Journal of Chemistry

Journal of Chemistry / 2014 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2014 |Article ID 941074 | 6 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/941074

Evaluation of Benzophenone-N-ethyl Morpholine Ethers as Antibacterial and Antifungal Activities

Academic Editor: Filomena Conforti
Received30 May 2013
Accepted25 Nov 2013
Published28 Jan 2014

Abstract

Microorganisms are closely associated with the health and welfare of human beings. Whereas some microorganisms are beneficial, others are detrimental. Bacterial infections often produce inflammation and pains and in some instances, infections result in high mortality. Any subtle change in the drug molecule, which may not be detected by chemical methods, can be revealed by a change in the antimicrobial activity and hence microbiological assays are very useful. A series of substituted hydroxy benzophenones and benzophenone-N-ethyl morpholine ethers were screened for their antibacterial and antifungal activities. Antibacterial activity against S. aureus, E. aerogenes, M. luteus, K. pneumonia, and S. typhimurium, S. paratyphi-B and P. vulgaris bacterial strains and antifungal activity against C. albicans, B. cinerea, M. pachydermatis, C. krusei fungal strains were carried out. The bioassays indicated that most of the synthesized compounds showed potential antibacterial and antifungal agents.

1. Introduction

Bacteria are extremely pathogenic causing infection and widespread use of commercially available antibiotics led to the developed resistance or ability to produce substance which block the action of antibiotics or change their target and produce undesirable side effects [1]. Although, a number of different classes of antibacterial and antifungal agents have been discovered during the last two decades, the use is limited due to development of microbial resistance [2]. In recent decades, problems of multidrug-resistant microorganisms have reached an alarming level in many countries around the world. Resistance to a number of antimicrobial agents (b-lactam antibiotics, macrolides, quinolones, and vancomycin) among variety of clinically significant species of bacteria is becoming increasingly important global problem. Also a number of recent clinical reports describe the increasing occurrence of methicillin the resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) which is the most disturbing cause of nosocomial infections in developed countries [3, 4]. Infections caused by these microorganisms pose a serious challenge to the medicinal community and the need for an effective therapy has led to search for novel antimicrobial agents.

Phenolic compounds are commonly known for their antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and antimicrobial activities [5]. During the past years extensive evidences have been accumulated to establish the efficiency of benzophenone analogues as antimicrobial agent [610]. Benzophenone analogue (garcinol) has been isolated from the stem bark of Garcinia huillensis grown in Zaire and used in central-African traditional medicine and also extracts obtained from Rheedia brasiliensis fruit (bacupari) containing bioactive compound of benzophenone analogous which showed activity against Streptococcus mutans at low concentrations (1.25–2.5 μg/mL). Also prenylated benzophenone isolated from roots of Cudrania cochinchinensis (Moraceae) was tested for its antimicrobial activities against vancomycin-resistant enterococci. This has exhibited chemotherapeutical activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative cocci, mycobacteria, and fungi [1113]. Recently Selvi et al. have shown antifungal activity of benzophenone analogues, at its lower concentration [14]. Besides chloro substituted benzophenones have exhibited more antifungal activity [15].

The pharmacological effect of morpholine compounds in different biological fields is of great importance for researchers and investigators. Morpholine derivative plays an important role in the treatment of several diseases. Heterocyclic ring systems having morpholine nucleus have aroused great interest in recent years due to their variety of biological activities [16]. Morpholine derivatives were reported to possess antimicrobial activity [17, 18] and inflammatory activities in albino rats [19]. Morpholine derivatives find their wide spectrum of antimicrobial activity and exhibit anthelmintic, bactericidal, and insecticidal activity [20, 21].

Another important pharmacophore group of morpholine nucleus incorporated in a wide variety of therapeutically important drugs, one of which is linezolid (PNU-10766, commercially available antimicrobial drug), possess 4-(2-fluorophenyl) morpholine moiety [22, 23]. In addition, series of benzophenone derivatives, some of which contained a morpholine group possess good antifungal and antibacterial activities [24].

