Journal of Chemistry

Journal of Chemistry / 2014 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2014 |Article ID 963729 |

Hai Ping Chen, Kai Yang, Chun Xue You, Ning Lei, Rui Qi Sun, Zhu Feng Geng, Ping Ma, Qian Cai, Shu Shan Du, Zhi Wei Deng, "Chemical Constituents and Insecticidal Activities of the Essential Oil of Cinnamomum camphora Leaves against Lasioderma serricorne", Journal of Chemistry, vol. 2014, Article ID 963729, 5 pages, 2014.

Chemical Constituents and Insecticidal Activities of the Essential Oil of Cinnamomum camphora Leaves against Lasioderma serricorne

Academic Editor: Patricia Valentao
Received11 Mar 2014
Accepted16 Jun 2014
Published29 Jun 2014


During our screening program for agrochemicals from Chinese medicinal herbs and wild plants, the essential oil of Cinnamomum camphora leaves was found to possess strong fumigant and contact toxicity against Lasioderma serricorne adults with LC50/LD50 values of 2.5 mg/L air and 21.25 μg/adult, respectively. The essential oil obtained by hydrodistillation was investigated by GC and GC-MS. The main components of the essential oil were identified to be D-camphor (40.54%), linalool (22.92%), cineole (11.26%), and 3,7,11-trimethyl-3-hydroxy-6,10-dodecadien-1-yl acetate (4.50%). Bioactivity-directed chromatographic separation on repeated silica gel columns led to the isolation of D-camphor and linalool. D-camphor and linalool showed strong fumigant toxicity (LC50 = 2.36 and 18.04 mg/L air, resp.) and contact toxicity (LD50 = 13.44 and 12.74 μg/adult, resp.) against L. serricorne. The results indicate that the essential oil of C. camphora and its active compounds had the potential to be developed as natural fumigants and insecticides for control of L. serricorne.

1. Introduction

The cigarette beetle, Lasioderma serricorne Fabricius, is one of the most widespread and destructive primary insect pests of stored cereals [1]. The infestations of stored product insects currently not only cause significant losses due to the consumption of grains but also result in the rise of temperature and moisture which lead to an accelerated growth of molds, including toxigenic species [2]. Control of stored product insects relies heavily on the use of synthetic insecticides and fumigants, which has led to problems such as disturbances of the environment, increasing costs of application, pest resurgence, pest resistance to pesticides, and lethal effects on nontarget organisms in addition to direct toxicity to users [3]. These problems have necessitated a search for alternative ecofriendly insect pest control methods [4]. Botanical pesticides have the advantage of providing novel modes of action against insects that can reduce the risk of cross-resistance as well as offering new leads for design of target-specific molecules [5, 6]. The use of essential oils or their constituents with low mammalian toxicity can effectively prevent and/or suppress insect pest especially in storage [5]. During our screening program for new agrochemicals from local wild plants and Chinese medicinal herbs, the essential oil from C. camphora leaves has been found to possess contact and fumigant activities towards L. serricorne.

Cinnamomum camphora (L.) Presl (family: Lauraceae) is a Chinese medicinal plant widespread in China and has long been prescribed in traditional medicine for treatment of inflammation-related diseases, such as rheumatism, sprains, bronchitis, and muscle pains [7]. Pharmacological studies have revealed that the plant possesses a wide range of therapeutic activities, including anthelmintic [8], sperm viability effect [9], antibacterial [10], antiallergic [11], and anti-inflammatory [12]. C. camphora is a well-known chemotype; on distillation, the wood from different groups of trees may yield camphor, linalool, safrole, or cineole as the major chemical. The use of C. camphora as a source of leaf oil has expanded in recent years, and it is now an important source of natural linalool (which is still preferred over the synthetic form for some fragrant applications) [13]. A literature survey has shown that there is no report on insecticidal activity of C. camphora essential oil against L. serricorne adults; thus, we decided to investigate the chemical constituents and contact/fumigant activity of the essential oil of C. camphora against L. serricorne for the first time and to isolate any biologically active compounds from its essential oil.

