Nonlinear Seepage Model of Gas Transport in Multiscale Shale Gas Reservoirs and Productivity Analysis of Fractured Well

<table class="figure-group"><tr class="fig-image" id="a"><td><object data="https://static.hindawi.com/articles/jchem/volume-2015/349507/figures/349507.fig.0011a.svgz" name="349507.fig.0011a" type="image/svg+xml"></object></td></tr><tr class="fig-caption"><td><b>(a) </b>Comparison between <svg height="12.3115pt" id="M136" style="vertical-align:-3.31355pt" version="1.1" viewbox="-0.0498162 -8.99795 17.7066 12.3115" width="17.7066pt" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><g transform="matrix(.0135,0,0,-0.0135,0,0)"><path d="M699 368C699 549 574 666 407 666C186 666 23 488 23 277C23 113 129 -3 288 -13L307 -26C431 -111 501 -139 533 -147C559 -154 613 -163 658 -164L666 -141C597 -111 507 -66 430 -11L416 -1C580 42 699 190 699 368ZM601 371C601 227 518 54 381 22L354 40L278 24C175 47 120 145 120 269C120 451 235 631 398 631C540 631 601 521 601 371Z" id="g113-82"></path><glyph.data ascent="3473" descent="-2876" horiz-adv-x="722" vert-adv-y="722"></glyph.data></g><g transform="matrix(.0095,0,0,-0.0095,9.714,3.264)"><path d="M786 370C786 572 637 650 431 650H137L130 618C217 606 220 603 204 519L129 127C115 48 107 39 26 30L18 0H270C410 0 516 20 609 75C722 140 786 240 786 370ZM683 373C683 178 547 40 323 40C298 40 264 40 241 45C213 51 207 64 220 127L295 545C304 582 309 595 320 601C335 610 367 613 406 613C570 613 683 538 683 373Z" id="g50-69"></path><glyph.data ascent="3443" descent="-2856" horiz-adv-x="810" vert-adv-y="810"></glyph.data></g></svg> and <svg height="14.758pt" id="M137" style="vertical-align:-5.760051pt" version="1.1" viewbox="-0.0498162 -8.99795 16.4786 14.758" width="16.4786pt" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><g transform="matrix(.0135,0,0,-0.0135,0,0)"><path d="M699 368C699 549 574 666 407 666C186 666 23 488 23 277C23 113 129 -3 288 -13L307 -26C431 -111 501 -139 533 -147C559 -154 613 -163 658 -164L666 -141C597 -111 507 -66 430 -11L416 -1C580 42 699 190 699 368ZM601 371C601 227 518 54 381 22L354 40L278 24C175 47 120 145 120 269C120 451 235 631 398 631C540 631 601 521 601 371Z" id="g113-82"></path><glyph.data ascent="3473" descent="-2876" horiz-adv-x="722" vert-adv-y="722"></glyph.data></g><g transform="matrix(.0095,0,0,-0.0095,9.714,3.264)"><path d="M620 667C620 684 593 710 552 710C515 710 459 687 409 634C360 582 334 506 320 433H247L215 400L220 388H310L259 80C224 -129 199 -161 185 -174C175 -183 160 -192 141 -192C123 -192 90 -181 75 -165C69 -158 64 -156 54 -164C39 -178 24 -195 24 -208C24 -231 61 -257 94 -257C124 -257 162 -243 209 -194C267 -134 303 -66 343 107C369 220 378 279 393 385L503 397L523 433H404C432 619 464 660 500 660C522 660 542 646 566 621C573 614 583 615 593 621C603 628 620 648 620 667Z" id="g50-103"></path><glyph.data ascent="3443" descent="-2856" horiz-adv-x="644" vert-adv-y="644"></glyph.data></g></svg> (at different permeability and wellbore pressure)</td></tr><tr class="fig-image" id="b"><td><object data="https://static.hindawi.com/articles/jchem/volume-2015/349507/figures/349507.fig.0011b.svgz" name="349507.fig.0011b" type="image/svg+xml"></object></td></tr><tr class="fig-caption"><td><b>(b) </b>The value of <svg height="15.4379pt" id="M138" style="vertical-align:-5.759999pt" version="1.1" viewbox="-0.0498162 -9.6779 39.6884 15.4379" width="39.6884pt" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><g transform="matrix(.0135,0,0,-0.0135,0,0)"><path d="M699 368C699 549 574 666 407 666C186 666 23 488 23 277C23 113 129 -3 288 -13L307 -26C431 -111 501 -139 533 -147C559 -154 613 -163 658 -164L666 -141C597 -111 507 -66 430 -11L416 -1C580 42 699 190 699 368ZM601 371C601 227 518 54 381 22L354 40L278 24C175 47 120 145 120 269C120 451 235 631 398 631C540 631 601 521 601 371Z" id="g113-82"></path><glyph.data ascent="3473" descent="-2876" horiz-adv-x="722" vert-adv-y="722"></glyph.data></g><g transform="matrix(.0095,0,0,-0.0095,9.714,3.264)"><path d="M620 667C620 684 593 710 552 710C515 710 459 687 409 634C360 582 334 506 320 433H247L215 400L220 388H310L259 80C224 -129 199 -161 185 -174C175 -183 160 -192 141 -192C123 -192 90 -181 75 -165C69 -158 64 -156 54 -164C39 -178 24 -195 24 -208C24 -231 61 -257 94 -257C124 -257 162 -243 209 -194C267 -134 303 -66 343 107C369 220 378 279 393 385L503 397L523 433H404C432 619 464 660 500 660C522 660 542 646 566 621C573 614 583 615 593 621C603 628 620 648 620 667Z" id="g50-103"></path><glyph.data ascent="3443" descent="-2856" horiz-adv-x="644" vert-adv-y="644"></glyph.data></g><g transform="matrix(.0135,0,0,-0.0135,16.343,0)"><path d="M368 703H309L44 -163H104L368 703Z" id="g113-48"></path><glyph.data ascent="3473" descent="-2876" horiz-adv-x="412" vert-adv-y="412"></glyph.data></g><g transform="matrix(.0135,0,0,-0.0135,21.93,0)"><path d="M699 368C699 549 574 666 407 666C186 666 23 488 23 277C23 113 129 -3 288 -13L307 -26C431 -111 501 -139 533 -147C559 -154 613 -163 658 -164L666 -141C597 -111 507 -66 430 -11L416 -1C580 42 699 190 699 368ZM601 371C601 227 518 54 381 22L354 40L278 24C175 47 120 145 120 269C120 451 235 631 398 631C540 631 601 521 601 371Z" id="g113-82"></path><glyph.data ascent="3473" descent="-2876" horiz-adv-x="722" vert-adv-y="722"></glyph.data></g><g transform="matrix(.0095,0,0,-0.0095,31.644,3.264)"><path d="M786 370C786 572 637 650 431 650H137L130 618C217 606 220 603 204 519L129 127C115 48 107 39 26 30L18 0H270C410 0 516 20 609 75C722 140 786 240 786 370ZM683 373C683 178 547 40 323 40C298 40 264 40 241 45C213 51 207 64 220 127L295 545C304 582 309 595 320 601C335 610 367 613 406 613C570 613 683 538 683 373Z" id="g50-69"></path><glyph.data ascent="3443" descent="-2856" horiz-adv-x="810" vert-adv-y="810"></glyph.data></g></svg> at different matrix permeability and wellbore pressure</td></tr></table>