In continuation of our studies for the synthesized compound [19], we report herein antibacterial and antifungal activities of benzophenone-N-ethyl morpholine ethers.

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Chemistry: Materials and Methods

IR spectra were recorded in Nujol on FT-IR Shimadz 8300 spectrophotometer, 1H NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker 300 MHz NMR spectrophotometer in CDCl3, and chemical shift was recorded in parts per million down field from tetramethylsilane. Mass spectra were obtained with a VG70-70H spectrophotometer and important fragments are given with the relative intensities in the brackets. Elemental analysis results are within 0.4% of the calculated value.

2.2. General Procedure for the Synthesis of Substituted Benzophenone-N-ethyl Morpholine Ethers (5a–j)

Substituted 2-methylphenyl benzoates (3a–j) were synthesized by stirring 2-methyl phenol (1, 1 equivalent) with corresponding benzoyl chlorides (2a–j, 1 equivalent) for 30 minutes in alkaline medium using 10% sodium hydroxide solution with excellent yield. Substituted hydroxyl benzophenones (4a–j) were synthesized by refluxing a mixture of 3a–j (1 equivalent) and anhydrous aluminum chloride (1.5 equivalents) for 20 minutes. Condensation of 4a–j (1 equivalent) with 4-(2-chloroethyl) morpholine hydrochloride (1 equivalent) for 3 hours in presence of anhydrous potassium carbonate (1.5 equivalents) and dimethyl sulphoxide furnished substituted benzophenone-N-ethyl morpholine ethers (5a–j) with good yield. The compounds 5a-j were characterized by IR, 1H NMR, and mass spectrophotometer [19].

2.3. Biology: Materials and Methods for the Antimicrobial Activity

Streptomycin and ciprofloxacin (Sigma) were used as positive controls against bacteria. Fluconazole and ketoconazole (Himedia, Mumbai) were used as positive controls against fungi.

2.3.1. Tested Microbes

The following gram-positive bacteria were used for the experiments; S. aureus, S. aureus (MRSA), E. aerogenes, and M. luteus. The gram-negative bacteria included K. pneumoniae, S. typhimurium, S. paratyphi-B, and P. vulgaris. In addition, fungi C. albicans, B. cinerea, M. pachydermatis, and C. krusei were also used for the experiments. All cultures were obtained from the Department of Microbiology, Manasagangotri, Mysore.

2.3.2. Preparation of Inoculums

Bacterial inoculums were prepared by growing cells in Mueller Hinton Broth (MHA) (Himedia) for 24 h at 37°C. These cell suspensions were diluted with sterile MHB to provide initial cell counts of about 104 CFU/mL. The filamentous fungi were grown on sabouraud dextrose agar (SDA) slants at 28°C for 10 days and the spores were collected using sterile doubled distilled water and homogenized.

2.3.3. Disc Diffusion Assay

Antibacterial activity was carried out using a disc diffusion method [25]. Petri plates were prepared with 20 mL of sterile Mueller Hinton Agar (MHA) (Himedia, Mumbai). The test cultures were swabbed on the top of the solidified media and allowed to dry for 10 mins. The tests were conducted at 1000 µg/disc. The loaded discs were placed on the surface of the medium and left for 30 min at room temperature for compound diffusion. Negative control was prepared using respective solvent. Streptomycin (10 µg/disc) was used as positive control. The plates were incubated for 24 h at 37°C for bacteria and 48 h at 27°C for fungi. Zone of inhibition was recorded in millimeters and the experiment was repeated twice.