2. Experimental

2.1. Tested Insect Species

L. serricorne were obtained from laboratory cultures maintained for the last 2 years in the dark in incubators at °C and 70–80% relative humidity. The insects were reared in glass containers (0.5 L) containing wheat flour at 12-13% moisture content mixed with yeast (wheat feed/yeast, 10 : 1, w/w). Adults used in all the experiments were about days old regardless of gender.

2.2. Plant Materials

Leaves (3.5 kg) of C. camphora were collected in May 2013 from Suzhou City (31.97°N latitude and 120.49°E longitude), Jiangsu Province, China. The leaves were air-dried for one week and ground to powder. The species was identified according to the voucher specimen (BNU-CMH-Dushuahan-2013-05-25-006) deposited at the Herbarium of College of Resources Science and Technology, Beijing Normal University (BNU).

2.3. Extraction and Analysis of Essential Oil

The ground powder of C. camphora leaves was subjected to hydrodistillation using a modified Clevenger-type apparatus for 6 h and extracted with -hexane. Anhydrous sodium sulphate was used to remove water after extraction. The essential oil was stored in air-tight container in a refrigerator at 4°C.

GC-MS analysis was performed on a Thermo Finnigan Trace DSQ instrument equipped with a flame ionization detector and an HP-5MS (30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 μm) capillary column. The column temperature was programmed at 50°C for 2 min and then increased at 2°C/min to the temperature of 150°C and held for 2 min and then increased at 10°C/min until the final temperature of 250°C was reached, where it was held for 5 min. The injector temperature was maintained at 250°C and the volume injected was 0.1 mL of 1% solution (diluted in -hexane). The carrier gas was helium at flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. Spectra were scanned from 50 to 550 m/z. Most constituents were identified by comparison of their retention indices with those reported in the literature. The retention indices were determined in relation to a homologous series of -alkanes (C10–C36) under the same operating conditions. Further identification was made by comparison of their mass spectra with those stored in NIST 05 and Wiley 275 libraries or with mass spectra from the literature [14]. Relative percentages of the individual components of the essential oil were obtained by averaging the GC peak area % reports.

2.4. Isolation and Characterization of Two Constituent Compounds

The crude essential oil (5 mL) was chromatographed on a silica gel (Qingdao Marine Chemical Plant, Shandong Province, China) column (30 mm i.d., 500 mm length) by gradient elution with -hexane first, then with -hexane-ethyl acetate, and last with ethyl acetate to obtain 19 fractions. Based on contact toxicity, fractions 3 and 12 were chosen for further fractionation. With PTLC, two purified compounds were obtained. The isolated compounds were elucidated with NMR spectra. NMR experiments were performed on Bruker Avance DRX 500 instrument using CDCl3 as solvent with TMS as internal standard.

2.5. Fumigant Toxicity Bioassay

The fumigant activity of the essential oil/pure compounds against L. serricorne adults was tested as described by Liu and Ho [1]. A serial dilution of the essential oil (five concentrations) was prepared in -hexane. Whatman filter papers (diameter 2.0 cm) were each impregnated with 10 μL dilution and then placed on the underside of the screw cap of a glass vial (diameter 2.5 cm, height 5.5 cm, and volume 25 mL). The solvent was allowed to evaporate for 20 s before the cap was placed tightly on the glass vial, each of which contained 10 insects inside to form a sealed chamber. Preliminary experiments demonstrated that 30 s was sufficient for the evaporation of solvents. -Hexane was used as a control. Five replicates were carried out for all treatments and controls, and they were incubated for 24 h. The insects were considered dead if their appendages did not move when probed with a camel brush. The LC50 values were calculated by using Probit analysis [15].