<div>Effects of Knudsen diffusion coefficient <svg height="12.3115pt" id="M134" style="vertical-align:-3.31355pt" version="1.1" viewbox="-0.0498162 -8.99795 17.353 12.3115" width="17.353pt" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><g transform="matrix(.0135,0,0,-0.0135,0,0)"><path d="M743 375C743 570 607 650 407 650H136L130 622C214 612 220 606 204 526L125 122C110 43 105 36 24 27L17 0H250C382 0 482 23 571 76C680 141 743 248 743 375ZM644 379C644 188 520 36 305 36C277 36 249 38 229 46C205 55 202 71 212 126L293 553C300 588 306 600 317 606C330 613 356 617 390 617C547 617 644 537 644 379Z" id="g113-69"></path><glyph.data ascent="3473" descent="-2876" horiz-adv-x="766" vert-adv-y="766"></glyph.data></g><g transform="matrix(.0095,0,0,-0.0095,10.31,3.264)"><path d="M667 0V28C619 34 599 43 546 100C496 154 386 277 311 372C378 440 449 512 488 547C551 605 575 615 650 622V650H410V622L433 619C478 614 479 604 449 568C404 513 337 443 282 390C254 364 234 350 212 345V520C212 609 222 616 299 622V650H41V622C120 616 128 611 128 520V128C128 41 120 34 44 28V0H304V28C221 34 212 41 212 128V318C229 321 242 318 266 291C355 185 436 87 514 0H667Z" id="g190-76"></path><glyph.data ascent="989" descent="-360" horiz-adv-x="673" vert-adv-y="673"></glyph.data></g></svg> and slip factor <svg height="9.89089pt" id="M135" style="vertical-align:-0.2129898pt" version="1.1" viewbox="-0.0498162 -9.6779 6.47756 9.89089" width="6.47756pt" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><g transform="matrix(.0135,0,0,-0.0135,0,0)"><path d="M452 333C452 398 425 448 375 448C329 448 235 404 140 292H138L229 683C233 701 234 712 225 712C208 712 149 686 66 677L64 652H97C135 652 140 651 129 598L38 167C23 96 29 57 44 33C60 7 98 -12 132 -12C169 -12 232 3 290 41C383 102 452 223 452 333ZM365 316C365 199 308 87 239 49C221 39 200 35 183 35C137 35 99 70 112 163C116 191 123 215 129 233C190 316 290 392 330 392C348 392 365 372 365 316Z" id="g113-99"></path><glyph.data ascent="3473" descent="-2876" horiz-adv-x="469" vert-adv-y="469"></glyph.data></g></svg> on productivity.</div>

Journal of Chemistry

fig11

Figure 11

Figure 11: Nonlinear Seepage Model of Gas Transport in Multiscale Shale Gas Reservoirs and Productivity Analysis of Fractured Well 