon-Peppas, “Water diffusion and sorption in amorphous macromolecular systems and foods,” Journal of Food Engineering, vol. 22, no. 1–4, pp. 189–210, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  42. M. Maskan, “Effect of processing on hydration kinetics of three wheat products of the same variety,” Journal of Food Engineering, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 337–341, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. W. K. Solomon, “Hydration kinetics of lupin (Lupinus albus) seeds,” Journal of Food Process Engineering, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 119–130, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2014 Azmi Seyhun Kipcak et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

4593 Views | 1558 Downloads | 12 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at help@hindawi.com to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19.