2.6. Contact Toxicity

The contact toxicity of the essential oil/pure compounds against L. serricorne adults was measured as described by Liu and Ho [1]. Range-finding studies were run to determine the appropriate testing concentrations. Serial dilutions of the essential oil/compounds (five concentrations) were prepared in -hexane. Aliquots of 0.5 μL of the dilutions were applied topically to the dorsal thorax of the insects. Controls were determined using -hexane. Five replicates were carried out for all treatments and controls. Both treated and control insects were then transferred to glass vials (10 insects/vial) with culture media and kept in incubators. Mortality was recorded after 24 h and the LD50 values were calculated using Probit analysis [15]. Positive control pyrethrins (pyrethrin 1 : 24%; pyrethrin 2 : 13%; cinnerin 1 : 2%; cinnerin 2 : 2%; jasmolin 1 : 1%; jasmolin 2 : 1%) were purchased from Dr. Ehrenstorfer GmbH.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Chemical Constituent of Essential Oil

The yield of C. camphora leaves essential oil was 1.83% (v/w) and the density of the essential oil was determined to be 0.92 g/mL. GC-MS analysis of the essential oil of C. camphora leaves led to the identification and quantification of a total of 32 major components, accounting for 97.62% of the total components present (Table 1).

CompoundsRI*Content (%)

Dihydro-cis- -copaene-8-ol13790.61
Germacrene D14740.94
3,7,11-Trimethyl-3-hydroxy-6,10-dodecadien-1-yl acetate16344.50
Oxalic acid, di(1-methyl) ester16720.43


RI: retention index as determined on a HP-5MS column using the homologous series of n-hydrocarbons.

The main constituents of C. camphora leaves essential oil were -camphor (40.54%), linalool (22.92%), cineole (11.26%), and 3,7,11-trimethyl-3-hydroxy-6,10-dodecadien-1-yl acetate (4.50%). There are five chemotypes existing in C. camphora according to different primary component in the essential oil. C. camphora could be divided as the following chemical types (physiological types) by the major compounds of their leaf oils: camphor-type; linalool-type; cineol-type; isonerolidol-type; and borneol-type [16]. The results indicated that the C. camphora collected from Suzhou was camphor-type. With further isolation, two purified compounds were obtained and analysed by various NMR techniques including 1H NMR and 13C NMR. Combining all the NMR spectra data, the two isolated compounds were finally recognized as -camphor (1, 1.56 g) and linalool (2, 0.87 g). The spectral data of -camphor matched with the previous report [17]. The data of linalool matched with the previous report [18].

3.2. Fumigant and Contact Toxicity

The essential oil of C. camphora leaves showed strong fumigant toxicity against L. serricorne adults with LC50 value of 2.50 mg/L (Table 2). The isolated compounds -camphor and linalool also exhibited strong fumigant toxicity against L. serricorne adults with LC50 values of 2.36 and 18.04 mg/L, respectively (Table 2).

Treatment Fumigant toxicity Contact toxicity
LC50 ( g/mL air)95% FL LD50 ( g/adult)95% FL

C.  camphora 2.502.20–2.9114.4321.2519.16–23.6411.25
Phosphine9.23 × 10−37.13 × 10−3–11.37 × 10−311.96

The essential oil of C. camphora leaves also showed strong contact toxicity against L. serricorne adults with LD50 value of 21.25 μg/adult (Table 2). Compared with the positive control pyrethrins, the crude essential oil demonstrated 89 times less toxicity because the pyrethrins had acute contact toxicity to L. serricorne adult with LD50 value of 0.24 μg/adult. The isolated compounds, -camphor and linalool also exhibited strong contact toxicity against L. serricorne adults with LD50 values of 13.44 and 12.74 μg/adult, respectively (Table 2).

In previous research, insecticidal activity of essential oil of C. camphora was proven in the pest control of the stored grain Trogoderma granarium, Tribolium confusum, and Coptotermes curvignathus [19, 20]. However, this is the first report regarding insecticidal action of the essential oil of C. camphora leaves against L. serricorne. There is also no report on fumigant and contact toxicity of -camphor and linalool against L. serricorne. Compared with the commercial fumigant phosphine (LC50 = 9.23 × 10−3 mg/L), the essential oil and -camphor exhibited almost 271 and 256 times less fumigant toxicity against L. serricorne adults. However, compared with the other essential oils in the literature, the crude essential oil suggested stronger level of fumigant toxicity towards L. serricorne adults, for example, essential oils of Cinnamomum cassia bark (LC50 = 11.03 μL/L) [21] and Lavandula stoechas (LC50 = 3.84 μL/L) [22]. There are some reports on insecticidal activity of -camphor. Suthisut et al. tested contact toxicity of camphor toward Tribolium castaneum (LD50 = 70 μg/mg) and Sitophilus zeamais (LD50 = 137 μg/mg) [23]. In contact toxicity assays, (+)​-camphor had weak activity against Tribolium castaneum and Sitophilus oryzae (LC50 values above 500 μg/cm2) [24]. The component was also effective as a fumigant; LC50 value was found to be 21.64 mg/L air against Sitophilus zeamais [25]. Camphor also exhibited strong contact toxicity (LD50 = 207.26 μg/cm2) and fumigant toxicity (LC50 = 1.03 mg/L air) against Liposcelis bostrychophila [26]. So the toxic effects of C. camphora leaves oil could be attributed to -camphor and other components.

Currently, the use of synthetic chemicals has led to unintended side effects such as ozone depletion, pest resistance, environmental pollution, and toxicity on nontarget organisms [27, 28]. An alternative is to use natural products that possess good efficacy and are environmentally friendly. Essential oils from many plants have been extensively tested to assess their insecticidal and repellent properties as a valuable natural resource. Based on our results, fumigant activity of the crude essential oil and -camphor are quite promising and they show potential to be developed as possible natural fumigants for control of stored product insects. Among the oil and compounds assayed against L. serricorne, the essential oil is the most promising as possible natural fumigants. Although -camphor is more toxic than the oil, the difference is quite small. Therefore, there is no need for further isolation. However, for the practical application of the essential oil/compounds as novel fumigant and insecticides, further studies on the safety of the essential oil/compounds to humans and on development of formulations are necessary to improve the efficacy and stability and to reduce cost.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


This project was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 81374069). The authors thank Dr. Liu Q. R. from the College of Life Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, for the identification of the investigated medicinal herb.


  1. Z. L. Liu and S. H. Ho, “Bioactivity of the essential oil extracted from Evodia rutaecarpa Hook f. et Thomas against the grain storage insects, Sitophilus zeamais Motsch. and Tribolium castaneum (Herbst),” Journal of Stored Products Research, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 317–328, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. N. Magan, R. Hope, V. Cairns, and D. Aldred, “Post-harvest fungal ecology: impact of fungal growth and mycotoxin accumulation in stored grain,” European Journal of Plant Pathology, vol. 109, no. 7, pp. 723–730, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. M. B. Isman, “Plant essential oils as green pesticides for pest and disease management,” ACS Symposium, vol. 887, pp. 41–51, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  4. T. W. Phillips and J. E. Throne, “Biorational approaches to managing stored-product insects,” Annual Review of Entomology, vol. 55, pp. 375–397, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. M. B. Isman, “Botanical insecticides, deterrents, and repellents in modern agriculture and an increasingly regulated world,” Annual Review of Entomology, vol. 51, pp. 45–66, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. M. B. Isman, “Botanical insecticides: for richer, for poorer,” Pest Management Science, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 8–11, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. J. H. Lee, E. A. Hyun, and W. J. Yoon, “In vitro anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidative effects of Cinnamomum camphora extracts,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 103, no. 2, pp. 208–216, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. R. Haque, S. Mindal, and P. Ghosh, “Investigation of in vitro anthelmintic activity of cinnamomum camphor leaves,” International Journal of Drug Development and Research, vol. 3, pp. 301–306, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  9. M. V. Jadhav, R. C. Sharma, R. Mansee, and A. K. Gangawane, “Effect of Cinnamomum camphora on human sperm motility and sperm viability,” Journal of Clinical Research Letters, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  10. P. Rangari, “Screening of antibacterial sensitivty of essential oils of camphor and cinnamon,” Shodh Anusandhan Samachar, vol. 1, pp. 22–26, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  11. H. Tanabe, R. Fukutomi, K. Yasui et al., “Identification of dimethylmatairesinol as an immunoglobulin E-suppressing component of the leaves of Cinnamomum camphora,” Journal of Health Science, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 184–187, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. H. J. Lee, E. Hyun, W. J. Yoon et al., “In vitro anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidative effects of Cinnamomum camphora extracts,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 103, no. 2, pp. 208–216, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. C. Orwa, A. Mutua, and R. Kindt, “Cinnamomum camphora,” Agroforestry Database, vol. 40, pp. 1–5, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  14. P. R. Adams, “Identification of essential oil components by gas chromatography/ quadrupole mass spectroscopy,” Allured Publishing Corporation, Carol Stream, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  15. M. Sakuma, “Probit analysis of preference data,” Applied Entomology and Zoology, vol. 33, pp. 339–347, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  16. W. Shi, W. He, and G. Wen, “Study on chemical constituents of the essential oil and classification of types from Cinnamomum camphora,” Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, vol. 31, pp. 209–214, 1989. View at: Google Scholar
  17. G. E. Hawkes, K. Herwig, and J. D. Roberts, “Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Use of 13C spectra to establish configurations of oximes,” Journal of Organic Chemistry, vol. 39, no. 8, pp. 1017–1028, 1974. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. F. Bohlmann, R. Zeisberg, and E. Klein, “C-NMR-spektren von monoterpenen,” Organic Magnetic Resonance, vol. 7, no. 9, pp. 426–432, 1975. View at: Google Scholar
  19. G. E. Nenaah and S. I. A. Ibrahim, “Chemical composition and the insecticidal activity of certain plants applied as powders and essential oils against two stored-products coleopteran beetles,” Journal of Pest Science, vol. 84, no. 3, pp. 393–402, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. K. Roszaini, M. A. Nor Azah, J. Mailina, S. Zaini, and Z. M. Faridz, “Toxicity and antitermite activity of the essential oils from Cinnamomum camphora, Cymbopogon nardus, Melaleuca cajuputi and Dipterocarpus sp. against Coptotermes curvignathus,” Wood Science and Technology, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 1273–1284, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. H. J. Lu, H. X. Su, and Y. Du, “Bioactivity of Cinnamomum cassia (Laurales: Lauraceae) bark extract on Lasioderma serricorne (Coleoptera: Anobiidae),” Natural Resources and Sustainable Development II, vol. 524, pp. 2065–2068, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  22. A. Ebadollahi, M. Safaralizadeh, and A. Pourmirza, “Fumigant toxicity of Lavandula stoechas L. Oil against three insect pests attacking stored products,” Journal of Plant Protection Research, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 56–60, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. D. Suthisut, P. G. Fields, and A. Chandrapatya, “Contact toxicity, feeding reduction, and repellency of essential oils from three plants from the ginger family (zingiberaceae) and their major components against sitophilus zeamais and tribolium castaneum,” Journal of Economic Entomology, vol. 104, no. 4, pp. 1445–1454, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. S. A. M. Abdelgaleil, M. I. E. Mohamed, M. E. I. Badawy, and S. A. A. El-Arami, “Fumigant and contact toxicities of monoterpenes to Sitophilus oryzae (L.) and Tribolium castaneum (Herbst) and their inhibitory effects on acetylcholinesterase activity,” Journal of Chemical Ecology, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 518–525, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. S. Chu, S. Du, and Z. L. Liu, “Fumigant compounds from the essential oil of Chinese Blumea balsamifera leaves against the maize weevil (Sitophilus zeamais),” Journal of Chemistry, vol. 2013, Article ID 289874, 7 pages, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. Z. L. Liu, N. N. Zhao, C. M. Liu, L. Zhou, and S. S. Du, “Identification of insecticidal constituents of the essential oil of curcuma wenyujin rhizomes active against liposcelis bostrychophila badonnel,” Molecules, vol. 17, no. 10, pp. 12049–12060, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. B. Jembere, D. Obeng-Ofori, A. Hassanali, and G. N. N. Nyamasyo, “Products derived from the leaves of Ocimum kilimandscharicum (Labiatae) as post-harvest grain protectants against the infestation of three major stored product insect pests,” Bulletin of Entomological Research, vol. 85, pp. 361–367, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. E. U. Okonkwo and W. I. Okoye, “The efficacy of four seed powders and the essential oils as protectants of cowpea and maize grains against infestation by Callosobruchus maculatus (Fabricus) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) and Sitophilus zeamais (Motschulsky) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in Nigeria,” International Journal of Pest Management, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 143–146, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2014 Hai Ping Chen et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted research articles as well as case reports and case series related to COVID-19. Review articles are excluded from this waiver policy. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.