2.3.4. Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC)

Minimum inhibitory concentration studies of synthesized compounds were performed according to the standard reference method for bacteria [26] and filamentous fungi [27]. Required concentrations (1000 µg/mL, 500 µg/mL, 250 µg/mL, 125 µg/mL, 62.5 µg/mL, 31.25 µg/mL, and 15.62 µg/mL) of the compound were dissolved in DMSO (2%) and diluted to give serial two-fold dilutions that were added to each medium in 96 well plates. An inoculum of 100 mL from each well was inoculated. The antifungal agent’s ketoconazole, fluconazole for fungi and streptomycin, and ciprofloxacin for bacteria were included in the assays as positive controls. For fungi, the plates were incubated for 48–72 h at 28°C and for bacteria the plates were incubated for 24 h at 37°C. The MIC for fungi was defined as the lowest extract concentration, showing no visible fungal growth after incubation time. 5 ml of tested broth was placed on the sterile MHA plates for bacteria and incubated at respective temperatures. The MIC for bacteria was determined as the lowest concentration of the compound inhibiting the visual growth of the test cultures on the agar plate.

3. Result and Discussion

The reaction sequence for the title compounds is outlined in Scheme 1. Compounds 5a–j have been prepared as previously reported by our group [19]. The antimicrobial activities of synthesized compounds were screened against eight bacteria and four fungi using in vitro disc diffusion method. The results revealed that most of the synthesized compounds exhibited antimicrobial activities against Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), Enterobacter aerogenes, Micrococcus luteus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Salmonella typhimurium, Salmonella paratyphi-B, Proteus vulgaris, Candida albicans, Botyritis cinerea, Malassesia pachydermatis, and Candida krusei organisms. The results are summarized in Tables 1 and 2. Compounds 5e, 5f, 5g, 5h, and 5i showed good activity more than standard drug against S. aureus. Compound 5e with chlorogroup at meta position in phenyl ring showed good activity against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria among all synthesized compounds compared with the standard. Among compounds 5b–d in which methyl group is substituted at para, ortho, and meta position, respectively, compound 5d showed good activity against S. aureus and S. typhimurium Compound 5e showed significant antifungal activity against B. cinerea and C. krusei and compound 5h with fluoro group at para position showed more activity against B. cinerea. Similarly compound 5g with bromo group at para position and 5i with two chloro groups at ortho and para position showed more activity against C. krusei compared to standard drug. In contrast, compounds 5a with methoxy group, 5b–d with methyl group, and 5j without any substituent exhibited lowest activity and this can be attributed to the electron releasing effect. The MIC values of active compounds 5c–i against bacteria and fungi are given in Tables 3 and 4. Significant MIC values were observed against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. Compounds 5d–h showed good activity against S. aureus. In comparison to compound 5i, in compounds 5d and 5e, the potency against S. aureus has been increased by onefold. Interestingly the presence of halo group in phenyl ring in compounds 5g and 5h increased the potency against S. aureus by twofold. In comparison to compound 5i in compound 5e the potency is increased by twofold against bacteria S. paratyphi-B, threefold by S. aureus (MRSA) and S. typhimurium, fourfold by M. luteus, K. pneumonia, and fivefold by E. aerogens. Besides, the potency of compound 5e is increased by twofold against fungi B. cinerea, three fold by C. krusei and fourfold by C. albicans compared to compound 5i. In general, compound 5e showed better activity than standard drugs for most of the tested bacteria and fungi.


CompoundsZone of inhibition in mm
Gram-positive bacteriaGram-negative bacteria
S. aureus S. aureus  (MRSA)E. aerogenls M. luteus K. pneumonia S. typhimurium S. Paratyphi-B P. vulgaris

5a109911911812
5b1311101191089
5c1512141312151311
5d161214121017813
5e2018222425262928
5f241419171524918
5g2515151914211317
5h231218191221914
5i199121514171112
5j118912111089
Streptomycin1620212421221723


CompoundsZone of inhibition in mm
C. albicans B. cinerea M. pachydermatis C. krusei

5a891011
5b98107
5c14101313
5d1091514
5e18162123
5f14101116
5g9121319
5h13151114
5i12101320
5j1091215
Ketoconazole21112517


CompoundsMinimum inhibitory concentration ( g/ mL)
Gram-positive bacteriaGram-negative bacteria
S. aureus S. aureus  (MRSA)E. aerogenes M. luteus K. pneumoniae S. typhimurium S. Paratyphi-B P. vulgaris

5c25050025025050062.5500500
5d31.2512512563.563.5250125250
5e31.2562.515.6215.6215.6215.62125<15.62
5f15.6212.562.512.525015.62500125
5g15.6225025032.525031.2550062.5
5h15.6225062.562.555031.25500125
5i62.5500500250250125500500
Streptomycin6.25>100256.256.2530ni6.25
Ciprofloxacin<0.78>100<0.78>100<0.78>1006.25<0.78

ni: no inhibition.

CompoundsMinimum inhibitory concentration ( g/mL)
C. albicans B. cinerea M. pachydermatis C. krusei

5c125500250125
5d250250125125
5e31.512525031.5
5f250250500250
5g500500250250
5h500250500250
5i500500250250
Fluconazole>100ni12.512.5
Ketoconazole25251515

ni: no inhibition.
941074.sch.001

4. Conclusion

In conclusion, this study is considered with respect to synthesis of morpholine analogues 5a–j as new budding antimicrobials. These novel compounds were evaluated for their activities against eight bacteria and four fungi. Compound 5e with chloro group at meta position in phenyl ring was found to be more than 1.6 times active against S. aureus (MRSA) bacteria than streptomycin and ciprofloxacin and moreover more than 6.4 times active against M. luteus and S. typhimurium bacteria than ciprofloxacin. Compound 5e was also found to be more than 3.2 times active against C. albicans fungi than fluconazole. In contrast, compounds 5a with methoxy group and 5b–d with methyl group exhibited lowest activity and this can be attributed to the electron releasing effect. These results showed that synthesized compound 5e might be a potential antibacterial and antifungal agent.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests with respect to the content of the paper.

Acknowledgments

Lakshmi Ranganatha V. acknowledges the financial support provided by the Department of Science and Technology, New Delhi, under INSPIRE-Fellowship scheme [IF110555]. Shaukath Ara Khanum gratefully acknowledges financial support provided by the UGC, New Delhi, under the Major Research Project Scheme. And all authors are thankful to the principal, Yuvaraja’s College, University of Mysore, Mysore, for his support and encouragement throughout the execution of this work.

References

  1. K. Manish Gautam, M. Gangwar, G. Nath, V. Chandana Rao, and K. Raj Goel, “In-vitro antibacterial activity on human pathogens and total phenolic, flavonoid contents of Murraya paniculata Linn. leaves.,” Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Biomedicine, vol. 2, pp. S1660–S1663, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  2. S. G. Shingade and S. B. Bari, “Synthesis and antimicrobial screening of 4-thiazolidinone and 2-azetidinone derivatives of piperazine,” Medicinal Chemistry Research, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 699–706, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. J. S. Francis, M. C. Doherty, U. Lopatin et al., “Severe community-onset pneumonia in healthy adults caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus carrying the Panton-Valentine leukocidin genes,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 100–107, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. D. Kruszewska, H.-G. Sahl, G. Bierbaum, U. Pag, S. O. Hynes, and Å. Ljungh, “Mersacidin eradicates methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in a mouse rhinitis model,” Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 648–653, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. A. Klancnik S Piskernik, B. Jersek, and S. S. Mozina, “Evaluation of diffusion and dilution methods to determine the antibacterial activity of plant extracts,” Journal of Microbiological Methods, vol. 81, pp. 121–126, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. S. A. Khanum, S. Shashikanth, S. Umesha, and R. Kavitha, “Synthesis and antimicrobial study of novel heterocyclic compounds from hydroxybenzophenones,” European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 40, no. 11, pp. 1156–1162, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. B. Trusheva, M. Popova, H. Naydenski, I. Tsvetkova, J. G. Rodriguez, and V. Bankova, “New polyisoprenylated benzophenones from Venezuelan propolis,” Fitoterapia, vol. 75, no. 7-8, pp. 683–689, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. J. Lokvam, J. F. Braddock, P. B. Reichardt, and T. P. Clausen, “Two polyisoprenylated benzophenones from the trunk latex of Clusia grandiflora (Clusiaceae),” Phytochemistry, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 29–34, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. J. Curtze, C. H. G. Rudolph, L. Schroder et al., Chemical Abstracts, vol. 129, 108898, 1998.
  10. L. Ke, Z. Wannian, Z. Wu, and W. Xiaoyan, Chemical Abstracts, vol. 136, 167122, 2002.
  11. P. Bakana, M. Claeys, J. Totte et al., “Structure and chemotherapeutical activity of a polyisoprenylated benzophenone from the stem bark of Garcinia huillensis,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 75–84, 1987. View at: Google Scholar
  12. L. S. B. Almeida, R. M. Murata, R. Yatsuda et al., “Antimicrobial activity of Rheedia brasiliensis and 7-epiclusianone against Streptococcus mutans,” Phytomedicine, vol. 15, no. 10, pp. 886–891, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. T. Fukai, Y. Oku, A.-J. Hou, M. Yonekawa, and S. Terada, “Antimicrobial activity of isoprenoid-substituted xanthones from Cudrania cochinchinensis against vancomycin-resistant enterococci,” Phytomedicine, vol. 12, no. 6-7, pp. 510–513, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. A. T. Selvi, G. S. Joseph, and G. K. Jayaprakasha, “Inhibition of growth and aflatoxin production in Aspergillus flavus by Garcinia indica extract and its antioxidant activity,” Food Microbiology, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 455–460, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. T. Grote, A. Gypser, and J. Rheinheimer, Chemical Abstracts, vol. 137, 232443, 2002.
  16. R. M. Acheson, An Introduction to the Chemistry of Heterocyclic Compound, vol. 348, John Wiley & Sons, 2nd edition, 1976.
  17. R. S. Varma, R. Prakash, M. M. Khan, and A. Ali, Indian Drugs, vol. 23, pp. 345–349, 1986.
  18. J. B. Hester, E. Nidy, G. Eldon, S. C. Perricone, and T. J. Poel, “Preparation of thiocarboxyl Oxazolidines as antibacterial agents,” PCT Appl W00144188, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  19. S. A. Khanum, B. A. Begum, V. Girish, and N. F. Khanum, “Synthesis and evaluation of benzophenone-n-ethyl morpholine ethers as anti-inflammatory agents,” International Journal of Biomedical Science, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 60–65, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  20. T. A. Naik and K. H. Chikalia, “Studies on synthesis of pyrimidine derivatives and their pharmacological evaluation,” E-Journal of Chemistry, vol. 4, pp. 60–66, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. S. Pattnaik, V. R. Subramanyam, and C. Kole, “Antibacterial and antifungal activity of ten essential oils in vitro,” Microbios, vol. 86, no. 349, pp. 237–246, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  22. H. Bektas, N. Karaali, D. Sahin, A. Demirbas, S. A. Karaoglu, and N. Demirbas, “Synthesis and antimicrobial activities of some new 1,2,4-triazole derivatives,” Molecules, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 2427–2438, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. H. Bektas, A. Demirbas, N. Demirbas, and S. Alpay Karaoglu, “Synthesis and biological activity studies of new hybrid molecules containing tryptamine moiety,” Medicinal Chemistry Research, vol. 21, pp. 212–223, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. L. Sun, J. Wu, M. Luo et al., “Diversity oriented design of various benzophenone derivatives and their in vitro antifungal and antibacterial activities,” Molecules, vol. 16, no. 11, pp. 9739–9754, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. P. R. Murray, E. J. Baron, M. A. Pfaller, F. C. Tenover, and R. H. Yolke, Manual of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 6, ASM, 1995.
  26. V. Duraipandiyan and S. Ignacimuthu, “Antibacterial and antifungal activity of Flindersine isolated from the traditional medicinal plant, Toddalia asiatica (L.) Lam,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 123, no. 3, pp. 494–498, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. “Dilution Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Filamentous Fungi, Approved Standard 2nd Edition CLSI document M38-A2,” Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Pennsylvania, Pa, USA, 2008. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2014 A. Bushra Begum et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

1253 Views | 655 Downloads | 1 Citation
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at help@hindawi.com to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.