Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Chemistry
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 858106, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/858106
Research Article

A Comparison of Second-Order Calibration Methods Applied to Excitation-Emission Matrix Fluorescence Data

Hui Chen,1,2 Zan Lin,3 Tong Wu,1 and Chao Tan1,4

1Key Lab of Process Analysis and Control of Sichuan Universities, Yibin University, Yibin, Sichuan 644000, China
2Hospital, Yibin University, Yibin, Sichuan 644000, China
3The First Affiliated Hospital, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China
4Computational Physics Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Yibin University, Yibin 644007, China

Received 28 September 2014; Accepted 1 November 2014; Published 20 November 2014

Academic Editor: Tomokazu Yoshimura

Copyright © 2014 Hui Chen et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. Y.-N. Li, H.-L. Wu, X.-D. Qing et al., “The maintenance of the second-order advantage: second-order calibration of excitation-emission matrix fluorescence for quantitative analysis of herbicide napropamide in various environmental samples,” Talanta, vol. 85, no. 1, pp. 325–332, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. G. M. Escandar, A. C. Olivieri, N. M. Faber, H. C. Goicoechea, A. Muñoz de la Peña, and R. J. Poppi, “Second- and third-order multivariate calibration: data, algorithms and applications,” Trends in Analytical Chemistry, vol. 26, no. 7, pp. 752–765, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. K. R. Murphy, C. A. Stedmon, D. Graeber, and R. Bro, “Fluorescence spectroscopy and multi-way techniques. PARAFAC,” Analytical Methods, vol. 5, no. 23, pp. 6557–6566, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. X. Zhang and R. Tauler, “Application of multivariate curve resolution alternating least squares (MCR-ALS) to remote sensing hyperspectral imaging,” Analytica Chimica Acta, vol. 762, pp. 25–38, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. V. Gómez and M. P. Callao, “Analytical applications of second-order calibration methods,” Analytica Chimica Acta, vol. 627, no. 2, pp. 169–183, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. M. C. Ortiz, L. A. Sarabia, M. S. Sánchez, and D. Giménez, “Identification and quantification of ciprofloxacin in urine through excitation-emission fluorescence and three-way PARAFAC calibration,” Analytica Chimica Acta, vol. 642, no. 1-2, pp. 193–205, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. H. A. L. Kiers and A. K. Smilde, “Some theoretical results on second-order calibration methods for data with and without rank overlap,” Journal of Chemometrics, vol. 9, pp. 179–195, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  8. Y.-J. Yu, H.-L. Wu, J.-F. Nie et al., “A comparison of several trilinear second-order calibration algorithms,” Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, vol. 106, no. 1, pp. 93–107, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. S. Li, J. C. Hamilton, and P. J. Gemperline, “Generalized rank annihilation method using similarity transformations,” Analytical Chemistry, vol. 64, no. 6, pp. 599–607, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. E. Sanchez and B. R. Kowalski, “Tensorial resolution: a direct trilinear decomposition,” Journal of Chemometrics, vol. 4, pp. 29–45, 1990. View at Google Scholar
  11. R. A. Harshman, UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics, vol. 1, 1970.
  12. R. Bro, “PARAFAC. Tutorial and applications,” Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 149–171, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. H.-L. Wu, M. Shibukawa, and K. Oguma, “An alternating trilinear decomposition algorithm with application to calibration of HPLC-DAD for simultaneous determination of overlapped chlorinated aromatic hydrocarbons,” Journal of Chemometrics, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–26, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. A.-L. Xia, H.-L. Wu, D.-M. Fang, Y.-J. Ding, L.-Q. Hu, and R.-Q. Yu, “Alternating penalty trilinear decomposition algorithm for second-order calibration with application to interference-free analysis of excitation-emission matrix fluorescence data,” Journal of Chemometrics, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 65–76, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. Z.-P. Chen, H.-L. Wu, J.-H. Jiang, Y. Li, and R.-Q. Yu, “A novel trilinear decomposition algorithm for second-order linear calibration,” Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 75–86, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. A. de Juan and R. Tauler, “Multivariate Curve Resolution (MCR) from 2000: progress in concepts and applications,” Critical Reviews in Analytical Chemistry, vol. 36, no. 3-4, pp. 163–176, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. A. C. Olivieri, “On a versatile second-order multivariate calibration method based on partial least-squares and residual bilinearization: second-order advantage and precision properties,” Journal of Chemometrics, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 253–265, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. R. Bro, “Multiway calibration. Multilinear PLS,” Journal of Chemometrics, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 47–61, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. R. Bro and H. A. L. Kiers, “A new efficient method for determining the number of components in PARAFAC models,” Journal of Chemometrics, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 274–286, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus